Literature DB >> 29866301

Estimation of physical workload of the low-back based on exposure variation analysis during a full working day among male blue-collar workers. Cross-sectional workplace study.

Markus Due Jakobsen1, Emil Sundstrup2, Mikkel Brandt3, Roger Persson4, Lars L Andersen3.   

Abstract

This study aims to quantify physical workload of the low-back using exposure variation analysis (EVA) during a full working day among blue-collar workers with manual lifting tasks. One hundred and ten male employees (39 warehouse workers, 27 operators, 24 postal workers and 20 slaughterhouse workers) with manual lifting tasks from 12 workplaces participated. The workers performed standardized box lifts using 5, 10, 20 and 30 kg before and after a working day. Muscular activity of the low-back was measured throughout the working day using surface electromyography (sEMG). Corresponding sEMG-values for 0-30 kg lifts were identified using linear regression. EVA at exposure levels corresponding to "lifting periods" of [1-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30 and >30] kg in time intervals [0-0.5, 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-5, 5-10, >10] sec was computed. Back inclination was measured using tri-axial accelerometers. Compared to the other job groups, the operators' low-back muscles were exposed to more short duration "lifting periods" with varying loads and more frequent medium duration high load "lifting periods", respectively. The operators also worked more with their back inclined (>30°, >60°, and >90°) than the remaining job groups. Nonetheless, more than 41% of the workers performed heavy "lifting periods" that exceeded Danish lifting guidelines. This EVA demonstrates that almost half of the blue-collar workers were exposed to heavy low-back loading which puts them at risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders and low-back injury. Operators are, in particular, exposed to more short duration and medium duration "lifting periods" with varying load compared to warehouse-, postal- and slaughterhouse workers.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borg; EMG; Low-back pain; Manual handling; Musculoskeletal disorders; Occupational lifting; Physical exertion; Self-report

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866301     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  6 in total

1.  Exploring lumbar and lower limb kinematics and kinetics for evidence that lifting technique is associated with LBP.

Authors:  Nic Saraceni; Amity Campbell; Peter Kent; Leo Ng; Leon Straker; Peter O'Sullivan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Physical workload and bodily fatigue after work: cross-sectional study among 5000 workers.

Authors:  Rúni Bláfoss; Emil Sundstrup; Markus D Jakobsen; Mikkel Brandt; Hans Bay; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Physical and psychosocial work environmental risk factors of low-back pain: protocol for a 1 year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rúni Bláfoss; Per Aagaard; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Trunk Flexion Monitoring among Warehouse Workers Using a Single Inertial Sensor and the Influence of Different Sampling Durations.

Authors:  Micaela Porta; Massimiliano Pau; Pier Francesco Orrù; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Technical field measurements of muscular workload during stocking activities in supermarkets: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sebastian Venge Skovlund; Rúni Bláfoss; Sebastian Skals; Markus Due Jakobsen; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The use of electromyography and kinematic measurements of the lumbar spine during ergonomic intervention among workers of the production line of a foundry.

Authors:  Anna Błaszczyk; Małgorzata B Ogurkowska
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.