| Literature DB >> 29862364 |
Fabiola Castorena-Torres1, Mario René Alcorta-García1,2, Víctor Javier Lara-Díaz1.
Abstract
Both transient tachypnea of the newborn and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome have been associated with changes in gene expression of aquaporine-5 (AQP5) and the β subunit of the epithelial sodium channel (β-ENaC) in the respiratory epithelium. Gastric aspirate (GA) obtained immediately after birth could represent a new source for gene expression analysis for these respiratory diseases. The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility of estimating AQP5 and β-ENaC gene expression in exfoliated respiratory epithelial cells from the GA of term neonates, and to compare the values with those found in scraped nasal epithelial cells, previously validated as a surrogate for distal lung epithelium in terms of ionic channel activity. The study had a cross-sectional, proof-of-concept design. Immediately after birth, we obtained GA and nasal mucous membrane scrapings from term newborns, in which total RNA and RT-qPCR assays for AQP5 and β-ENaC genes were performed. AQP5 gene expression was greater in GA than in nasal scrapings, and β-ENaC gene expression was at least as great in GA as that obtained in nasal scrapings. Amplification of samples from the two sites was comparable. AQP5 gene expression was greater in babies delivered by cesarean section; β-ENaC gene expression was greater in babies delivered vaginally, but only in the nasal samples. Quantitation of the expression of AQP5 and of β-ENaC genes in GA, obtained shortly after birth from term newborns is feasible. If confirmed in preterm neonates, this approach could aid in the differential diagnosis of neonatal respiratory diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Medicine; Pediatrics; Physiology
Year: 2018 PMID: 29862364 PMCID: PMC5968175 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Study flow chart.
Demographics and clinical characteristics of term neonates included in the study n = 63.
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Malea | 23 (37) |
| Femalea | 40 (63) |
| Method of delivery | |
| Vaginala | 25 (40) |
| Abdominala | 38 (60) |
| Gestational age, weeks.b | 39 (1.1) |
| Maternal age, years.b | 24.5 (6.1) |
| Birth weight, gb | 3256 (430) |
| Birth length, cmb | 50 (1.5) |
| Birth head circumference, cmb | 34.5 (1.6) |
| Apgar scorec | |
| 1 minute | 8 (7–9) |
| 5 minutes | 9 (9–10) |
Annotations: a Values expressed as frequency and (percentage). b Values expressed as mean and (standard deviation). c Median (minimum – maximum).
Relative gene expression and yield in samples from nasal mucosa scrapping and gastric aspirate in term neonates, n = 59.
| Gene of interest | Sample site | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal | Gastric | ||||
| mean (SD) | Yield | mean (SD) | Yield | ||
| AQP5 | 0.81 (1.0) | 81 | 1.95 (2.3) | 91 | 0.001a |
| NSb | |||||
| β-ENaC | 0.9 (1.0) | 81 | 0.7 (0.9) | 90 | NSa |
| NSb | |||||
Annotations: AQP5 = Aquaporin 5; β-ENaC = Sodium epithelial channel 1, beta fraction. Values are expressed as 2−ΔΔCt mean and (standard deviation) Yield = percentage of samples that yielded amplification. a Analysis done with Student's t test test, comparison was done on the values for gene expression; b Analysis done by Fisher's exact test, comparison was done on the values for sample yield; NS = Non-significant.
Relative gene expression and yield in samples from nasal mucosa scrapping and gastric aspirate, separated by method of delivery, in term neonates, n = 59.
| Gene of interest/Sample site | Method of delivery | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaginal | Abdominal | ||||
| mean (SD) | Yield | mean (SD) | Yield | ||
| AQP5 | |||||
| Nasal | 0.3 (0.3) | 88 | 1.2 (1.1) | 77 | 0.001a |
| NSb | |||||
| Gastric | 1.1 (1.4) | 96 | 2.5 (2.7) | 88 | 0.02a |
| NSb | |||||
| β-ENaC | |||||
| Nasal | 1.3 (1.1) | 88 | 0.6 (0.6) | 77 | 0.03a |
| NSb | |||||
| Gastric | 0.5 (0.5) | 96 | 0.8 (1.0) | 86 | NSa |
| NSb | |||||
Annotations: AQP5 = Aquaporin 5; β-ENaC = Sodium epithelial channel 1, beta fraction. Values are expressed as 2−ΔΔCt mean and (standard deviation) Yield = percentage of samples that yielded amplification; a Analysis done with Student's t test, comparison was done on the values for gene expression; b Analysis done by Fisher's exact test, comparison was done on the values for sample yield; NS = Non-significant.