Literature DB >> 29868100

Identification and Mapping of the Clubroot Resistance Gene CRd in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis).

Wenxing Pang1, Pengyu Fu1, Xiaonan Li1, Zongxiang Zhan1, Sha Yu1, Zhongyun Piao1.   

Abstract

The rapid spread of clubroot disease, which is caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae, threatens Brassicaceae crop production worldwide. Breeding plants that have broad-spectrum disease resistance is one of the best ways to prevent clubroot. In the present study, eight Chinese cabbage germplasms were screened using published clubroot-resistant (CR) loci-/gene-linked markers. A CR gene Crr3 potential carrier "85-74" was detected which linked to marker BRSTS61; however, "85-74" shows different responses to local pathogens "LAB-19," "LNND-2," and "LAB-10" from "CR-73" which harbors Crr3. We used a next-generation sequencing-based bulked segregant analysis approach combined with genetic mapping to detect CR genes in an F2 segregant population generated from a cross between the Chinese cabbage inbred lines "85-74" (CR) and "BJN3-1" (clubroot susceptible). The "85-74" line showed resistance to a local pathogen "LAB-19" which was identified as race 4; a genetic analysis revealed that the resistance was conferred by a single dominant gene. The CR gene which we named CRd was mapped to a 60 kb (1 cM) region between markers yau389 and yau376 on chromosome A03. CRd is located upstream of Crr3 which was confirmed based on the physical positions of Crr3 linked markers. The identification of CRd linked markers can be applied to marker-assisted selection in the breeding of new CR cultivars of Chinese cabbage and other Brassica crops.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CR cultivars; Chinese cabbage; Plasmodiophora brassicae; bulked segregant analysis; clubroot disease; pathogen resistance gene

Year:  2018        PMID: 29868100      PMCID: PMC5968122          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


