| Literature DB >> 29868509 |
Ludovic Pruneau1,2,3, Kevin Lebrigand4, Bernard Mari4, Thierry Lefrançois2,5, Damien F Meyer1,2, Nathalie Vachiery1,2,5.
Abstract
The obligate intracellular pathogenic bacterium, Ehrlichia ruminantium, is the causal agent of heartwater, a fatal disease in ruminants transmitted by Amblyomma ticks. So far, three strains have been attenuated by successive passages in mammalian cells. The attenuated strains have improved capacity for growth in vitro, whereas they induced limited clinical signs in vivo and conferred strong protection against homologous challenge. However, the mechanisms of pathogenesis and attenuation remain unknown. In order to improve knowledge of E. ruminantium pathogenesis, we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of two distant strains of E. ruminantium, Gardel and Senegal, and their corresponding attenuated strains. Overall, our results showed an upregulation of gene expression encoding for the metabolism pathway in the attenuated strains compared to the virulent strains, which can probably be associated with higher in vitro replicative activity and a better fitness to the host cells. We also observed a significant differential expression of membrane protein-encoding genes between the virulent and attenuated strains. A major downregulation of map1-related genes was observed for the two attenuated strains, whereas upregulation of genes encoding for hypothetical membrane proteins was observed for the four strains. Moreover, CDS_05140, which encodes for a putative porin, displays the highest gene expression in both attenuated strains. For the attenuated strains, the significant downregulation of map1-related gene expression and upregulation of genes encoding other membrane proteins could be important in the implementation of efficient immune responses after vaccination with attenuated vaccines. Moreover, this study revealed an upregulation of gene expression for 8 genes encoding components of Type IV secretion system and 3 potential effectors, mainly in the virulent Gardel strain. Our transcriptomic study, supported by previous proteomic studies, provides and also confirms new information regarding the characterization of genes involved in E. ruminantium virulence and attenuation mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Ehrlichia; attenuation; pathogenicity; transcriptome; virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29868509 PMCID: PMC5962694 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Transcriptome profile reproducibility. (A) Linear correlation between the intensity values obtained from different biological replicates for each strain: virulent Senegal (Sp7b, Sp8a and b), attenuated Senegal (Sp70, p75, and 77), virulent Gardel (Gp38, p43, and p44), attenuated Gardel (Gp238, p243, and p251). (B) Heatplot showing the expression profile of the 300 most discriminating probes for the virulent and attenuated strains in each sample. Expression corresponds to log2 intensity followed by median centering, as visualized on the green to red gradient. Clustering was performed using a Manhattan distance metric and average linkage. (C) Volcano plots showing the global transcriptional changes in the virulent vs. attenuated Gardel and Senegal strains. All probes present on the microarray are plotted. Each circle represents one probe. The log2 FC is shown on the x-axis. The y-axis shows the log10 of the p-value.
Upregulated genes and their function for the Gardel strains (genome accession numbers: NC_006831.1).
