Literature DB >> 29866525

Hounsfield unit of screw trajectory as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening after single level lumbar interbody fusion.

Yusuke Sakai1, Shota Takenaka1, Yohei Matsuo2, Hiroyasu Fujiwara2, Hirotsugu Honda2, Takahiro Makino1, Takashi Kaito3.   

Abstract

OBJECT: This study aims to clarify the clinical potential of Hounsfield unit (HU), measured on computed tomography (CT) images, as a predictor of pedicle screw (PS) loosening, compared to bone mineral density (BMD).
METHODS: A total of 206 screws in 52 patients (21 men and 31 women; mean age 68.2 years) were analyzed retrospectively. The screws were classified into two groups depending on their screw loosening status on 3-month follow-up CT (loosening screw group vs. non-loosening screw group). Preoperative HU of the trajectory was evaluated by superimposing preoperative and postoperative CT images using three-dimensional image analysis software. Age, sex, body mass index, screw size, BMD of lumbar, and HU of screw trajectory were analyzed in association with screw loosening. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and the thresholds for PS loosening risk factors were evaluated using a continuous numerical variable and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine the diagnostic performance, and values > 0.75 were considered to represent good performance.
RESULTS: The loosening screw group contained 24 screws (12%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the significant independent risk factors were not BMD but male sex [P = 0.028; odds ratio (OR) 2.852, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.120-7.258] and HU of screw trajectory (P = 0.006; OR 0.989, 95% CI 0.980-0.997). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the AUC for HU of screw trajectory for women was 0.880 (95% CI 0.798-0.961). The cutoff value was 153.5. AUC for men was 0.635 (95% CI 0.449-0.821), which was not considered to be a good performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Low HU of screw trajectories was identified as a risk factor of PS loosening for women. For female patients with low HU, additional augmentation is recommended to prevent PS loosening.
Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866525     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  11 in total

1.  [CT value of vertebral body predicting Cage subsidence after stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Lei Zhou; Chao Liu; Chao Yuan; Jian Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-15

2.  The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Zhuang Zhang; Tianhang Xie; Zhetao Song; Yueming Song; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Deterioration of the fixation segment's stress distribution and the strength reduction of screw holding position together cause screw loosening in ALSR fixed OLIF patients with poor BMD.

Authors:  Jing-Chi Li; Zhi-Qiang Yang; Tian-Hang Xie; Zhe-Tao Song; Yue-Ming Song; Jian-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-30

4.  The association between lumbar paraspinal muscle functional cross-sectional area on MRI and regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  E Chiapparelli; I Okano; D Adl Amini; J Zhu; S N Salzmann; E T Tan; M Moser; O C Sax; C Echeverri; L Oezel; J Shue; A A Sama; F P Cammisa; F P Girardi; A P Hughes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 5.071

5.  Opportunistic Computed Tomography and Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Matthew Shirley; Nathan Wanderman; Tony Keaveny; Paul Anderson; Brett A Freedman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-28

Review 6.  A Review and Clinical Perspective of the Impact of Osteoporosis on the Spine.

Authors:  Bayard C Carlson; William A Robinson; Nathan R Wanderman; Arjun S Sebastian; Ahmad Nassr; Brett A Freedman; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-17

7.  The effect of denosumab on pedicle screw fixation: a prospective 2-year longitudinal study using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Soji Tani; Koji Ishikawa; Yoshifumi Kudo; Koki Tsuchiya; Akira Matsuoka; Hiroshi Maruyama; Haruka Emori; Ryo Yamamura; Chikara Hayakawa; Masaya Sekimizu; Yusuke Oshita; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Toshiyuki Shirahata; Takashi Nagai; Tomoaki Toyone; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  The Effect of Hounsfield Unit Value with Conventional Computed Tomography and Intraoperative Distraction on Postoperative Intervertebral Height Reduction in Patients Following Stand-Alone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Jun Seok Lee; Dong Wuk Son; Su Hun Lee; Sung Soon Ki; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song; Joon Bum Woo; Young Ha Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-12-29

9.  A study of screw placement to obtain the optimal pull-out resistance of lumbar pedicle screws-analysis of Hounsfield units measurements based on computed tomography.

Authors:  Dachuan Li; Chi Sun; Jianyuan Jiang; Feizhou Lu; Xinlei Xia; Hongli Wang; Fei Zou; Xiaosheng Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Comparison of the Pull-Out Strength between a Novel Micro-Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Lei Qian; Weidong Chen; Peng Li; Dongbin Qu; Wenjie Liang; Minghui Zheng; Jun Ouyang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.