Introduction

Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) is one of the most important leafy head vegetables cultivated in China, Korea, and Japan. Its production has been undermined by the rapid spread of clubroot disease, resulting in major economic losses. The soil-borne obligate plant pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin causes clubroot in Brassica crops, blocking nutrient and water transport (Voorrips et al., 2003). The life cycle of P. brassicae has not been well understood until now. The P. brassicae infection starts from primary zoospores releasing and causes root hair infection and then primary zoospore or secondary zoospores induce cortical infection leading to the formation of galls on the roots (McDonald et al., 2014). Crop rotation and application of fluazinam and cyazofamid can effectively reduce the viability of resting P. brassicae spores and prevent infection (Ransom et al., 1991; Suzuki et al., 1995; Wallenhammar, 1996; Mitani et al., 2003; Townley and Fox, 2003; Miller et al., 2007; Kutcher et al., 2013; Peng et al., 2014). Although these approaches alleviate the symptoms of clubroot, they do not eradicate the disease. Breeding of clubroot-resistant (CR) cultivars is a desirable strategy for controlling clubroot owing to its advantages such as low cost and environment friendliness. CRa, CRb, CRc, CRk, Crr1, Crr2, Crr3, Crr4, PbBa3.1, PbBa3.3, and QS_B3.1 genes have been identified in European fodder turnips (Matsumoto et al., 1998; Suwabe et al., 2003, 2006; Hirai et al., 2004; Piao et al., 2004; Sakamoto et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2013; Pang et al., 2014). Most of these genes are from different genetic resources and are associated with distinct P. brassicae pathotypes. CRa and CRb were resistant to race 2 and race 4, respectively. Crr1, Crr2, and Crr4 from Siloga were resistant to Ano-01 and Wakayama-01. CRc and CRk from Debra were resistant to isolates M85 and K04. Crr3 was detected from Milan White which was resistant to isolate Ano-01. PbBa3.1 and PbBa3.3 were detected from ECD04 conferring resistance to Pb2 and Pb7, respectively. Several CR genes were also recently mapped in B. rapa (Yu et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017). Some of the genes and loci including CRa, CRb, and QS_B3.1, Crr3, CRk, and PbBa3.3 were clustered in a proximal region of chromosome A03 in B. rapa; whether they represent a single or multiple genes remains to be determined. CRa and Crr1a have been cloned and are known to encode Toll-interleukin-1 receptor-like domain-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat (TIR-NBS-LRR) proteins. It was reported that CRb is the same as CRa (Hatakeyama et al., 2017); however, the identities of the remaining CR genes require confirmation. Molecular markers linked to CR loci or genes are essential for pyramiding several CR genes into one cultivar through marker-assisted selection (MAS). MAS has been successfully used for transforming CR genes into Chinese cabbage (Yoshikawa, 1981; Zhang et al., 2012). However, B. rapa, Brassica oleracea, and Brassica napus plants known to harbor genes conferring specific resistance to P. brassicae (Rocherieux et al., 2004; Werner et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2013) have all exhibited loss of resistance within a few years (Tjallingii, 1965; Kuginuki et al., 1999). Therefore, identifying novel CR genes or alleles associated with resistance to different pathotypes is essential for overcoming the challenges of co-existing pathotypes and the rapid mutation rate of P. brassicae in the field. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based bulked segregant analysis (BSA) is a powerful tool for mapping disease resistance gene/genes that has been applied to Arabidopsis, rice (Oryza sativa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), soybean (Gycin emax), wheat (Triticum turgidum), and cotton (Gossypium; Trick et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2013; Uchida et al., 2014; Han et al., 2015; Song et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2017). In the present study, we found the Chinese cabbage inbred line “85-74,” which exhibited resistance to the local pathogen “LAB-19” (race 4) and was distinct from CR germplasms harboring CRa, Crr1, and Crr3. We employed NGS-based BSA to identify the CR gene/genes in “85-74.” Our results can provide a basis for breeding new CR cultivars of Chinese cabbage.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Eight Chinese cabbage germplasms including “CR Shinki,” “CR-77,” “CR-20,” “CR-75,” “CR-26,” “CR-73,” “85-74,” and “BJN3-1” were used in this study. “CR Shinki” harbors the CRa and CRb gene, and “CR-77,” “CR-20,” “CR-75,” “CR-26,” “CR-73,” and “85-74” were genotyped using published CR loci-/gene-linked markers (Saito et al., 2006; Suwabe et al., 2006; Sakamoto et al., 2008; Ueno et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Hatakeyama et al., 2013; Pang et al., 2014). To evaluate the resistance of CR resources against different pathotypes of P. brassicae, eight CR inbred lines were inoculated with 11 local pathogens. Their pathotypes were classified based on Williams’ clubroot differential set (Williams, 1966), which includes Jersey Queen, Badger shipper, Laurentian, and Wilhelmsburger. The clubroot-susceptible inbred line of Chinese cabbage “BJN3-1” served as a negative control. An analysis of CR loci-/gene-linked markers revealed that “85-74” and “CR-73” harbored the Crr3 gene, but showed distinct responses to three local pathogen isolates. We therefore crossed “85-74” and “BJN3-1” and then self-pollinated the offspring to produce an F2 population; 432 F2 individuals were used for genetic analysis and 127 were self-pollinated to generate an F3 population that was used for CR tests.

Pathogen Inoculation and CR Tests

A total of 11 field isolates were collected from infected Chinese cabbage or canola from different province of China and maintained on the roots of a susceptible Chinese cabbage “91-12” and stored in -20°C until required. These pathogens were classified according to Williams’ clubroot differential set and used to evaluate the resistance of eight Chinese cabbage germplasms; additionally, 24 seeds from each of eight CR Chinese cabbage inbred lines along with Williams’s differential set were grown for pathogen screening in the spring of 2014. A total of 36 seeds of F1 individuals and 432 seeds of F2 individuals of “85-74” and “BJN3-1” were grown and inoculated with “LAB-19” in 2015; 36 seeds from each of 127 F3 populations were grown for the “LAB-19” inoculation test in 2016. All plants were grown in 72-well multipots and maintained in a greenhouse at 20–25°C under a 16-h photoperiod. Resting spores were prepared and inoculation was performed as previously described (Pang et al., 2014). For inoculation, 1 ml of spore suspension was applied to the bottom of the stem base of each 7-days-old seedling; disease resistance was evaluated 6 weeks later.

DNA Extraction and Pool Construction

Young leaves from eight Chinese cabbage germplasm were collected and used for characterization of known CR loci/genes. Young leaves from 127 F2 individuals were sampled and used for genome sequencing and gene mapping. The genomic DNA was extracted according to the cetyl trimethylammonium bromide method (Li et al., 2010), with minor modifications. DNA concentration was determined with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Highly resistant and susceptible F3 families were selected and equal amounts of DNA from selected F2 individuals were mixed together to form resistant and susceptible pools (R- and S-pool, respectively) that were sequenced along with “85-74” and “BJN3-1” with the HiSeq 2500 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States).

