Literature DB >> 29865087

Relationships between Lower Limb Muscle Strength Impairments and Physical Limitations in DM1.

Émilie Petitclerc1,2, Luc J Hébert3, Jean Mathieu1,2, Johanne Desrosiers1, Cynthia Gagnon1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although adult and late-onset DM1 phenotypes DM1 present distinct lower limb weaknesses portraits, resulting physical limitations have never been described separately for each phenotype.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the lower limb weaknesses and physical limitations among the DM1 adult and late-onset phenotypes separately and to document the contribution of weaknesses on mobility to optimize the management of this population.
METHODS: The strength of four muscle groups among 198 participants was quantified. Participants were categorized according to the severity of their muscular involvement using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). Physical limitations were assessed using the Timed up-and-go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and 10 meters comfortable walking speed (10MWT). Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify the contribution of each muscle group to the mobility tests scores.
RESULTS: Late-onset demonstrated less weakness and physical limitations (p < 0.001 - 0.002) than the adult phenotype, but 21.9-47.5% of participants with this phenotype showed mobility scores below reference values. Physical limitations were observed in the first two MIRS grades (37.5-42.1% of the participants) for the TUG and 10MWT. Ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors were the two muscle groups that showed the strongest relationships with mobility scores.
CONCLUSION: Although less impaired, the late-onset phenotype shows significant lower limb muscle weakness associated with physical limitations. The surprising presence of quantitative lower limb muscle weakness in the first two MIRS grades needs to be considered when using this scale. Both ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors appear to be good indicators of physical limitations in DM1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myotonic dystrophy; mobility limitation; muscle strength; phenotype

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29865087     DOI: 10.3233/JND-170291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis


  4 in total

1.  A 9-year follow-up study of quantitative muscle strength changes in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Authors:  Cynthia Gagnon; Émilie Petitclerc; Marie Kierkegaard; Jean Mathieu; Élise Duchesne; Luc J Hébert
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Assessment of muscular strength and functional capacity in the juvenile and adult myotonic dystrophy type 1 population: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Marie-Pier Roussel; Marie-Michèle Fiset; Laurie Gauthier; Claudia Lavoie; Émilie McNicoll; Laurie Pouliot; Cynthia Gagnon; Elise Duchesne
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Predictors of prognosis in type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1): longitudinal 18-years experience from a single center.

Authors:  Marco Mazzoli; Alessandra Ariatti; Gian Carlo Garuti; Virginia Agnoletto; Maurilio Genovese; Manuela Gozzi; Shaniko Kaleci; Alessandro Marchioni; Marcella Malagoli; Giuliana Galassi
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Predictors of respiratory decline in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1): a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Marco Mazzoli; Alessandra Ariatti; Giancarlo Garuti; Virginia Agnoletto; Riccardo Fantini; Alessandro Marchioni; Giuliana Galassi
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.396

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.