Literature DB >> 29859789

Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation in Women Less Than 50 Years Old Treated on 4 Prospective Protocols.

Fauzia Shaikh1, Jessica Chew1, Tsivia Hochman2, Juhi Purswani1, Olivier Maisonet1, Elecia Peat1, Nelly Huppert1, Benjamin T Cooper1, Moses Tam1, Judith D Goldberg2, Carmen A Perez1, Silvia C Formenti1, Naamit K Gerber3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy (RT) has proved to be equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT in multiple randomized trials. There is controversy regarding its use in younger women because of their underrepresentation in trials and the concern for late toxicity. We evaluated disease control and cosmetic outcomes in patients aged <50 years treated with hypofractionated RT in 4 prospective single-institutional trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2003 to 2015, 1313 patients were enrolled in 4 prospective protocols investigating the use of adjuvant hypofractionated RT after breast-conserving surgery with a daily or weekly concomitant boost. We identified the records of 348 patients aged <50 years at consultation for this analysis. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method by study and across studies using meta-analytic methods. The late effects of RT, clinician-rated cosmesis, and patient-rated cosmesis were also evaluated.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 66.9 months, the overall survival rate was 99.6%, the disease-free survival rate was 96.3%, and the local recurrence-free survival rate was 97.7% at 3 years. Clinician-rated cosmesis (n = 242) was excellent or good in 93.4% of cases and fair or poor in 6.6%. Patient-rated cosmesis (n = 259) was excellent or good in 86.1% and fair or poor in 13.9%. When patients rated themselves differently than their physicians, patients more often rated themselves poorly compared with their physicians (P = .0044, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test).
CONCLUSIONS: At a median follow-up of 5 years, an analysis of patients aged <50 years demonstrated that hypofractionated RT was safe and effective, with good to excellent cosmesis as assessed by both clinicians and patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29859789     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  Expert Discussion: Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy - Standard for All Indications?

Authors:  Gerd Fastner; David Krug; Icro Meattini; Günther Gruber; Philip Poortmans
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.268

2.  Evidence-based guidelines for hypofractionated radiation in breast cancer: conclusions of the Catalan expert working group.

Authors:  Arantxa Eraso; Javier Sanz; Meritxell Mollà; Vicky Reyes; Agustí Pedro; Meritxell Arenas; Evelyn Martinez; Rosa Ballester; Maria José Cambra; Virginia García; Joan Lluis Prades; Josep M Borras; Manuel Algara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.340

3.  Skin recurrence in the radiation treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Leah M Katz; Carmen A Perez; Naamit K Gerber; Juhi Purswani; Allison McCarthy; Indra J Das
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 4.  Breast Radiation Therapy Under COVID-19 Pandemic Resource Constraints-Approaches to Defer or Shorten Treatment From a Comprehensive Cancer Center in the United States.

Authors:  Lior Z Braunstein; Erin F Gillespie; Linda Hong; Amy Xu; Samuel F Bakhoum; John Cuaron; Boris Mueller; Beryl McCormick; Oren Cahlon; Simon Powell; Atif J Khan
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.