Analysis of Markers Linked to Previously Identified CR Genes

Chinese cabbage germplasms were genotyped for known CR loci/genes identification using linked markers (Saito et al., 2006; Suwabe et al., 2006; Sakamoto et al., 2008; Ueno et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Hatakeyama et al., 2013; Pang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). DNA fragments were amplified by PCR and the susceptible “BJN3-1” line was used as a control. PCR products were separated on a standard agarose (2%) or polyacrylamide (6%) gel and their sizes were compared to that of known resistance genes.

Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

Genome sequencing of the two parental lines and R- and S-pools and statistical analysis of bioinformatics data were carried out by Annoroad Co.[1] A library of 300–500-bp insert size was constructed and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Raw data were processed with Perl scripts to ensure data quality for subsequent analyses. The adopted filtering criteria are as follows: (1) remove the adaptor-polluted reads (reads containing more than five adapter-polluted bases were regarded as adaptor-polluted reads and would be filtered out); (2) remove the low-quality reads; reads with the number of low-quality bases (phred Quality value less than 19) accounting for more than 50% of total bases are regarded as low-quality reads; and (3) remove reads with number of N bases accounting for more than 5%. As for paired-end sequencing data, both reads would be filtered out if any read of the paired-end reads are adaptor-polluted. The obtained Clean Data after filtering will be carried out on statistics analyses on its quantity and quality, including Q30, data quantity, base content statistics, etc. Clean reads were aligned to the reference genome sequence “Chiifu-401-42” from the Ensemble Genome database[2] using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner v.0.7.12 (Li and Durbin, 2009). Samtools v.1.2 (Li et al., 2009) was used to sort the reads, and duplicate reads obtained by PCR were removed using the MarkDuplicates command of Picard tools v.1.13[3]. Reads mapped to two or more sites were filtered out. Statistical analyses were carried out using an in-house Perl script. The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK; McKenna et al., 2010) HaplotypeCaller function was used for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and insertion-deletion (InDel) calling. The SNPs and InDels were filtered with the GATK VariantFiltration protocol before further analysis with the following settings: QD < 2.0, MQ < 40, DP < 4, MQRankSum < -12.5. Annotation was performed using ANNOVAR (Wang et al., 2010) for all qualified variants based on the GFF file.

BSA Mapping Using Sequencing Data

To detect candidate loci associated with CR, the SNP index was calculated for all variants (Takagi et al., 2013). To reduce the impact of sequencing and alignment errors, we filtered out variations that met any of the following conditions: (1) loci in parents were heterozygous; (2) depths of variation were <10 or positions were not covered in parents or bulks; (3) variations in SNP index in both bulks were <0.3 or >0.7; or (4) variations were not on chromosomes (e.g., they were on a scaffold). All remaining variants were retained for further analysis. We slid along the genome with a 1-Mb window at a step size of 100 kb to calculate the mean SNP index, and subtracted the SNP index value of the R-pool from that of the S-pool to obtain the ΔSNP index (Takagi et al., 2013). Confidence intervals at 0.1, 0.5, and 0.01 levels were determined by computer simulation; the threshold was set at a 0.01 confidence level to identify candidate quantitative trait loci. The SNPs and InDels in the confidence region were selected and validated through Sanger sequencing.

CRd Mapping and Candidate Genes Analysis

The reference genome sequence from the Ensemble Genome database was downloaded and used for marker development in the CRd candidate region. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were developed using SSR Hunter v.1.3 (Li and Wan, 2005). The two parental lines along with R- and S-pools were used to develop markers linked to the CR gene. A genetic map was constructed with the developed and previously published markers using JoinMap v.4.0 (Stam, 1993; Van Ooijen, 2006). CRd closely linked markers were validated in natural population. The candidate genes in the CRd region were compared with 244 resistance genes in B. rapa[4].

Semi-Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from 0 day, 7 days, 10, and 13 days after inoculation (DAI) of P. brassicae of “85-74” and “BJN3-1” root tissue using an Easy-BLUETM Total RNA Extraction Kit (Invitrogen, United States). The total RNA from each plant sample amounting to 5 μg was combined with random hexamer primers in a Super Script first-strand cDNA synthesis system according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, United States). Complementary DNA was diluted 10-fold, and 1 μl of the diluted cDNA was used in each 20 μl PCR mixture. Sequence information from B. rapa was used for RT-PCR primers design. Standard PCR was performed, with 5 min denaturation at 94°C followed by 25 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s. The PCR products were analyzed following electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.

