Rosalind Case1, Susie Cartledge2, Josine Siedenburg3, Karen Smith4, Lahn Straney5, Bill Barger6, Judith Finn7, Janet E Bray8. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia; ISN Psychology, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: rosalind.case@florey.edu.au. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Australia; Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Australia. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Telstra Health, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Australia. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. 8. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Understanding regional variation in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important to improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. In this study we aimed to identify barriers to providing bystander CPR in regions with low rates of bystander CPR and where OHCA was recognised in the emergency call. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed emergency calls for adults in regions of low bystander CPR in the Australian state of Victoria. Included calls were those where OHCA was identified during the call but no bystander CPR was given. A thematic content analysis was independently conducted by two investigators. RESULTS: Saturation of themes was reached after listening to 139 calls. Calls progressed to the point of compression instructions before EMS arrival in only 26 (18.7%) of cases. Three types of barriers were identified: procedural barriers (time lost due to language barriers and communication issues; telephone problems), CPR knowledge (skill deficits; perceived benefit) and personal factors (physical frailty or disability; patient position; emotional factors). CONCLUSION: A range of factors are associated with barriers to delivering bystander CPR even in the presence of dispatcher instructions - some of which are modifiable. To overcome these barriers in high-risk regions, targeted public education needs to provide information about what occurs in an emergency call, how to recognise an OHCA and to improve CPR knowledge and skills.
INTRODUCTION: Understanding regional variation in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important to improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. In this study we aimed to identify barriers to providing bystander CPR in regions with low rates of bystander CPR and where OHCA was recognised in the emergency call. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed emergency calls for adults in regions of low bystander CPR in the Australian state of Victoria. Included calls were those where OHCA was identified during the call but no bystander CPR was given. A thematic content analysis was independently conducted by two investigators. RESULTS: Saturation of themes was reached after listening to 139 calls. Calls progressed to the point of compression instructions before EMS arrival in only 26 (18.7%) of cases. Three types of barriers were identified: procedural barriers (time lost due to language barriers and communication issues; telephone problems), CPR knowledge (skill deficits; perceived benefit) and personal factors (physical frailty or disability; patient position; emotional factors). CONCLUSION: A range of factors are associated with barriers to delivering bystander CPR even in the presence of dispatcher instructions - some of which are modifiable. To overcome these barriers in high-risk regions, targeted public education needs to provide information about what occurs in an emergency call, how to recognise an OHCA and to improve CPR knowledge and skills.
Authors: Anne Juul Grabmayr; Linn Andelius; Nanna Bo Christensen; Fredrik Folke; Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar Gislason; Theo Walther Jensen; Astrid Rolin Kragh; Mads Christian Tofte Gregers; Julie Samsoee Kjoelbye; Carolina Malta Hansen Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Sonali Munot; Julie Redfern; Janet E Bray; Blake Angell; Adrian Bauman; Andrew Coggins; Alan Robert Denniss; Cate Ferry; Garry Jennings; Pramesh Kovoor; Saurabh Kumar; Kevin Lai; Sarah Khanlari; Simone Marschner; Paul M Middleton; Michael Nelson; Ian Opperman; Christopher Semsarian; Lee Taylor; Matthew Vukasovic; Sandra Ware; Clara Chow Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Robert Greif; Andrew Lockey; Jan Breckwoldt; Francesc Carmona; Patricia Conaghan; Artem Kuzovlev; Lucas Pflanzl-Knizacek; Ferenc Sari; Salma Shammet; Andrea Scapigliati; Nigel Turner; Joyce Yeung; Koenraad G Monsieurs Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 0.826
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Ian Maconochie; Jasmeet Soar; Theresa M Olasveengen; Robert Greif; Myra H Wyckoff; Eunice M Singletary; Richard Aickin; Katherine M Berg; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; Jonathan Wyllie; David Zideman; Robert W Neumar; Gavin D Perkins; Maaret Castrén; Peter T Morley; William H Montgomery; Vinay M Nadkarni; John E Billi; Raina M Merchant; Allan de Caen; Raffo Escalante-Kanashiro; David Kloeck; Tzong-Luen Wang; Mary Fran Hazinski Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 6.251