Literature DB >> 29860269

Continuity of care and referral rate: challenges for the future of health care.

Marijke Olthof1, Feikje Groenhof1, Marjolein Y Berger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care could reduce health care consumption by patients and reduce the number of referrals to specialist care, but it is unknown if there is a difference in referral rates to specific medical specialties. AIM: We aimed to determine the relationship between continuity of care and both the referral rate (referrals per patient per year) and the medical specialties for which this relationship was strongest. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A retrospective cohort study of 19333 patients in primary care in the north of the Netherlands.
METHOD: Patients with at least two contacts with a general practitioner (GP) over a 2-year period (2013-2014) were included. The number of contacts with their own or other GPs were calculated, and referral rates were determined. Continuity of care was included as a dichotomous variable (absent or present).
RESULTS: The odds of being referred were higher for older patients, females and patients with more practitioner contacts. However, the presence of continuity of care was associated with the highest odds of referral. The referral rate was significantly highest for patients with continuity of care when referred to paediatrics, as well as for patients without continuity of care who were referred to gastroenterology, ophthalmology and psychiatry.
CONCLUSION: Increased continuity of care decreases referral to specialist care, most notably for referrals to paediatrics. Despite continued pressures on continuity of care, policy makers should invest in this cornerstone of primary care to temper health care expenditures.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuity of care; consultation; doctor–patient relationship; practice management; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29860269     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmy048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of clinical efficacy of continuous care with improved insulin injection techniques on patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fang-Ying Zhang; Mengyuan Shen; Li-Qin Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.573

2.  Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience.

Authors:  Andrew Bonney; Grant Russell; Jan Radford; Nicholas Zwar; Judy Mullan; Marijka Batterham; Danielle Mazza; Gregory Peterson; Simon Eckermann; Christine Metusela
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Continuity of care experienced by patients in a multi-institutional pancreatic care network: a pilot study.

Authors:  J S Hopstaken; D van Dalen; B M van der Kolk; E J M van Geenen; J J Hermans; E C Gootjes; H J Schers; A M van Dulmen; C J H M van Laarhoven; M W J Stommel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Analysis on Value of Continuous Nursing Based on WeChat in Improving Healthy Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy.

Authors:  Liu Li; Haiyan Chen; Can Peng; Li Yang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.

Authors:  Hogne Sandvik; Øystein Hetlevik; Jesper Blinkenberg; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.302

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.