Results

Characterization of Chinese Cabbage Germplasm

To characterize CR resources of Chinese cabbage, eight inbred lines of CR Chinese cabbage were genotyped with known CR gene linked markers and infected with 11 different local isolates of P. brassicae. “CR-77” and “CR-20” were found to carry Crr1 and CRa; “CR-75” and “CR Shinki” harbored CRa and CRb; “CR-73” harbored CRk and Crr3. “85-74” was a potential carrier of Crr3, which was linked to BRSTS61. “BJN3-1” had no CR loci, and “CR-26” carried unknown CR gene/genes (Table ). Based on Williams’ classification system, local pathogens “AHXC-68,” “LAB-16,” “LNXM-1,” “AHHS-62,” “LAB-19,” and “LNND-2” were identified as pathotype 4; “LAB-7” and “LAB-10” were pathotype 2; “HBLC-31” and “AHHS-65” were pathotype 7; and “AHHS-65” was pathotype 11. CR inbred lines showed variable resistance depending on the presence of infection with these pathogens. The negative control “BJN3-1” was infected by all pathogens. “CR-77” and “CR-20” showed resistance to all 11 pathogens; “85-74” was susceptible to “LNND-2” and “LAB-10,” but resistant to the other pathogens tested in this study; “CR Shinki” was susceptible to “LNXM-1” and “AHHS-62,” but resistance to the other pathogens; “CR-75” and “CR-26” were susceptible to “LNXM-1” and “AHHS-62,” respectively; and “CR-73” was susceptible to “LAB-19” (Table ). “CR-73” and “85-74” showed distinct resistance responses to “LAB-19,” “LNND-2,” and “LAB-10.” This suggests that “85-74” and “CR-73” harbor different CR genes or alleles. Based on these results, “LAB-19” was selected to phenotype F2 and F3 populations derived from the “85-74” and “BJN3-1” cross. Clubroot disease resistance test of Chinese cabbage germplasms and pathotypes identification using Williams’ clubroot differential set.

Phenotype Evaluation and R- and S-Pool Construction

To investigate the inheritance of the resistance to local pathogen “LAB-19,” parental lines, F1, and 432 F2 individuals were inoculated with 1 × 107 spores⋅ml-1. The “85-74” and F1 lines were highly resistant whereas “BJN3-1” was susceptible. Among 432 F2 individuals, 321 and 106 were resistant and susceptible, respectively, and exhibited a 3:1 segregation ratio at a 0.05 level of probability (Table ). These results indicated that CR is controlled by a single dominant gene in “85-74.” Parental lines with 127 F3 families were then inoculated with “LAB-19” in 2016. R- and S-pools were constructed by selecting 19 highly CR and 16 susceptible F2 individuals depending on the F3 family phenotype. Genetic analysis of clubroot resistance in the F2 population.

Sequencing Data Analysis

Sequencing data were generated with Illumina HiSeq 2500 with an average insert size of about 350 bp. A total of 250,343,998, 249,577,324, 250,291,386, and 249,507,094 raw reads were obtained from “85-74,” “BJN3-1,” and R- and S-pools (SRA accession: SRP136862), respectively. Clean data were obtained after removing adapter-polluted and low-quality reads and unknown bases (N > 5%), yielding minimum and maximum clean Q30 base rates of 90% and 92.34%, respectively (Table ). Genome coverage ranged from 90.24 to 91.63%, and average depths were 86.26×, 84.22×, 83.49×, and 85.34× for “85-74,” “BJN3-1,” and R- and S-pools, respectively. Quality control of sequencing data. In total, 2,941,775 SNPs and InDels were detected between “85-74” and “BJN3-1” (Figure ). The average number of sequence variations on the 10 chromosomes was 294,177, with chromosomes A09 and A10 having the highest and lowest number of variations, respectively. Chromosome A03 had a comparatively high number and density of variations in a specific region. Distribution of SNPs and InDels on each chromosome.

