Bastian Balcer1, Iryna Dykun1, Thomas Schlosser2, Michael Forsting2, Tienush Rassaf1, Amir A Mahabadi3. 1. The West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 2. The Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. The West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. Electronic address: amir-abbas.mahabadi@uk-essen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to determine the association of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) volume and attenuation with culprit lesions in the underlying coronary segment in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: In patients with myocardial infarction, PCAT volume and attenuation surrounding the following segments were manually traced from non-contrast CT imaging: LM, proximal and mid-segment of LAD, RCA, and LCX. PCAT volume and attenuation surrounding culprit and non-culprit lesions were compared. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated per 1 standard deviation increase in PCAT volume/attenuation. RESULTS: We included 46 subjects (mean age 64.4 ± 16.4 years, 71% male) with acute myocardial infarction. PCAT volume around the right coronary artery was higher compared to left coronary segments, while PCAT attenuation decreased from proximal to distal segments. PCAT volume surrounding culprit lesions was higher compared to segments without culprit lesion (4.90 ± 3.07 ml vs. 2.33 ± 2.63 ml, p < 0.0001), whereas the attenuation was not different (-84.8 ± 9.4 HU vs. -84.2 ± 9.9 HU, p = 0.77). In univariate regression analysis, PCAT volume was significantly associated with the probability of presence of culprit lesions (OR [95% CI]: 3.10 [1.84-5.22], p < 0.0001). Associations remained stable upon adjustment for risk factors (3.34 [1.81-6.15], p < 0.0001). PCAT attenuation was not relevantly different around culprit lesions (unadjusted: 0.94 [0.63-1.40], p = 0.77, risk factor adjusted: 1.00 [0.61-1.64], p = 0.996). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, PCAT volume is strongly and independently associated with culprit lesions in the underlying coronary segments, whereas PCAT attenuation does not relevantly differentiate surrounding coronary segments with and without culprit lesions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to determine the association of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) volume and attenuation with culprit lesions in the underlying coronary segment in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: In patients with myocardial infarction, PCAT volume and attenuation surrounding the following segments were manually traced from non-contrast CT imaging: LM, proximal and mid-segment of LAD, RCA, and LCX. PCAT volume and attenuation surrounding culprit and non-culprit lesions were compared. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated per 1 standard deviation increase in PCAT volume/attenuation. RESULTS: We included 46 subjects (mean age 64.4 ± 16.4 years, 71% male) with acute myocardial infarction. PCAT volume around the right coronary artery was higher compared to left coronary segments, while PCAT attenuation decreased from proximal to distal segments. PCAT volume surrounding culprit lesions was higher compared to segments without culprit lesion (4.90 ± 3.07 ml vs. 2.33 ± 2.63 ml, p < 0.0001), whereas the attenuation was not different (-84.8 ± 9.4 HU vs. -84.2 ± 9.9 HU, p = 0.77). In univariate regression analysis, PCAT volume was significantly associated with the probability of presence of culprit lesions (OR [95% CI]: 3.10 [1.84-5.22], p < 0.0001). Associations remained stable upon adjustment for risk factors (3.34 [1.81-6.15], p < 0.0001). PCAT attenuation was not relevantly different around culprit lesions (unadjusted: 0.94 [0.63-1.40], p = 0.77, risk factor adjusted: 1.00 [0.61-1.64], p = 0.996). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, PCAT volume is strongly and independently associated with culprit lesions in the underlying coronary segments, whereas PCAT attenuation does not relevantly differentiate surrounding coronary segments with and without culprit lesions.
Authors: Markus Goeller; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Alan C Kwan; Sebastien Cadet; Frederic Commandeur; Aryabod Razipour; Piotr J Slomka; Heidi Gransar; Xi Chen; Yuka Otaki; John D Friedman; J Jane Cao; Moritz H Albrecht; Daniel O Bittner; Mohamed Marwan; Stephan Achenbach; Daniel S Berman; Damini Dey Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Min Yang; Wenrui Bao; Zhihan Xu; Le Qin; Ning Zhang; Fuhua Yan; Wenjie Yang Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Caterina B Monti; Marina Codari; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Arthur E Stillman Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Jeremy Yuvaraj; Kevin Cheng; Andrew Lin; Peter J Psaltis; Stephen J Nicholls; Dennis T L Wong Journal: Cells Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.600