Literature DB >> 29862314

Applying the Precaution Adoption Process Model to the Acceptance of Mine Safety and Health Technologies.

Emily J Haas1.   

Abstract

Mineworkers are continually introduced to protective technologies on the job. Yet, their perceptions toward the technologies are often not addressed until they are actively trying to use them, which may halt safe technology adoption and associated work practices. This study explored management and worker perspectives toward three technologies to forecast adoption and behavioral intention on the job. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 21 mineworkers and 19 mine managers to determine the adoption process stage algorithm for workers and managers, including perceived barriers to using new safety and health technologies. Differences between workers and managers were revealed in terms of readiness, perceptions, and initial trust in using technologies. Workers, whether they had or had not used a particular technology, still had negative perceptions toward its use in the initial introduction and integration at their mine site, indicating a lengthy time period needed for full adoption. The key finding from these results is that a carefully considered and extended introduction of technology for workers in Stage 3 (undecided to act) is most important to promote progression to Stage 5 (decided to act) and to avoid Stage 4 (decided not to act). In response, organizational management may need to account for workers' particular stage algorithm, using the Precaution Adoption Process Model, to understand how to tailor messages about protective technologies, administer skill-based trainings and interventions that raise awareness and knowledge, and ultimately encourage safe adoption of associated work practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mine health and safety; Precaution adoption process model; Protective technology; Qualitative methods; Risk communication; Risk perception

Year:  2018        PMID: 29862314      PMCID: PMC5978749     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Health Sci        ISSN: 2367-0142


  24 in total

Review 1.  Optimistic biases about personal risks.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The impact of a national mass media campaign in The Netherlands on the prevention of weight gain.

Authors:  Birgitte Wammes; Boudewijn Breedveld; Caspar Looman; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Taking Stock of Unrealistic Optimism.

Authors:  James A Shepperd; William M P Klein; Erika A Waters; Neil D Weinstein
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07

4.  A Qualitative Comparison of Susceptibility and Behavior in Recreational and Occupational Risk Environments: Implications for Promoting Health and Safety.

Authors:  Emily Joy Haas; Marifran Mattson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-05-17

5.  Performance objectives for the self-management of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  L K Bartholomew; M M Sockrider; D K Seilheimer; D I Czyzewski; G S Parcel; S H Spinelli
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1993-11

6.  Quick fixes to improve workers' health: Results using engineering assessment technology.

Authors:  E J Haas; A B Cecala
Journal:  Min Eng       Date:  2017-07

7.  Osteoporosis prevention in premenopausal women: using a stage model approach to examine the predictors of behavior.

Authors:  S J Blalock; R F DeVellis; K B Giorgino; B M DeVellis; D T Gold; M A Dooley; J J Anderson; S L Smith
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Using Dust Assessment Technology to Leverage Mine Site Manager-Worker Communication and Health Behavior: A Longitudinal Case Study.

Authors:  Emily J Haas; Andrew B Cecala; Cassandra L Hoebbel
Journal:  J Progress Res Soc Sci       Date:  2016-01-06

9.  Working Conditions, Workplace Violence, and Psychological Distress in Andean Miners: A Cross-sectional Study Across Three Countries.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Salas; Steve Quezada; Armando Basagoitia; Tamara Fernandez; Ronald Herrera; Manuel Parra; Daniel Moraga Muñoz; Matthias Weigl; Katja Radon
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.462

10.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and uptake in college students: Implications from the Precaution Adoption Process Model.

Authors:  Marie Barnard; Phillis George; Mandy L Perryman; Lori A Wolff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Jason Beckstead; Meagan Farmer; Gillian Hooker; Marleah Dean; Ellen Matloff; Sonya Reid; Ann Tezak; Anne Weidner; Jennifer G Whisenant; Tuya Pal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Using self-determination theory to identify organizational interventions to support coal mineworkers' dust-reducing practices.

Authors:  Emily J Haas
Journal:  Int J Min Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.