Association Analysis

To calculate SNP index, we filtered out sequence variations that met the above-described conditions. Of the 2,941,775 variations, 599,797 were to calculate SNP index (Figure ). According to the ΔSNP index value, a 3.94-Mb candidate region from 13.57 to 17.51 Mb was identified on chromosome A03 at a 0.01 confidence level (Figure ). A total of 19,664 SNPs and 4450 InDels were found in the candidate region; 1953 out of 5861 variations in exons caused changes of amino acid sequence (Supplementary Table ). Twenty pairs of primers were designed for InDels validation (Supplementary Table ). Seven pairs of primers were not amplified PCR production and the rest of 13 primers produced single band. The PCR products were sequenced and shown exactly same with our BSA-sequencing data (Supplementary Figure ). The candidate genes in the CRd region were compared with 244 resistance genes in B. rapa[5]. Four resistance genes were identified which encode TIR-NBS-LRR protein, including Bra001160, Bra001161, Bra001162, and Bra001175 with 20, 4, 42, and 81 sequence variations, respectively, in the exons. CRd mapping by NGS-based BSA and genetic mapping approaches. (A) Genome-wide ΔSNP index Manhattan plots and marker-trait association with 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 confidence levels. (B) ΔSNP index Manhattan plots in candidate region; the green rectangle indicates the core region. (C) Genetic/physical map of the region harboring CRd on chromosome 3. A core region of 577 kb was found on chromosome A03 with an extremely high average ΔSNP index of 0.9631 (Figure ). We designed eight SSR primer pairs within this region and screened for polymorphisms between the two parent lines. Five polymorphic markers were identified including yau301, yau389, yau376, yau106, and yau108; these were used to genotype 127 F2 individuals (Figure and Supplementary Table ). The Crr3 linked marker BRSTS61 showing polymorphism between “85-74” and “BJN3-1” was used to compare the mapping locations of CRd and Crr3. A genetic map of the region surrounding the CRd gene was constructed based on the genotypes of seven markers. CRd was mapped to a 1 cM region with the flanking markers yau389 and yau376 (Figure ). Alignment of marker sequences to the reference genome sequence of B. rapa revealed a physical distance between yau389 and yau376 of about 60 kb. CRd is located upstream of Crr3 was confirmed based on the physical position of Crr3 linked markers. CRd closely linked markers yau389 and yau376 were validated in natural population and the cultivars which harbor CRd gene all showed resistant to isolate “LAB-19” (Supplementary Figure and Supplementary Table ). Total four genes Bra001160, Bra001161, Bra001162, and Bra001175 which encode TIR-NBS-LRR protein were identified in the CRd candidate region. Total four genes Bra001160, Bra001161, Bra001162, and Bra001175 which encode TIR-NBS-LRR protein were identified in the CRd candidate region. To examine the expression characteristics of these four genes from “85-74” and “BJN3-1,” we performed RT-PCR analysis with a common primer set (18S) and resistance gene-specific primer (Supplementary Table ). As shown in Figure , 18S expressed in “85-74” and “BJN3-1” from 0 DAI to 13 DAI. Bra001160, Bra001161, and Bra001175 were more highly expressed in “85-74” at 13 DAI. Bra001162 was more highly expressed in “BJN3-1” at 7 DAI, 10 DAI, and 13 DAI. Expression levels of Bra001160, Bra001161, Bra001162, and Bra001175 genes in roots of “85-74” and “BJN3-1.”

