Literature DB >> 29866397

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients.

Bakir O Sumrein1, Ville M Mattila2, Vesa Lepola3, Minna K Laitinen3, Antti P Launonen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal fracture classification should be simple and reproducible and should guide treatment. For proximal humeral fractures, the Neer classification is commonly used. However, intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Neer classification has been shown to be poor. In clinical practice, it is essential to differentiate 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented fractures. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgeons can differentiate 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented fractures using plain radiographs and/or computed tomography (CT).
METHODS: Three experienced upper limb specialists and trauma surgeons (B.O.S., A.P.L., and V.L.) independently reviewed and classified blinded plain radiographs and CT scans of 116 patients as showing 2-part surgical neck fractures or multi-fragmented fractures. Each imaging modality was reviewed and classified separately by each surgeon, after which each surgeon reviewed both modalities at the same time. This process was repeated by all surgeons after 24 weeks. Intraobserver and interobserver analyses were conducted using Cohen and Fleiss κ values, respectively.
RESULTS: The κ coefficient for interobserver reliability showed substantial correlation (0.61-0.73) and was as follows: 0.73 for radiographs alone, 0.61 for CT scans alone, and 0.72 for radiographs and CT scans viewed together. After 24 weeks, the process was repeated and intraobserver reliability was calculated.The κ coefficient for intraobserver reliability showed substantial correlation (0.62-0.75) and was as follows: 0.62 for radiographs alone, 0.64 for CT scans alone, and 0.75 for radiographs and CT scans viewed together.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians were able to differentiate 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented fractures based on plain radiographs reliably.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neer classification; Proximal humeral fracture; interobserver; intraobserver; recategorized; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866397     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging to improve agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adult patient: A systematic review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Hannah Bougher; Archana Nagendiram; Jennifer Banks; Leanne Marie Hall; Clare Heal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-06-26

2.  Incidence and risk factors for pseudosubluxation of the humeral head following proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  Carl M Cirino; David E Kantrowitz; Frank S Cautela; Michael Gao; Paul J Cagle; Bradford O Parsons
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-22

3.  The reliability of the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures: a survey of orthopedic shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Mikaël Chelli; Gregory Gasbarro; Vincent Lavoué; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean-Luc Raynier; Christophe Trojani; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-26

4.  3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Reinier W A Spek; Bram J A Schoolmeesters; Jacobien H F Oosterhoff; Job N Doornberg; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Denise Eygendaal; Frank IJpma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antti P Launonen; Bakir O Sumrein; Aleksi Reito; Vesa Lepola; Juha Paloneva; Kenneth B Jonsson; Olof Wolf; Peter Ström; Hans E Berg; Li Felländer-Tsai; Karl-Åke Jansson; Daniel Fell; Inger Mechlenburg; Kaj Døssing; Helle Østergaard; Aare Märtson; Minna K Laitinen; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of three-dimensionally printed models for the classification of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Hannah Bougher; Petra Buttner; Jonathon Smith; Jennifer Banks; Hyun Su Na; David Forrestal; Clare Heal
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Weichong Dong; Yali Zhou; Meishuang Shang; Sifan Yang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Reproducibility of the modified Neer classification defining displacement with respect to the humeral head fragment for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumura; Ryogo Furuhata; Takayuki Seto; Yuhei Takada; Hideyuki Shirasawa; Satoshi Oki; Yusuke Kawano; Shohei Shiono
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.