Literature DB >> 29866945

The Importance of Distinguishing Sporadic Cancers from Those Related to Cancer Predisposing Germline Mutations.

Steven Sorscher1.   

Abstract

Choosing the optimal therapy for a patient's cancer has long been based on whether the cancer demonstrates a predictive marker of efficacy. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has now approved use of a targeted therapy based solely on tumor molecular markers (pembrolizumab for tumors with deficient mismatch repair [MMR] and high microsatellite instability [MSI]) and approved another therapy based solely on a germline mutation as the predictive marker of benefit (olaparib for BRCA carriers with ovarian or breast cancer) [New Engl J Med 2017;377:1409-1412, N Engl J Med 2012;366:1382-1392, N Eng J Med 2017;377:523-533].Here, a patient is presented with a molecular diagnosis of Lynch syndrome and with breast cancer. Yet the breast cancer showed proficient expression of the same MMR gene found to be mutated in her germline testing. The case underscores the importance of tumor testing for MMR and MSI and of not assuming that the tumor is related to the Lynch syndrome rather than being sporadic. This is particularly true in patients with cancers (e.g., breast cancer) whose association with Lynch syndrome is not well established.The case presented also underscores the importance of considering next-generation sequencing of the tumor when the therapies approved are based on a germline mutation being the predictive marker. For example, the FDA-approved use of the PARP inhibitor olaparib is for ovarian or breast cancers in patients harboring a BRCA germline mutation [N Engl J Med 2012;366:1382-1392, N Eng J Med 2017;377:523-533]. Yet patients with tumors lacking BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or lacking other evidence of probable loss of normal BRCA gene product expression might be less likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy, because the efficacy of PARP inhibitor therapy in patients with germline BRCA mutations would likely be predicated upon BRCA LOH in their tumors. KEY POINTS: Cancers in patients with germline mutations may be sporadic and unrelated to the germline mutation.Lynch syndrome is due to a germline mutated mismatch repair (MMR) gene. Cancers resulting from the germline MMR gene mutation as the predisposing event would be expected to be MMR deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). Sporadic cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome would be expected to be MMR proficient or microsatellite stable.Pembrolizumab is only approved for solid tumors demonstrating dMMR/MSI-H. Thus, whether the cancer tissue of origin is clearly associated with Lynch syndrome or not yet clearly established as a Lynch syndrome-related cancer (e.g., breast cancer), establishing the tumor to be dMMR/MSI-H is necessary to predict possible benefit and endorse the use of pembrolizumab.Ovarian cancers that develop in BRCA germline mutation carriers are so often related to the inherited mutated BRCA as the predisposing factor that testing the tumor for the footprint of BRCA-related ovarian cancer (BRCA loss of heterozygosity) is not necessary for use of the PARP inhibitor therapy olaparib. Future studies that include tumor evaluation for normal BRCA expression or surrogates of normal BRCA gene product expression might help determine which patients harboring a germline BRCA mutation are most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866945      PMCID: PMC6291335          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  13 in total

1.  Clearer picture of PMS2-associated lynch syndrome is emerging.

Authors:  Molly S Daniels; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Germline promoter hypermethylation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is not present in hereditary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M Rodríguez-Balada; B Roig; M Melé; M Salvat; L Martorell; J Borràs; J Gumà
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Microsatellite Instability: A Predictive Biomarker for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Liisa Chang; Minna Chang; Hanna M Chang; Fuju Chang
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2018-02

4.  Methylation not a frequent "second hit" in tumors with germline BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Amy M Dworkin; Andrew D Spearman; Stephanie Y Tseng; Kevin Sweet; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation.

Authors:  Mark Robson; Seock-Ah Im; Elżbieta Senkus; Binghe Xu; Susan M Domchek; Norikazu Masuda; Suzette Delaloge; Wei Li; Nadine Tung; Anne Armstrong; Wenting Wu; Carsten Goessl; Sarah Runswick; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jinru Shia
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Microsatellite instability in hereditary and sporadic breast cancers.

Authors:  Camilo Adem; Cheryl L Soderberg; Julie M Cunningham; Carol Reynolds; Thomas J Sebo; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lynn C Hartmann; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Breast carcinoma and Lynch syndrome: molecular analysis of tumors arising in mutation carriers, non-carriers, and sporadic cases.

Authors:  Johanna E Lotsari; Annette Gylling; Wael M Abdel-Rahman; Taina T Nieminen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Marjukka Friman; Reino Pitkänen; Markku Aarnio; Heikki J Järvinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Teijo Kuopio; Päivi Peltomäki
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  BRCA locus-specific loss of heterozygosity in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

Authors:  Kara N Maxwell; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Brandon M Wenz; Daniel De Sloover; John Pluta; Lyndsey Emery; Amanda Barrett; Adam A Kraya; Ioannis N Anastopoulos; Shun Yu; Yuchao Jiang; Hao Chen; Nancy R Zhang; Nicole Hackman; Kurt D'Andrea; Robert Daber; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Nandita Mitra; Michael Feldman; Susan M Domchek; Katherine L Nathanson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Risk of breast cancer in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Noralane M Lindor; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lynch Syndrome Germline Mutations in Breast Cancer: Next Generation Sequencing Case-Control Study of 1,263 Participants.

Authors:  Aleksey G Nikitin; Daria A Chudakova; Rafael F Enikeev; Dina Sakaeva; Maxim Druzhkov; Leyla H Shigapova; Olga I Brovkina; Elena I Shagimardanova; Oleg A Gusev; Marat G Gordiev
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.