Discussion

In this study, we used an NGS-based BSA strategy to map the novel CR gene CRd in an F2 population of B. rapa. Previously identified CR loci or genes in B. rapa have been associated with resistance to specific pathotypes of P. brassicae. For instance, the CRa gene confers resistance to P. brassicae isolate M85, which belongs to race 2 according to Williams’s classification (Williams, 1966; Ueno et al., 2012), whereas CRb (Piao et al., 2004) and Crr1 (Hatakeyama et al., 2013) confer resistance to race 4 and Ano-01 (an unknown pathotype), respectively. In the present study, “85-74” showed resistance to all pathotypes of race 2, 4, 7, and 11, except for “LAB-10” (race 2) and “LNND-2” (race 4). “CR-73” showed resistance to all tested isolates except to “LAB-19” (race 4). The variable responses to “LAB-19,” “LAB-10,” and “LNND-2” indicate that “85-74” and “CR-73” have distinct genetic backgrounds. Moreover, “CR-75” was identified carrying CRa and CRb using published CR loci-/gene linked markers and “CR Shinki” harbored CRa and CRb also. However, “CR-75” showed resistant to “AHHS-62” while “CR Shinki” not which indicates that “CR-75” is highly possible carrying other unknown CR gene/genes need to explore through genetic mapping. A given pathotype identified according to Williams’s classification system is expected to produce the same response in hosts; however, pathotype 4 had different infectivity in the Chinese cabbage germplasm inoculation tests. “LAB-7” and “LAB-10” were identified as pathotype 2; however, only the latter infected “85-74” successfully. These results indicate that the Williams’s classification system has a limited capacity for distinguishing co-existing isolates. Clubroot disease is threating all of the brassica crops. To reduce the economic losses, CR genes have been investigated in canola (Rcr1 and Rcr4, Yu et al., 2016, 2017), cabbage (Anju1, Anju2, Anju4, and GC1, Tomita et al., 2013), and Chinese cabbage (CRa, Crr1, and CRb, Ueno et al., 2012; Hatakeyama et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014.) These CR genes and their closely linked markers exploration in brassica crops have been greatly improved the CR breading through MAS strategy. Breeding of CR cultivars is the most environment friendliness and economically effective strategy for controlling clubroot. Plant disease resistance genes are abundant and are clustered together in the genome (Michelmore and Meyers, 1998; Wang et al., 2011). Most of the CR loci or resistance genes reported to date in B. rapa are clustered on chromosome A03 in two specific genomic regions (CRa, CRb, and QS_B3.1 at one locus and CRk and Crr3 at another). CRd is in the same genomic region as CRk and Crr3. The CRk linked marker HC688 was not polymorphic in our population. The sequences of the Crr3 linked markers BrSTS78 and BrSTS33 were searched in the Ensemble Genome database to further distinguish between CRd and Crr3, and were found to be located at 15.091 and 15.331 Mb, respectively, on chromosome A03. Meanwhile, CRd was mapped to between yau389 (15.029 Mb) and yau376 (15.089 Mb). These results confirm that CRd is located upstream of Crr3. Moreover, “85-74” and “CR-73” (harbor Crr3 resistant gene) showed different responses to “LAB-19,” “LAB-10,” and “LNND-2.” Thus, CRd is possible to be a novel CR gene distinct from those previously identified on chromosome A03 of B. rapa. Most of the disease resistance genes encoding NBS-LRR proteins confer pathogen race-specific resistance (Flor, 1956; Meyers et al., 2003). It was previously reported that CRa and Crr1 encode TIR-NBS-LRR protein. In the present study, Bra001162 was more highly expressed in “BJN3-1” at 7 DAI, 10 DAI, and 13 DAI indicated that Bra001162 may not associate with CR, while Bra001160, Bra001161, and Bra001175 were more highly expressed in “85-74” than “BJN3-1” at 13 DAI (Figure ). Therefore, Bra001160, Bra001161, and Bra001175 are highly possible to be candidate genes of CRd. These results will be helpful for the CRd gene cloning and validation of transgenic lines in future study. CRd was mapped into a 1 cM region on chromosome A03 of the B. rapa genome in a small F2 segregant population. However, it was found to be anchored to a relatively short 60 kb region based on the reference genome of B. rapa, indicating the presence of a recombination hotspot at this location. Previously studies have shown that such hotspots in Arabidopsis thaliana are accession-specific or vary depending on the cross (Drouaud et al., 2006, 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Salomé et al., 2012). It is also possible that “85-74” harbors a large insertion that is not present in the reference genome.

Conclusion

We identified the CRd gene in a CR population of B. rapa. Our findings may be useful for breeding cultivars of Chinese cabbage and other Brassica crops with broad-spectrum resistance to multiple P. brassicae pathotypes.

Author Contributions

WP analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. PF performed the experiments and data analysis. XL and ZZ helped in the data analysis and experiments. ZP conceived the study, participated in its coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

Clubroot disease resistance test of Chinese cabbage germplasms and pathotypes identification using Williams’ clubroot differential set.

MaterialsCR gene/genesLocal pathogens
AHXC-68LAB-16LNXM-1AHHS-62LAB-19LNND-2LAB-10LAB-7HBLC-31AHHS-65HBSY-32
CR ShinkiCra, CRb--++-------
CR-75Cra, CRb--+--------
CR-26unknown---+-------
CR-73CRk, Crr3----+------
85-74CRd-----++----
CR-77Crr1, Cra-----------
CR-20Crr1, Cra-----------
BJN3-1None+++++++++++
Jersey Queen++++++++++-
Badger shipper+++++++++++
Laurentian++++++++--+
Wilhelmsburger++++++----+
Table 2

Genetic analysis of clubroot resistance in the F2 population.

MaterialsResistant plantsSusceptible plantsχ2χ2 0.05
“85-74”300
“BJN3-1”029
F1 population300
F2 population3211060.0073.841
Table 3

Quality control of sequencing data.

