| Literature DB >> 29865220 |
Ruoxin Yuan1, Wenbin Kang2, Chuhong Zhang3.
Abstract
In an effort to explore the use of organic high-performance lithium ion battery cathodes as an alternative to resolve the current bottleneck hampering the development of their inorganic counterparts, a rational strategy focusing on the optimal composition of covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTFs) with carbon-based materials of varied dimensionalities is delineated. Two-dimensional reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with a compatible structural conformation with the layered CTF is the most suitable scaffold for the tailored mesopores in the polymeric framework, providing outstanding energy storage ability. Through facile ionothermal synthesis and structure engineering, the obtained CTF-rGO composite possesses a high specific surface area of 1357.27 m²/g, and when used as a lithium ion battery cathode it delivers a large capacity of 235 mAh/g in 80 cycles at 0.1 A/g along with a stable capacity of 127 mAh/g over 2500 cycles at 5 A/g. The composite with modified pore structure shows drastically improved performance compared to a pristine CTF, especially at large discharge currents. The CTF-rGO composite with excellent capacity, stability, and rate performance shows great promise as an emerging high-performance cathode that could revolutionize the conventional lithium-ion battery industry.Entities:
Keywords: carbon materials; covalent triazine-based frameworks; graphene; lithium-ion batteries
Year: 2018 PMID: 29865220 PMCID: PMC6025425 DOI: 10.3390/ma11060937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) FT-IR spectra and (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the synthesized covalent triazine-based framework (CTF) and the CTF-rGO composite; (c) nitrogen sorption isotherms (solid and hollow squares correspond to the adsorption and desorption process respectively); and (d) cumulative pore volume plot vs. pore width of CTF and its composites. rGO: reduced graphene oxide.
Summary and analysis of nitrogen sorption data for all synthesized CTF composites. BET: Brunauer–Emmett–Teller.
| Calculation Model | BET | V-t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Area (m2/g) | Micropore Area (m2/g) | Micropore Percentage | |
| CTF | 868.058 | 628.490 | 72.4% |
| CTF-CS-400 | 1009.801 | 441.733 | 43.7% |
| CTF-CNT-400 | 911.556 | 437.201 | 47.9% |
| CTF-rGO-400 | 1018.616 | 330.443 | 32.4% |
| CTF-GA-400 | 865.614 | 455.793 | 52.7% |
| CTF-rGO-400-600 | 1357.270 | 200.444 | 14.8% |
Figure 2(a) TEM images of the CTF-rGO composite and rGO in the inset. (b,c) SEM images of the CTF-rGO composite and the CTF-GA composite, respectively. (d) The discharge capacities of CTF and all the carbon-based composites measured over 80 cycles at 0.1 A/g.
Figure 3(a) Nitrogen sorption isotherms (solid and hollow squares correspond to the adsorption and desorption process respectively) and (b) the plot of cumulative pore volume vs. pore width of the CTF, CTF-rGO-400, and CTF-rGO-400-600.
Figure 4Electrochemical property tests of the CTF, CTF-rGO-400, and CTF-rGO-400-600. (a) CV measurement of CTF-rGO-400-600 scanned at 0.1 mV/s; (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of CTF-rGO-400-600 at various cycles measured at 0.1 A/g; (c) cycling stability test of CTF-rGO-400-600 at 0.1 A/g and at 5 A/g up to 2500 cycles; (d) rate performance comparison between the three samples at various current densities.