BACKGROUND: To examine postoperative complications for osteosynthesizing femoral neck fractures (Pauwels III), biomechanical analysis should be conducted under dynamic conditions simulating for walking, not static conditions. Among the two main aims of this study, one is to pioneer the technique of dynamic finite element (FE) analysis, and the other is to compare stress distribution between two implants during walking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, we performed an inverse dynamic analysis with optimization method using a musculoskeletal model to calculate the inter-segmental and muscular forces during walking. Second, three FE models were prepared: (I) intact hip joint, (II) fractures treated with two Hansson pins (HP), and (III) fractures with Dual SC Screws (DSCS) maintaining an angular stability. The direction and magnitude of the loadings varied continuously. Stress distribution during the walking was evaluated by using a dynamic explicit method. We examined the time-dependent von Mises stresses at two representative spots: medial cortex at the femoral neck fracture site and lateral pin (presumed) insertion holes. RESULTS: In general, stress values are always changing during walking cycle. Regarding medial femoral neck cortex at the fracture line, intact model showed almost consistent value. Both HP model and DSCS model amounted the highest around 30 MPa. At lateral holes, highest values were 18.8, 104.0, and 63.1 MPa of intact, HP, and DSCS models, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thus, our analysis simulating the real walking will be useful in evaluating time-varying stress distribution to assess postoperative complication. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: DSCS is expected to be paramount for treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.
BACKGROUND: To examine postoperative complications for osteosynthesizing femoral neck fractures (Pauwels III), biomechanical analysis should be conducted under dynamic conditions simulating for walking, not static conditions. Among the two main aims of this study, one is to pioneer the technique of dynamic finite element (FE) analysis, and the other is to compare stress distribution between two implants during walking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, we performed an inverse dynamic analysis with optimization method using a musculoskeletal model to calculate the inter-segmental and muscular forces during walking. Second, three FE models were prepared: (I) intact hip joint, (II) fractures treated with two Hansson pins (HP), and (III) fractures with Dual SC Screws (DSCS) maintaining an angular stability. The direction and magnitude of the loadings varied continuously. Stress distribution during the walking was evaluated by using a dynamic explicit method. We examined the time-dependent von Mises stresses at two representative spots: medial cortex at the femoral neck fracture site and lateral pin (presumed) insertion holes. RESULTS: In general, stress values are always changing during walking cycle. Regarding medial femoral neck cortex at the fracture line, intact model showed almost consistent value. Both HP model and DSCS model amounted the highest around 30 MPa. At lateral holes, highest values were 18.8, 104.0, and 63.1 MPa of intact, HP, and DSCS models, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thus, our analysis simulating the real walking will be useful in evaluating time-varying stress distribution to assess postoperative complication. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: DSCS is expected to be paramount for treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.
Entities:
Keywords:
dynamic; femoral neck fracture; finite element analysis; walking