Sample“85-74”“BJN3-1”R-poolS-pool
Raw reads250,343,998249,577,324250,291,386249,507,094
Raw bases37,551,599,70037,436,598,60037,543,707,90037,426,064,100
Clean reads243,624,928243,358,774244,980,058243,367,696
Clean bases36,543,739,20036,503,816,10036,747,008,70036,505,154,400
Clean read rate (%)97.3297.5197.8897.54
Low-quality reads4,481,4824,157,5063,183,9203,906,490
Low-quality read rate (%)1.791.671.271.57
Ns reads68,71870,2241,54270,616
Ns read rate (%)0.030.0300.03
Adapter-polluted reads2,168,8701,990,8202,125,8662,162,292
Adapter-polluted read rate (%)0.870.80.850.87
Raw Q30 base rate (%)89.0989.4691.6889.9
Clean Q30 base rate (%)9090.392.3490.71
  36 in total

1.  The recombination landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana F2 populations.

Authors:  P A Salomé; K Bomblies; J Fitz; R A E Laitinen; N Warthmann; L Yant; D Weigel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Development of a high density integrated reference genetic linkage map for the multinational Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project.

Authors:  Xiaonan Li; Nirala Ramchiary; Su Ryun Choi; Dan Van Nguyen; Md Jamil Hossain; Hyeon Kook Yang; Yong Pyo Lim
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  Simple sequence repeat-based comparative genomics between Brassica rapa and Arabidopsis thaliana: the genetic origin of clubroot resistance.

Authors:  Keita Suwabe; Hikaru Tsukazaki; Hiroyuki Iketani; Katsunori Hatakeyama; Masatoshi Kondo; Miyuki Fujimura; Tsukasa Nunome; Hiroyuki Fukuoka; Masashi Hirai; Satoru Matsumoto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Clusters of resistance genes in plants evolve by divergent selection and a birth-and-death process.

Authors:  R W Michelmore; B C Meyers
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  A novel locus for clubroot resistance in Brassica rapa and its linkage markers.

Authors:  M Hirai; T Harada; N Kubo; M Tsukada; K Suwabe; S Matsumoto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genetic mapping of clubroot resistance genes in oilseed rape.

Authors:  S Werner; E Diederichsen; M Frauen; J Schondelmaier; C Jung
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Xiaowu Wang; Hanzhong Wang; Jun Wang; Rifei Sun; Jian Wu; Shengyi Liu; Yinqi Bai; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Ian Bancroft; Feng Cheng; Sanwen Huang; Xixiang Li; Wei Hua; Junyi Wang; Xiyin Wang; Michael Freeling; J Chris Pires; Andrew H Paterson; Boulos Chalhoub; Bo Wang; Alice Hayward; Andrew G Sharpe; Beom-Seok Park; Bernd Weisshaar; Binghang Liu; Bo Li; Bo Liu; Chaobo Tong; Chi Song; Christopher Duran; Chunfang Peng; Chunyu Geng; Chushin Koh; Chuyu Lin; David Edwards; Desheng Mu; Di Shen; Eleni Soumpourou; Fei Li; Fiona Fraser; Gavin Conant; Gilles Lassalle; Graham J King; Guusje Bonnema; Haibao Tang; Haiping Wang; Harry Belcram; Heling Zhou; Hideki Hirakawa; Hiroshi Abe; Hui Guo; Hui Wang; Huizhe Jin; Isobel A P Parkin; Jacqueline Batley; Jeong-Sun Kim; Jérémy Just; Jianwen Li; Jiaohui Xu; Jie Deng; Jin A Kim; Jingping Li; Jingyin Yu; Jinling Meng; Jinpeng Wang; Jiumeng Min; Julie Poulain; Jun Wang; Katsunori Hatakeyama; Kui Wu; Li Wang; Lu Fang; Martin Trick; Matthew G Links; Meixia Zhao; Mina Jin; Nirala Ramchiary; Nizar Drou; Paul J Berkman; Qingle Cai; Quanfei Huang; Ruiqiang Li; Satoshi Tabata; Shifeng Cheng; Shu Zhang; Shujiang Zhang; Shunmou Huang; Shusei Sato; Silong Sun; Soo-Jin Kwon; Su-Ryun Choi; Tae-Ho Lee; Wei Fan; Xiang Zhao; Xu Tan; Xun Xu; Yan Wang; Yang Qiu; Ye Yin; Yingrui Li; Yongchen Du; Yongcui Liao; Yongpyo Lim; Yoshihiro Narusaka; Yupeng Wang; Zhenyi Wang; Zhenyu Li; Zhiwen Wang; Zhiyong Xiong; Zhonghua Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Combining SNP discovery from next-generation sequencing data with bulked segregant analysis (BSA) to fine-map genes in polyploid wheat.

