Koichi Sughimoto1,2, Yasutaka Hirata3, Norimichi Hirahara4, Hiroaki Miyata4, Takaaki Suzuki5, Arata Murakami3, Kagami Miyaji1, Shinichi Takamoto6. 1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan. 2. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 3. Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database, JCVSD-Congenital section, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan. 6. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular valve replacement is the last option to treat the atrioventricular valve regurgitation in single ventricle. This study investigates the mid-term outcomes of the atrioventricular valve replacement based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database registry. METHODS: From 2008 to 2014, 56 patients [34 males (61%) and 22 females (39%)] with a single ventricular circulation, underwent atrioventricular valve replacement. Questionnaires were collected to review operative data, mid-term mortality, morbidity and redo replacement. Risk factor analysis was performed by the Cox regression model for death and redo replacement. RESULTS: Heterotaxy, a right systemic ventricle and a common atrioventricular valve was present in 46% (26/56), 64% and 57% of patients, respectively. The most common timings for atrioventricular valve replacement were the interstage between the second and third palliations (34%) and after the Fontan operation (34%). Twenty died during the 3.7 ± 2.6-year follow-up. Eleven received redo atrioventricular replacement. The cumulative incidences of redo atrioventricular valve replacement and survival at 3 years were 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9-30] and 66% (95% CI 55-80), respectively. Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that a tricuspid valve was a risk factor for redo valve replacement [hazard ratio (HR) 6.76, 95% CI 1.79-25.6; P = 0.005] and that young age was a risk factor for death (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96; P = 0.019). Fourteen patients required a pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Valve replacement for uncontrollable atrioventricular valve regurgitation in single ventricular circulation was associated with a moderately high risk of death, redo replacement and pacemaker implantation, whereas valve replacement at a later period and with a larger prosthetic valve size was associated with low mortality.
OBJECTIVES:Atrioventricular valve replacement is the last option to treat the atrioventricular valve regurgitation in single ventricle. This study investigates the mid-term outcomes of the atrioventricular valve replacement based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database registry. METHODS: From 2008 to 2014, 56 patients [34 males (61%) and 22 females (39%)] with a single ventricular circulation, underwent atrioventricular valve replacement. Questionnaires were collected to review operative data, mid-term mortality, morbidity and redo replacement. Risk factor analysis was performed by the Cox regression model for death and redo replacement. RESULTS: Heterotaxy, a right systemic ventricle and a common atrioventricular valve was present in 46% (26/56), 64% and 57% of patients, respectively. The most common timings for atrioventricular valve replacement were the interstage between the second and third palliations (34%) and after the Fontan operation (34%). Twenty died during the 3.7 ± 2.6-year follow-up. Eleven received redo atrioventricular replacement. The cumulative incidences of redo atrioventricular valve replacement and survival at 3 years were 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9-30] and 66% (95% CI 55-80), respectively. Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that a tricuspid valve was a risk factor for redo valve replacement [hazard ratio (HR) 6.76, 95% CI 1.79-25.6; P = 0.005] and that young age was a risk factor for death (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96; P = 0.019). Fourteen patients required a pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Valve replacement for uncontrollable atrioventricular valve regurgitation in single ventricular circulation was associated with a moderately high risk of death, redo replacement and pacemaker implantation, whereas valve replacement at a later period and with a larger prosthetic valve size was associated with low mortality.
Authors: Stephanie Y Tseng; Saira Siddiqui; Michael V Di Maria; Garick D Hill; Adam M Lubert; Shelby Kutty; Alexander R Opotowsky; Mathias Possner; David L S Morales; James A Quintessenza; Tarek Alsaied Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 5.501