| Literature DB >> 29867433 |
Naoya Toriu1, Hiroki Mizuno1, Naoki Sawa1, Keiichi Sumida1, Tatsuya Suwabe1, Noriko Hayami1, Akinari Sekine1, Masayuki Yamanouchi1, Junichi Hoshino1,2, Kenmei Takaichi1,2, Motoko Yanagita3, Takuya Fujimaru4, Takayasu Mori4, Eisei Sohara4, Shinichi Uchida4, Yoshifumi Ubara1,2.
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy of everolimus in 3 patients who had huge renal angiomyolipomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. Two patients with large lipid-rich angiomyolipomas had a history of renal transarterial embolization for renal bleeding, but the effect had only been temporary and the embolized kidneys had continued to enlarge. In case 1, case 2, and case 3, total renal volume was respectively 3,891, 4,035, and 1,179 cm3 before administration of everolimus, decreasing to 3,016 (77%), 3,043 (75%), and 1,051 (89%) cm3 after 1 year of everolimus therapy and to 2,832 (73%), 3,209 (80%), and 1,102 (93%) cm3 after 3 years. New renal bleeding did not occur, but elevation of serum creatinine and urinary protein were noted in 2 patients. While previous reports have largely assessed the effect of everolimus for angiomyolipomas of < 10 cm in the longest diameter, our findings suggest that this drug might also be effective for huge lesions of > 20 cm in diameter. However, total renal volume still exceeds 2,000 cm3 in 2 of our patients, suggesting limited size reduction of lipid-rich angiomyolipomas. In addition, occurrence of everolimus-related nephropathy needs to be monitored carefully.Entities:
Keywords: Angiomyolipoma; Everolimus; Tuberous sclerosis complex
Year: 2018 PMID: 29867433 PMCID: PMC5981599 DOI: 10.1159/000488704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Oncol ISSN: 1662-6575
Clinical findings
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Normal range | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 baseline | 2014 1 year later | 2015 2 years later | 2016 3 years later | 2017 4 years later | 2014 baseline | 2015 1 year later | 2016 2 years later | 2017 3 years later | 2014 base line | 2015 1 year later | 2016 2 years later | 2017 3 years later | ||
| White blood cell count/μL | 7,300 | 4,300 | 5,400 | 5,300 | 5,800 | 4,900 | 4,200 | 4,500 | 4,600 | 6,800 | 5,300 | 5,700 | 7,300 | 3,200–7,900 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 10 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 11.1 | 12.2 | 11.2 | 12.8 | 11.9 | 11.4 | 12.3 | 13.1 | 12.3 | 12.8 | 11.3–15.0 |
| Platelet, ×1,000/μL | 272 | 237 | 165 | 179 | 126 | 315 | 298 | 342 | 31 | 275 | 351 | 284 | 319 | 155–350 |
| Total protein, g/dL | 7.5 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 6.9–8.4 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 3.3 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9–5.2 |
| Urea nitrogen, mg/dL | 11 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 23 | 15 | 12 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 8–21 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.85 | 0.94 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.27 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 0.46–0.78 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 57.1 | 50.8 | 36.1 | 39.9 | 35.9 | 106.0 | 107 | 102.9 | 95.3 | 59.7 | 48.7 | 48.5 | 49.2 | >90 |
| RBC per high-power field | <1 | 11–30 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 5–10 | 5–10 | 1–4 | <1 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 1–4 | <1 |
| Proteinuria, g/day | 0.14 | 0.71 | 0.98 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.32 | <1 |
| NAG, IU/gCr | 5.7 | n/a | 3.9 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 3.5 | n/a | n/a | 14.7 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0.8–5.0 |
| α1MG, mg/L | 12.4 | n/a | 13.79 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.19 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 14.6 | 10.3 | 0.6–8.8 |
| β2MG, mg/L | 1.4 | n/a | 1.0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | n/a | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.1–1.9 |
| Maximum diameter of RAML, cm | 21.8 | 18.5 | 17.3 | 18.8 | 18.5 | 28.0 | 22.1 | 23.1 | 23.9 | 12.7 | 11.5 | 11.8 | 120.6 | |
| Total volume of RAML, cm3 | 3,891 | 3,016 | 2,651 | 2,832 | 2,674 | 4,035 | 3,043 | 3,209 | 3,246 | 1,179 | 1,051 | 1,043 | 1,102 | |
| Total volume/baseline volume ×100, % | 100 | 77 | 68 | 73 | 69 | 100 | 75 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 89 | 88 | 93 | |
Fig. 1Case 1. a, b Computed tomography (CT) reveals huge RAMLs before initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 21.8 cm. c CT shows huge RAMLs at 1 year after initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 18.5 cm. d CT shows huge RAMLs at 3 years after initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 17.3 cm.
Baseline patients’ characteristics
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 48 | 29 | 36 |
| Sex | female | female | female |
| ECOG performance states | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Mental retardation | negative | negative | negative |
| Skin | positive (facial angiofibromas) | positive (facial angiofibromas) | positive (facial angiofibromas) |
| Brain | negative | positive (epilepsy) | positive (SEN) |
| Lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis | positive | positive | positive |
| Retinal hamartoma | positive | Positive | positive |
| Liver angiomyolipoma | positive | negative | positive |
| Cardiac rhabdomyoma | negative | negative | negative |
| Genetic analysis | TSC2 | negative | TSC2 |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SEN, subependymal nodule.
Fig. 2Case 2. a, b Computed tomography (CT) reveals huge RAMLs before initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 28 cm. c CT shows huge RAMLs at 1 year after initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 22.1 cm. d CT shows huge RAMLs at 3 years after initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 23.1 cm.
Fig. 3Case 3. a, b Computed tomography (CT) reveals huge RAMLs before initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 12.7 cm. c CT shows huge RAMLs at 1 year after initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 11.5 cm. d CT shows huge RAMLs at 3 years after initiation of everolimus therapy. The maximum diameter of the biggest RAML (asterisk) is 12.1 cm.