Authors:  Martin Trick; Nikolai Maria Adamski; Sarah G Mugford; Cong-Cong Jiang; Melanie Febrer; Cristobal Uauy
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Combining Next Generation Sequencing with Bulked Segregant Analysis to Fine Map a Stem Moisture Locus in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench).

Authors:  Yucui Han; Peng Lv; Shenglin Hou; Suying Li; Guisu Ji; Xue Ma; Ruiheng Du; Guoqing Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fine Mapping of a Clubroot Resistance Gene in Chinese Cabbage Using SNP Markers Identified from Bulked Segregant RNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Zhen Huang; Gary Peng; Xunjia Liu; Abhinandan Deora; Kevin C Falk; Bruce D Gossen; Mary R McDonald; Fengqun Yu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  25 in total

1.  Utilization of Ogura CMS germplasm with the clubroot resistance gene by fertility restoration and cytoplasm replacement in Brassica oleracea L.

Authors:  Wenjing Ren; Zhiyuan Li; Fengqing Han; Bin Zhang; Xing Li; Zhiyuan Fang; Limei Yang; Mu Zhuang; Honghao Lv; Yumei Liu; Yong Wang; Hailong Yu; Yangyong Zhang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.793

Review 2.  An update on the arsenal: mining resistance genes for disease management of Brassica crops in the genomic era.

Authors:  Honghao Lv; Zhiyuan Fang; Limei Yang; Yangyong Zhang; Yong Wang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  Transcriptomic analysis reveals the mechanism of host growth promotion by endophytic fungus of Rumex gmelinii Turcz.

Authors:  Changhong Ding; Shouyu Wang; Jiabin Li; Zhenyue Wang
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Genome-Wide Mapping of Loci Associated With Resistance to Clubroot in Brassica napus ssp. napobrassica (Rutabaga) Accessions From Nordic Countries.

Authors:  Rudolph Fredua-Agyeman; Zhiyu Yu; Sheau-Fang Hwang; Stephen E Strelkov
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Association of Clubroot Resistance Locus PbBa8.1 With a Linkage Drag of High Erucic Acid Content in the Seed of the European Turnip.

Authors:  Zongxiang Zhan; Yingfen Jiang; Nadil Shah; Zhaoke Hou; Yuanwei Zhou; Bicheng Dun; Shisheng Li; Li Zhu; Zaiyun Li; Zhongyun Piao; Chunyu Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  iTRAQ-based quantitative analysis reveals proteomic changes in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) in response to Plasmodiophora brassicae infection.

Authors:  Mei Lan; Guoliang Li; Jingfeng Hu; Hongli Yang; Liqin Zhang; Xuezhong Xu; Jiajia Liu; Jiangming He; Rifei Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Identification of a genomic region controlling thermotolerance at flowering in maize using a combination of whole genomic re-sequencing and bulked segregant analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Jian Shi; Chunhong Qiu; Yunhe Wang; Shamsur Rehman; Shuaishuai Yu; Shijie Huang; Chen He; Wanyi Wang; Hongyi Chen; Chen Chen; Chuanhong Wang; Zhen Tao; Peijin Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Clubroot resistance derived from the European Brassica napus cv. 'Tosca' is not effective against virulent Plasmodiophora brassicae isolates from Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Rudolph Fredua-Agyeman; Sheau-Fang Hwang; Hui Zhang; Igor Falak; Xiuqiang Huang; Stephen E Strelkov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping of Clubroot Resistance and Plasmodiophora brassicae Pathotype Banglim-Specific Marker Development in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Su Ryun Choi; Sang Heon Oh; Sushil Satish Chhapekar; Vignesh Dhandapani; Chang Yeol Lee; Jana Jeevan Rameneni; Yinbo Ma; Gyung Ja Choi; Soo-Seong Lee; Yong Pyo Lim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Analysing the genetic architecture of clubroot resistance variation in Brassica napus by associative transcriptomics.

Authors:  Ondrej Hejna; Lenka Havlickova; Zhesi He; Ian Bancroft; Vladislav Curn
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 2.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.