Literature DB >> 29866446

Development, validity and reliability of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale - Spanish version.

Miguel Simancas-Pallares1, Mike T John2, Swati Prodduturu2, William A Rush3, Christopher J Enstad3, Patricia Lenton4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a Spanish version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-Sp) and to determine its psychometric properties in dental patients.
METHODS: We performed a validation study for OES development and validation into Spanish. In the development phase, eight individuals participated in the translation process (cross-cultural adaptation) following the PROMIS methodology. In the validation phase, 331 dental patients (age mean±sd: 42.9±12.3years, 59 % female) from the HealthPartners dental clinics in Minnesota, USA responded to a survey of Spanish speaking patients (n=540, response rate: 61 %). We first explored dimensionality by means of exploratory factor analysis and scree plot, and then we computed reliability measures with the Cronbach's alpha statistic. Finally, we assessed convergent validity by computing Pearson/Spearman rank correlations between OES-Sp and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-based orofacial appearance measures. All statistical procedures were performed using Stata v.13 for Windows (StataCorp).
RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis provided evidence that a single factor represents the Spanish OES version. Score reliability was high with Cronbach's alpha statistic of 0.95 (lower limit of the 95 % CI: 0.94). Score validity was sufficient indicated by Pearson and Spearman rank correlations between -0.53 and -0.69 (all 95 % confidence intervals: less than ± 0.10).
CONCLUSIONS: OES is a valuable instrument to measure the orofacial appearance construct for Spanish-speaking populations. OES was concluded to be unidimensional with excellent score reliability and sufficient convergent score validity when compared with other Orofacial Appearance measures. Our results suggest that OES could be used in Spanish-speaking patients, an important and growing population around the globe.
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental esthetics; Factor analysis; Psychometrics; Validation studies

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866446      PMCID: PMC6195834          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont Res        ISSN: 1883-1958            Impact factor:   4.642


  28 in total

1.  Normative values for the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale in Sweden.

Authors:  P Larsson; M T John; K Nilner; T List
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Dental esthetics and oral health-related quality of life in young adults.

Authors:  Gerald I Isiekwe; Oyinkan O Sofola; Olanrewaju O Onigbogi; Ifeoma L Utomi; Oluwatosin O Sanu; Oluranti O daCosta
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Janice S Ellis; Nanita D Pelekis; J Mark Thomason
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system.

Authors:  A E Bonomi; D F Cella; E A Hahn; K Bjordal; B Sperner-Unterweger; L Gangeri; B Bergman; J Willems-Groot; P Hanquet; R Zittoun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.

Authors:  Diane Wild; Alyson Grove; Mona Martin; Sonya Eremenco; Sandra McElroy; Aneesa Verjee-Lorenz; Pennifer Erikson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Sanja Peršić; Asja Čelebić
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile.

Authors:  G D Slade; A J Spencer
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.349

8.  Influences on preschool children's oral health-related quality of life as reported by English and Spanish-speaking parents and caregivers.

Authors:  Catherine D Born; Kimon Divaris; Leslie P Zeldin; R Gary Rozier
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.821

9.  Validation of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in the general population.

Authors:  Mike T John; Pernilla Larsson; Krister Nilner; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Thomas List
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.

Authors:  Venera Bimbashi; Asja Čelebić; Gloria Staka; Flurije Hoxha; Sanja Peršić; Nikola Petričević
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  8 in total

1.  Validation of the Chinese version of the Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ).

Authors:  Meng-Ying Li; Song-Lin He; Jin-Hua Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).

Authors:  Edoardo Rella; Paolo De Angelis; Tiziano Nardella; Antonio D'Addona; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics on dental patients.

Authors:  Lucas Arrais Campos; Mariana Andrade Costa; Fernanda Saullome Sampaio Bonafé; João Marôco; Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  Should the frequency, severity, or both response scales be used for multi-item dental patient-reported outcome measures?

Authors:  Swaha Pattanaik; Mike T John; Seungwon Chung; San Keller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.

Authors:  Swaha Pattanaik; Mike T John; Seungwon Chung; San Keller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 6.  Including the patient's oral health perspective in evidence-based decision-making.

Authors:  Danna R Paulson; Swaha Pattanaik; Phonsuda Chanthavisouk; Mike T John
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.595

7.  Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt.

Authors:  Lucas A Campos; João Marôco; Mike T John; Ary Santos-Pinto; Juliana A D B Campos
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.

Authors:  Stephanie Bela Andela; Ragna Lamprecht; Mike T John; Swaha Pattanaik; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.