Literature DB >> 29865536

Hind limb scaling in birds and other theropods: Implications for terrestrial locomotion.

Stephen M Gatesy1.   

Abstract

An analysis of hind limb skeletal elements of non-avian theropods and ground-dwelling birds was performed to reveal patterns of change in shape and proportion with size. When femora of equal length are compared, birds exhibit a significantly larger midshaft diameter than non-avian theropods. As total limb length increases, avian femora become relatively shorter (negative allometry), while those of non-avian theropods become relatively longer (positive allometry). Avian femoral/tibiotarsal ratios are all below 0.8 and decrease with limb size, whereas ratios of non-avian theropods are well above 0.8 and tend to increase with limb size. In addition, avian femora exhibit a unique diameter/length relationship not seen in other theropod hind limb bones. Several studies have shown that within the avian limb, the short, robust femur resists bending to a far greater degree than the relatively longer, slimmer tibiotarsus. This is to be expected, as analyses of running birds show that the femur is oriented relatively perpendicular to the ground reaction force throughout the stride, which would subject it to high bending moments. When compared to birds, non-avian theropods have relatively long, slender femora that do not seem to be built to withstand the forces associated with such an orientation. Reconstructing all non-avian theropods in avian-like poses (subhorizontal femur, knee well flexed) with avian locomotor kinematics (relatively little hip extension at most speeds) ignores major differences in scaling between these groups of organisms.
Copyright © 1991 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Year:  1991        PMID: 29865536     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052090107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  7 in total

1.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part I-an examination of cancellous bone architecture in the hindlimb bones of theropods.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Belinda R Beck; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion.

Authors:  Bradley C Livezey; Richard L Zusi
Journal:  Zool J Linn Soc       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.286

3.  Phalangeal joints kinematics during ostrich (Struthio camelus) locomotion.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Qiaoli Ji; Gang Luo; Shuliang Xue; Songsong Ma; Jianqiao Li; Lei Ren
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part III-Inferring posture and locomotor biomechanics in extinct theropods, and its evolution on the line to birds.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Maniraptoran pelvic musculature highlights evolutionary patterns in theropod locomotion on the line to birds.

Authors:  Matthew M Rhodes; Donald M Henderson; Philip J Currie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  From fibre to function: are we accurately representing muscle architecture and performance?

Authors:  James Charles; Roger Kissane; Tatjana Hoehfurtner; Karl T Bates
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  Colony-Level Differences in the Scaling Rules Governing Wood Ant Compound Eye Structure.

Authors:  Craig D Perl; Jeremy E Niven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.