Literature DB >> 29860642

Recent Progress in Genome Editing Approaches for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases.

Balpreet Kaur1, Isaac Perea-Gil1,2, Ioannis Karakikes3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the recent progress in nuclease-based therapeutic applications for inherited heart diseases in vitro, highlights the development of the most recent genome editing technologies and discusses the associated challenges for clinical translation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Inherited cardiovascular disorders are passed from generation to generation. Over the past decade, considerable progress has been made in understanding the genetic basis of inherited heart diseases. The timely emergence of genome editing technologies using engineered programmable nucleases has revolutionized the basic research of inherited cardiovascular diseases and holds great promise for the development of targeted therapies. The genome editing toolbox is rapidly expanding, and new tools have been recently added that significantly expand the capabilities of engineered nucleases. Newer classes of versatile engineered nucleases, such as the "base editors," have been recently developed, offering the potential for efficient and precise therapeutic manipulation of the human genome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Base editing; CRISPR/Cas9; Cardiovascular diseases; Genome editing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29860642     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-018-0998-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  28 in total

Review 1.  Adeno-associated virus vectors as therapeutic and investigational tools in the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Serena Zacchigna; Lorena Zentilin; Mauro Giacca
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining.

Authors:  Kishore K Chiruvella; Zhuobin Liang; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Christopher E Nelson; Chady H Hakim; David G Ousterout; Pratiksha I Thakore; Eirik A Moreb; Ruth M Castellanos Rivera; Sarina Madhavan; Xiufang Pan; F Ann Ran; Winston X Yan; Aravind Asokan; Feng Zhang; Dongsheng Duan; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Patient-Specific and Genome-Edited Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Elucidate Single-Cell Phenotype of Brugada Syndrome.

Authors:  Ping Liang; Karim Sallam; Haodi Wu; Yingxin Li; Ilanit Itzhaki; Priyanka Garg; Ying Zhang; Vittavat Vermglinchan; Feng Lan; Mingxia Gu; Tingyu Gong; Yan Zhuge; Chunjiang He; Antje D Ebert; Veronica Sanchez-Freire; Jared Churko; Shijun Hu; Arun Sharma; Chi Keung Lam; Melvin M Scheinman; Donald M Bers; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  David Benjamin Turitz Cox; Randall Jeffrey Platt; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  A Comprehensive TALEN-Based Knockout Library for Generating Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Models for Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Ioannis Karakikes; Vittavat Termglinchan; Diana A Cepeda; Jaecheol Lee; Sebastian Diecke; Ayal Hendel; Ilanit Itzhaki; Mohamed Ameen; Rajani Shrestha; Haodi Wu; Ning Ma; Ning-Yi Shao; Timon Seeger; Nicole Woo; Kitchener D Wilson; Elena Matsa; Matthew H Porteus; Vittorio Sebastiano; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Takeshi Maruyama; Stephanie K Dougan; Matthias C Truttmann; Angelina M Bilate; Jessica R Ingram; Hidde L Ploegh
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy.

Authors:  Janice S Chen; Yavuz S Dagdas; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Moira M Welch; Alexander A Sousa; Lucas B Harrington; Samuel H Sternberg; J Keith Joung; Ahmet Yildiz; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  In vivo genome editing in animals using AAV-CRISPR system: applications to translational research of human disease.

Authors:  Cia-Hin Lau; Yousin Suh
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-20

10.  Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity.

Authors:  Johnny H Hu; Shannon M Miller; Maarten H Geurts; Weixin Tang; Liwei Chen; Ning Sun; Christina M Zeina; Xue Gao; Holly A Rees; Zhi Lin; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  hPSC gene editing for cardiac disease therapy.

Authors:  Amina Saleem; Muhammad Khawar Abbas; Yongming Wang; Feng Lan
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  AlleleProfileR: A versatile tool to identify and profile sequence variants in edited genomes.

Authors:  Arne A N Bruyneel; Alexandre R Colas; Ioannis Karakikes; Mark Mercola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Genome Editing for the Understanding and Treatment of Inherited Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Quynh Nguyen; Kenji Rowel Q Lim; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.