| Energy production and conversion | 1.19 | |||||
| 1.58 | ||||||
| 1.31 | ||||||
| 1.10 | ||||||
| Nucleotide transport and metabolism | ||||||
| 1.73 | ||||||
| 1.54 | ||||||
| 1.50 | ||||||
| 1.32 | ||||||
| Coenzyme transport and metabolism | ||||||
| 1.18 | ||||||
| Replication, recombination and DNA repair | 2.05 | |||||
| 1.75 | 1.21 | |||||
| 1.37 | 1.12 | |||||
| Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones | 1.75 | |||||
| 1.64 | ||||||
| Carbohydrate/AA/inorganic ion transport and metabolism | 1.42 | 1.92 | ||||
| 1.30 | ||||||
| Defense mechanisms | 1.52 | |||||
| Lipid transport and metabolism | 1.62 | |||||
| 1.42 | ||||||
| 1.14 | ||||||
| 1.13 | ||||||
| Cell wall/ membrane/envelope biogenesis | 1.61 | |||||
| 1.33 | ||||||
| 1.30 | ||||||
| 1.14 | ||||||
| 1.06 | ||||||
| Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport | ||||||
| 3.72 | ||||||
| 2.62 | ||||||
| 2.08 | ||||||
| 1.77 | ||||||
| 1.59 | ||||||
| 1.60 | ||||||
| 1.31 | ||||||
| Map1-related protein | ||||||
| Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis | ||||||
| 1.66 | ||||||
| 1,46 | ||||||
| 1,18 | ||||||
| 1,16 | ||||||
| 1,10 | ||||||
| 1,00 | ||||||
| Hypothetical membrane protein | ||||||
| 2.62 | ||||||
| 2.41 | ||||||
| 2.29 | 2.57 | |||||
| 2.04 | 2.30 | |||||
| 1.80 | 2.22 | |||||
| 1.40 | 1.78 | |||||
| 1.28 | 1.75 | |||||
| 1.21 | 1.71 | |||||
| 1.41 | ||||||
| 1.25 | ||||||
| 1.23 | ||||||
| 1.12 | ||||||
| Hypothetical protein | 3.81 | |||||
| 3.69 | ||||||
| 3.57 | ||||||
| 2.76 | ||||||
| 2.51 | ||||||
| 2.51 | ||||||
| 2.49 | ||||||
| 2.31 | 3.10 | |||||
| 2.18 | 2.24 | |||||
| 1.82 | 1.98 | |||||
| 1.78 | 1.45 | |||||
| 1.56 | 1.25 | |||||
| 1.43 | 1.10 | |||||
| 1.50 | 1.10 | |||||
| 1.38 | 1.05 | |||||
| 1.16 | ||||||
| Number of upregulated genes | 50 | 64 | ||||
Bold blue: common upregulated genes in the Gardel and Senegal strains.
Bold pink: conversely upregulated genes in the Gardel and Senegal strains.
gene encoding for proteins detected in a proteomic study comparing the virulent and attenuated Gardel strains (Marcelino et al., .
gene encoding for proteins differentially expressed in a proteomic study comparing the virulent and attenuated Gardel strains (Marcelino et al., .
gene encoding for strain-specific protein based on a proteomic study comparing the virulent and attenuated Gardel strains (Marcelino et al., .
Figure 2Venn diagram of upregulated genes for the virulent and attenuated strains. Numbers of upregulated genes are indicated for each strain (in black). The numbers of common upregulated genes are indicated in circle intersections (in white).
Upregulated genes and their function for the Senegal strains (genome accession numbers: NC_006831.1).
| Energy production and conversion | 1.16 | |||||
| 1.90 | ||||||
| 1.87 | ||||||
| 1.60 | ||||||
| 1.59 | ||||||
| 1.26 | ||||||
| 1.10 | ||||||
| 1.09 | ||||||
| Nucleotide transport and metabolism | 1.56 | |||||
| 1.50 | 1.72 | |||||
| 1.33 | ||||||
| Coenzyme transport and metabolism | ||||||
| 1.89 | ||||||
| 1.72 | 1.58 | |||||
| 1.63 | ||||||
| 1.52 | ||||||
| 1.25 | ||||||
| 1.06 | ||||||
| Replication, recombination and DNA repair | 1.90 | |||||
