Literature DB >> 29865897

Incidence and impact of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in clinical trials of severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

Guillaume Leblanc1,2, Amélie Boutin3, Michèle Shemilt1, François Lauzier1,2,4, Lynne Moore1,3, Véronique Potvin2, Ryan Zarychanski5, Patrick Archambault1,2,6, François Lamontagne7,8, Caroline Léger1, Alexis F Turgeon1,2.   

Abstract

Background Most deaths following severe traumatic brain injury follow decisions to withdraw life-sustaining therapies. However, the incidence of the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies and its potential impact on research data interpretation have been poorly characterized. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the reporting and the impact of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in randomized clinical trials of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, BIOSIS, and CINAHL databases and references of included trials. All randomized controlled trials published between January 2002 and August 2015 in the six highest impact journals in general medicine, critical care medicine, and neurocritical care (total of 18 journals) were considered for eligibility. Randomized controlled trials were included if they enrolled adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) and reported data on mortality. Our primary objective was to assess the proportion of trials reporting the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in a publication. Our secondary objectives were to describe the overall mortality rate, the proportion of deaths following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, and to assess the impact of the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies on trial results. Results From 5987 citations retrieved, we included 41 randomized trials (n = 16,364, ranging from 11 to 10,008 patients). Overall mortality was 23% (range = 3%-57%). Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies was reported in 20% of trials (8/41, 932 patients in trials) and the crude number of deaths due to the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies was reported in 17% of trials (7/41, 884 patients in trials). In these trials, 63% of deaths were associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (105/168). An analysis carried out by imputing a 4% differential rate in instances of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies between study groups yielded different results and conclusions in one third of the trials. Conclusion Data on the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies are incompletely reported in randomized controlled trials of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Given the high proportion of deaths due to the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in severe traumatic brain injury patients, and the potential of this medical decision to influence the results of clinical trials, instances of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies should be systematically reported in clinical trials in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injury; clinical trial; end-of-life; life-sustaining therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29865897     DOI: 10.1177/1740774518771233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neuroprognostication: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Brian L Edlow; Joseph T Giacino; David M Greer; David Fischer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 44.711

2.  Early abolition of cough reflex predicts mortality in deeply sedated brain-injured patients.

Authors:  Stanislas Kandelman; Jérémy Allary; Raphael Porcher; Cássia Righy; Clarissa Francisca Valdez; Frank Rasulo; Nicholas Heming; Guy Moneger; Eric Azabou; Guillaume Savary; Djillali Annane; Fabrice Chretien; Nicola Latronico; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Benjamin Rohaut; Tarek Sharshar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Well-Being After Severe Brain Injury: What Counts as Good Recovery?

Authors:  Mackenzie Graham; Lorina Naci
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.566

4.  Multicenter prospective study on predictors of short-term outcome in disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Anna Estraneo; Salvatore Fiorenza; Alfonso Magliacano; Rita Formisano; Donatella Mattia; Antonello Grippo; Anna Maria Romoli; Efthymios Angelakis; Helena Cassol; Aurore Thibaut; Olivia Gosseries; Gianfranco Lamberti; Enrique Noé; Sergio Bagnato; Brian L Edlow; Camille Chatelle; Nicolas Lejeune; Vigneswaran Veeramuthu; Michelangelo Bartolo; Jlenia Toppi; Nathan Zasler; Caroline Schnakers; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies.

Authors:  Brian L Edlow; Jan Claassen; Nicholas D Schiff; David M Greer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 42.937

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.