| Literature DB >> 29868073 |
Effi Haque1, Hiroaki Taniguchi2, Md Mahmudul Hassan3,4, Pankaj Bhowmik5, M Rezaul Karim6, Magdalena Śmiech2, Kaijun Zhao7, Mahfuzur Rahman8, Tofazzal Islam1,8.
Abstract
The world population is expected to increase from 7.3 to 9.7 billion by 2050. Pest outbreak and increased abiotic stresses due to climate change pose a high risk to tropical crop production. Although conventional breeding techniques have significantly increased crop production and yield, new approaches are required to further improve crop production in order to meet the global growing demand for food. The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein9) genome editing technology has shown great promise for quickly addressing emerging challenges in agriculture. It can be used to precisely modify genome sequence of any organism including plants to achieve the desired trait. Compared to other genome editing tools such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), CRISPR/Cas9 is faster, cheaper, precise and highly efficient in editing genomes even at the multiplex level. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in editing the plant genome is emerging rapidly. The CRISPR/Cas9 is becoming a user-friendly tool for development of non-transgenic genome edited crop plants to counteract harmful effects from climate change and ensure future food security of increasing population in tropical countries. This review updates current knowledge and potentials of CRISPR/Cas9 for improvement of crops cultivated in tropical climates to gain resiliency against emerging pests and abiotic stresses.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; blast; climate change; disease; food security; genetic engineering; genome editing; tropical crops
Year: 2018 PMID: 29868073 PMCID: PMC5952327 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Some examples of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in crop plants cultivated in the tropical climates for development of tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses.
| Banana | Phytoene desaturase | Trial for CRIPSR | Gene disruption | Decreased chlorophyll and total carotenoid contents | Kaur et al., |
| Cassava | Phytoene desaturase | Trial for CRIPSR | Gene disruption | Observation of albino phenotype | Odipio et al., |
| Cassava | Resistance to cassava brown streak disease | Gene disruption | Elevated resistance to cassava brown streak disease | Gomez et al., | |
| Resistance to the cacao pathogen | Gene disruption | Increased resistance to infection with the cacao pathogen | Fister et al., | ||
| Cotton | CLCuD IR and Rep | Resistance to cotton leaf curl disease | Viral gene disruption | Targeted cleavage of mixed | Iqbal et al., |
| Rice | Resistance to bacterial blight | Promoter disruption | The promoter of the blight susceptibility gene was disrupted | Jiang et al., | |
| Rice | Resistance to rice blast | Gene disruption | Resistance to | Wang et al., | |
| Wheat | Resistance to powdery mildew | Gene disruption | The number of mildew microcolonies formed on the leaves was significantly reduced against the control and no apparent fungal growth was observed on the leaves of edited plants | Wang et al., | |
| Wheat | Trial for CRISPR | Gene disruption | Provide a deep insight about their functioning in abiotic stress response | Kim et al., |
Tropical plant genes that can be edited by the CRISPR/Cas9 technology to improve plant tolerance to the abiotic and biotic stresses.
| Avocado | Anthracnose disease resistance | Bill et al., | |
| Avocado | Backer et al., | ||
| Banana | Foc 4 TR4 and abiotic stresses (cold and salt) resistance | Miao et al., | |
| Banana | Wei et al., | ||
| Banana | Tripathi et al., | ||
| Banana | Abiotic stresses (cold and salt) and | Miao et al., | |
| Cassava | Díaz Tatis et al., | ||
| Cassava | Cassava bacterial blight (CBB), caused by | Yan et al., | |
| Cassava | Cassava bacterial blight (CBB) resistance | Li et al., | |
| Cassava | Cassava bacterial blight (CBB) resistance | Li X. et al., | |
| Cassava | Cassava bacterial blight (CBB) resistance | Wei et al., | |
| Cassava | Abiotic stresses (salt, osmosis, cold, drought) resistance | Ou et al., | |
| Cassava | Abiotic stress (drought) resistance | Ye et al., | |
| Coconut | Root wilt disease (RWD) resistance | Verma et al., | |
| Coconut | Coconut root (wilt) disease resistance | Rajesh et al., | |
| Cotton | Abiotic stress (drought) resistance | He et al., | |
| Cotton | Abiotic stress (drought) resistance | Dass et al., | |
| Cotton | Bacterial blight caused by | Cacas et al., | |
| Date palm | Abiotic stress (Cd and Cr) resistance | Chaâbene et al., | |
| Date palm | Abiotic stress (metals) resistance | Chaâbene et al., | |
| Papaya | Abiotic stresses (drought, heat and cold) resistance | Arroyo-Herrera et al., | |
| Papaya | Abiotic stresses (heat and cold) resistance | Figueroa-Yañez et al., | |
| Sugarcane | Smut ( | Su et al., | |
| Sugarcane | Smut ( | Su et al., | |
| Sugarcane | Abscisic acid (ABA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), and copper (Cu) stress resistance | Liu et al., | |
| Sugarcane | Smut and abiotic stresses (salt and heavy metal) resistance | Su et al., | |
| Sugarcane | Smut ( | Su et al., | |
| Sugarcane | Abiotic stresses (drought and chilling) resistance | Chen Y. et al., |