| 1.53 | ||||||
| 1.32 | ||||||
| 1.31 | ||||||
| Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones | 1.82 | 2.44 | ||||
| 1.66 | ||||||
| 1.29 | 1.43 | |||||
| Carbohydrate/AA/inorganic ion transport and metabolism | 1.73 | 1.03 | ||||
| 1.73 | ||||||
| 1.66 | ||||||
| 1.59 | ||||||
| 1.44 | ||||||
| 1.42 | ||||||
| 1.22 | ||||||
| Lipid transport and metabolism | 1.33 | |||||
| Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning | 1.48 | |||||
| Cell wall/ membrane/envelope biogenesis | 1.47 | 1.45 | ||||
| 1.36 | ||||||
| Intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport | 1.77 | |||||
| 1.48 | 2.43 | |||||
| Map1-related protein | ||||||
| 2.47 | ||||||
| 1.10 | ||||||
| Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis | 2.42 | |||||
| 2.58 | ||||||
| 1.53 | 1.89 | |||||
| 1.51 | 1.51 | |||||
| 1.42 | 1.24 | |||||
| 1.28 | 1.08 | |||||
| 1.13 | ||||||
| Hypothetical membrane protein | ||||||
| 2.00 | 1.14 | |||||
| 1.84 | 1.11 | |||||
| 1.69 | ||||||
| 1.67 | ||||||
| 1.58 | ||||||
| 1.51 | ||||||
| 1.43 | ||||||
| 1.43 | ||||||
| 1.37 | ||||||
| 1.11 | ||||||
| Hypothetical protein | ||||||
| 2.38 | ||||||
| 2.04 | ||||||
| 1.93 | ||||||
| 1.70 | ||||||
| 1.65 | ||||||
| 1.63 | 2.30 | |||||
| 1.60 | 2.18 | |||||
| 1.59 | 1.92 | |||||
| 1.51 | 1.77 | |||||
| 1.50 | 1.56 | |||||
| 1.50 | 1.48 | |||||
| 1.46 | 1.44 | |||||
| 1.46 | 1.29 | |||||
| 1.40 | 1.25 | |||||
| 1.35 | 1.06 | |||||
| 1.33 | 1.06 | |||||
| 1.31 | ||||||
| 1.30 | ||||||
| 1.28 | ||||||
| 1.25 | ||||||
| 1.20 | ||||||
| 1.17 | ||||||
| 1.11 | ||||||
| Number of upregulated genes | 83 | 50 | ||||
Bold blue: common upregulated genes in the Gardel and Senegal strains.
Bold pink: conversely upregulated genes in the Gardel and Senegal strains.
Figure 3Circos genome diagram showing differentially expressed genes between the virulent and attenuated strains. From outer to inner, positive and negative genome strands for Gardel (yellow) and for Senegal (blue) respectively and mean of log2 FC for each CDS are shown. Upregulated genes in the virulent strains are in red and upregulated genes in the attenuated strains are in green. Some areas are enlarged and correspond to map1-family genes (magnification 8-fold) and to Vir genes and genes encoding hypothetical membrane proteins (hmp) and hypothetical proteins (hp) (magnification 5-fold). Hmp1: CDS 02240; hmp2: CDS 02250; hmp3: CDS 02290; hmp4: CDS 02300; hmp5: CDS 02320; hmp6: CDS 02330; hmp7: CDS 02390; hmp8: CDS 02480; hmp9: CDS 03690; hmp 10: CDS 04750; hmp11: CDS 04760; hmp12: CDS 05140; hmp13: CDS 07940. Hp1: CDS 02340; hp2: CDS2370; hp3: CDS 02410; hp4: CDS 02440; hp5: CDS 04510; hp6: CDS 08310; hp7: CDS 09020.
Figure 4Proportion of upregulated genes per COG for the virulent and attenuated strains.
Comparison of log2 FC for map1-related genes obtained by microarrays and qRTPCR.
| 1.29 | 1.56 | 1.62 | 11.6 | ||
| 1 | −0.6 | 2.47 | 4.1 | ||
| 1.36 | 1.17 | 2.4 | 2.2 | ||
| 1.84 | 1.61 | 1.67 | 2.2 | ||
| 2.14 | 1.38 | 2.10 | ND | ||
| 2.36 | 2.57 | 1.07 | 3.69 | ||
| 1.71 | 9.27 | 2.87 | 2.8 | ||
ND, not detected.
not significantly differentially expressed.