Literature DB >> 29867299

Does use of long-term care differ between occupational classes among the oldest old? Vitality 90 + Study.

Linda Enroth1, Mari Aaltonen1, Jani Raitanen1,2, Lily Nosraty1, Marja Jylhä1.   

Abstract

Long-term care (LTC) use increases with ageing due to an age-related increase in disability. Both the levels of disability and social resources vary among socioeconomic groups. The association of socioeconomic status with LTC use is largely unexplored for the oldest old. This study examined how occupational class is associated with LTC use among nonagenarians in the context of universal care coverage. A population-based prospective cohort study with 2862 participants who answered the Vitality 90 + Study surveys in 2001, 2003, 2007, or 2010 in Tampere, Finland, was combined with national register data on LTC use. LTC use in total and separately for publicly and privately provided LTC facilities was assessed in a cross-sectional setting and during the 34-month follow-up by using logistic regression and competing-risks regression methods. Functional status, multimorbidity, family relations, and help at home were controlled. In total or public LTC use, only a few differences between occupational classes were found at baseline. However, upper non-manuals used more private LTC than lower non-manuals (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.85), skilled manuals (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62), or housewives (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74). There were no statistically significant differences in entering any kind of LTC after adjustments for all independent variables. During the study period, the share of privately provided care out of all LTC increased and the upper non-manuals no more used private care more than other groups. This study underlines the importance of following the structural changes in LTC provision to guarantee that the need for LTC is met equally for all socioeconomic groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Institutionalisation; Mortality; Oldest old; Socioeconomic factors

Year:  2017        PMID: 29867299      PMCID: PMC5971028          DOI: 10.1007/s10433-017-0445-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ageing        ISSN: 1613-9372


  28 in total

1.  Why is housing tenure associated with a lower risk of admission to a nursing or residential home? Wealth, health and the incentive to keep 'my home'.

Authors:  Mark McCann; Emily Grundy; Dermot O'Reilly
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Privatization processes in health care in Europe--a move in the right direction, a 'trendy' option, or a step back?

Authors:  Tit Albreht
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Long-term care is increasingly concentrated in the last years of life: a change from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Leena Forma; Mari Aaltonen; Jutta Pulkki; Jani Raitanen; Pekka Rissanen; Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  What determines the need for nursing home admission in a universally insured population?

Authors:  C Mustard; M Finlayson; S Derksen; J M Berthelot
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1999-10

5.  Is socioeconomic status a predictor of mortality in nonagenarians? The vitality 90+ study.

Authors:  Linda Enroth; Jani Raitanen; Antti Hervonen; Lily Nosraty; Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Transitions in health and social service system at the end of life.

Authors:  Mari Aaltonen; Leena Forma; Pekka Rissanen; Jani Raitanen; Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2010-07-10

7.  Gender, living arrangements, and social circumstances as determinants of entry into and exit from long-term institutional care at older ages: a 6-year follow-up study of older Finns.

Authors:  Pekka Martikainen; Heta Moustgaard; Michael Murphy; Elina K Einiö; Seppo Koskinen; Tuija Martelin; Anja Noro
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-03-19

8.  Socio-demographic variations in moves to institutional care 1991-2001: a record linkage study from England and Wales.

Authors:  Emily Grundy; Mark Jitlal
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1).

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The effects of socio-economic status and physical health on the long-term care needs of Japanese urban elderly: a chronological study.

Authors:  Suwen Yang; Tanji Hoshi; Naoko Nakayama; Shuo Wang; Fanlei Kong
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.674

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between Socioeconomic Status, Physical Health and Need for Long-term Care among the Chinese Elderly.

Authors:  Fanlei Kong; Lingzhong Xu; Mei Kong; Shixue Li; Chengchao Zhou; Jianghua Zhang; Bin Ai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Predictive factors for entry to long-term residential care in octogenarian Māori and non-Māori in New Zealand, LiLACS NZ cohort.

Authors:  Marycarol Holdaway; Janine Wiles; Ngaire Kerse; Zhenqiang Wu; Simon Moyes; Martin J Connolly; Oliver Menzies; Ruth Teh; Marama Muru-Lanning; Merryn Gott; Joanna B Broad
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.