| Literature DB >> 29861872 |
Shui-Qing Wu1,2, Ran Xu1, Xue-Feng Li2, Xiao-Kun Zhao1, Bin-Zhi Qian2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) have multifaceted roles in the development of many tumor types. However, the prognostic value of TAMs in bladder cancer is still not conclusive. EXPERIMENTALEntities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; meta-analysis; system review; tumor associated macrophages
Year: 2018 PMID: 29861872 PMCID: PMC5982745 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Flow diagram for the selection of included studies
The characteristics of included studies
| Study, Year | Country | Cases number | Tumor stages | Therapy | Biomarkers | Antibody Source | Sample locations | Follow up | Outcome | NOS score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanada T, 2000 | Japan | 63 | Ta, T1-4 | TUR, RC | CD68 | Anti-CD68, mAb, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark | W | 65 (3–153) | OS | 7 |
| Koga F, 2004 | Japan | 69 | T1, T2-4 | RC | CD68 | Anti-CD68, mAb, KP1, Dako, Carpenteria, California, dilution 1:200 | I*, M | 58 (2–196) | DSS | 7 |
| Takayama H, 2009 | Japan | 44 | Tis | BCG | CD68 | Anti-CD68, mAb, DACO JAPAN, Kyoto, Japan | I, S, W | 55.2 (3–240.5) | RFS | 9 |
| Ayari C, 2009 | Canada | 46 | Ta, T1, Tis | TUR+BCG | CD68 | Anti-CD68, CloneKP1, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark | W | 26 | RFS | 8 |
| Ajili F, 2013 | Tunisia | 27 | Ta, T1 | TUR+BCG | CD68 | Anti-CD68, CloneNCL-L-CD68, Leica, dilution 1:40 | W | 26 | RFS | 5 |
| Suriano F, 2013 | Italy | 40 | NMIBC | TUR+BCG | CD68, CD163 | Anti-CD68, mAb, PG-M1; Anti-CD163, mAb; dilution 1:200 | W | NR | RFS | 6 |
| Ayari C, 2013 | Canada | 93 | Ta, T1 | TUR | CD68 | Anti-CD68, cloneKP1 from DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark, dilution 1:400 | W | 68.4 | RFS | 8 |
| Sjödahl G, 2014 | Sweden | 52 | MIBC | RC | CD68 | Anti-CD68, cloneEBM11 from Dako, dilution1:1500 | W | 70 | DSS, PFS | 8 |
| Lima L, 2014 | Portugal | 99 | Ta, T1 | TUR+BCG | CD163 | Anti-CD163, mAb, Clone10D6; Novocastra-Leica, dilution 1:100 | S | 97 (13–163) | RFS | 8 |
| Wang B, 2015 | China | 302 | Ta, T1-4 | TUR, RC | CD68 | Anti-CD68, DakoA/S, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark, dilution1:500 | I, S | 82 (4–137) | OS, RFS | 8 |
| Shao J, 2015 | China | 337 | T1 | TUR+THP | CD163 | Anti-163, 10D6, Maixin, Fuzhou, China | I, S | 32.4 (2.4–111.6) | RFS | 7 |
| Boström MM, 2015 | Finland | 184 | Ta, Tis, T1-4 | TUR, RC | CD68 | Anti-68, mAb, ab845, Abcam, U.K, dilution 1:5 | W | 6.9 (TUR); 4.2 (RC) | OS, RFS, DSS, PFS | 9 |
| Pichler R, 2016 | Austria | 40 | Ta, T1, Tis | TUR+BCG | CD68, CD163 | Anti-163, mAb, CloneMRQ-26, prediluted, Roche; Anti-68, mAb, ClonePG-M1, Dako, dilution 1:50 | W | 29.5 | RFS | 8 |
Abbreviations: TUR: transurethral resection; RC: radical cystectomy; BCG: Bacillus Calmette Guerin vaccine; THP: Therarubicin; S: Stroma; I: Intratumoral or Islet; I*: invasive front; M: middle to superficial carcinoma parts; W: whole sample area (or not specified); OS: overall survival; RFS: relapse free survival; CSS: cancer specific survival.
Figure 2Forest plots evaluating the prognostic role of CD68+ TAMs in bladder cancer patients
(A) CD68+ TAMs with OS; (B) CD68+ TAMs with DSS; (C) CD68+ TAMs with PFS.
Figure 3Forest plot evaluating the prognostic role of CD68+ TAMs on RFS in bladder cancer patients
Subgroup analyses with regard to different sample locations.
The evaluation of elevated CD68+ macrophages with clinicopathological characteristics
| Patient charateristics | References of studies | Number of patients | Effect | OR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I2 (%) | Ph | |||||
| Sex | 11, 14, 17 | 202 | fixed | 0.47 (–0.10–1.039) | 0 | 0.91 |
| Age | 14, 17 | 139 | fixed | 0.76 (–0.07–1.59) | 1 | 0.315 |
| carcinoma | 14, 15 | 73 | fixed | 1.74 (–3.31–6.79) | 0 | 0.50 |
| Tumor stage | 14, 15, 17 | 166 | fixed | 2.77 (–0.72–6.26) | 0 | 0.885 |
| Number of tumor | 14, 15, 17 | 166 | fixed | 1.24 (0.11–2.37) | 0 | 0.90 |
| Tumor grade | 11, 14, 17 | 202 | fixed | 1.90 (–0.38–4.18) | 0 | 0.91 |
| Tumor size | 14, 15 | 73 | fixed | 1.17 (–0.51–2.86) | 0 | 0.39 |
Figure 4Forest plot of pooled HR for CD163+ TAMs on RFS in bladder cancer patients
Subgroup analyses with regard to the history of BCG therapy.
Figure 5Begg's funnel plot evaluating the potential publication bias among the included studies
(A). CD68 expression with RFS (P = 0.119); (B). CD68 expression with DSS (P = 1.0); (C). CD68 expression with OS (P = 0.734); (D). CD163 expression with RFS (P = 0.221).