Literature DB >> 29859728

Blue light cystoscopy for the diagnosis of bladder cancer: Results from the US prospective multicenter registry.

Siamak Daneshmand1, Soroush T Bazargani2, Trinity J Bivalacqua3, Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein4, Brian Willard5, Jennifer M Taylor6, Joseph C Liao7, Kamal Pohar8, James Tierney9, Badrinath Konety10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Blue light cystoscopy (BLC) using hexaminolevulinate (HAL/Cysview/Hexvix) has been previously shown to improve detection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Herein, we evaluated the detection of malignant lesions in a heterogenous group of patients in the real world setting and documented the change in risk category due to upstaging or upgrading.
METHODS: Prospective enrollment during April 2014 to December 2016 of consecutive adult patients with suspected or known non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer based on prior cystoscopy or imaging, undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor at 9 different referral medical centers. HAL was instilled in the bladder for 1 to 3 hours before evacuation and inspection. Sensitivity and specificity of BLC, white light cystoscopy (WLC), and the combination of both BLC and WLC for detection of any malignancy was reported on final pathology. Number of patients with a change in American Urological Association (AUA) risk category based on BLC findings leading to a possible change in management and adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,632 separate samples from bladder resection or biopsy were identified from 641 BLC procedures on 533 patients: 85 (16%) underwent repeat BLC (range: 2-5). Sensitivity of WLC, BLC, and the combination for diagnosis of any malignant lesion was 76%, 91%, and 98.5%, respectively. Addition of BLC to standard WLC increased detection rate by 12% for any papillary lesion and 43% for carcinoma in-situ. Within the WLC negative group, an additional 206 lesions in 133 (25%) patients were detected exclusively with BLC. In multifocal disease, BLC resulted in AUA risk-group migration occurred in 33 (6%) patients and a change in recommended management in 74 (14%). False-positive rate was 25% for WLC and 30% for BLC. One mild dermatologic hypersensitivity reaction (0.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: BLC increases detection rates of carcinoma in-situ and papillary lesions over WLC alone and can change management in 14% of cases. Repeat use of HAL for BLC is safe.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Blue light cystoscopy; Diagnosis; Photodynamic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29859728     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  17 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the metabolomic study of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Amara; Venkatrao Vantaku; Yair Lotan; Nagireddy Putluri
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Ferrochelatase Deficiency Abrogated the Enhancement of Aminolevulinic Acid-mediated Protoporphyrin IX by Iron Chelator Deferoxamine.

Authors:  Pratheeba Palasuberniam; Daniel Kraus; Matthew Mansi; Alexander Braun; Richard Howley; Kenneth A Myers; Bin Chen
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma in situ using blue light cystoscopy and the utility of immunohistochemistry in blue light-positive lesions diagnosed as atypical.

Authors:  Filippo Pederzoli; Belkiss Murati Amador; Iryna Samarska; Kara A Lombardo; Max Kates; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Andres Matoso
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  A case in which bladder cancer invaded the ureteral orifice and was resected via photodynamic diagnosis-assisted transurethral resection involving orally administered 5-aminolevulinic acid.

Authors:  Keitaro Watanabe; Suguru Shirotake; Yuta Umezawa; Takayuki Takahashi; Takeshi Yamanaka; Noriaki L Santo; Takashi Okabe; Gou Kaneko; Katsuhiro Sano; Masanori Yasuda; Kent Kanao; Masafumi Oyama; Koshiro Nishimoto
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-13

5.  Guideline of guidelines: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Pavlos Omorphos; John Carlo Pansaon Piedad; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-09-21

6.  The Usefulness of Cell-Based and Liquid-Based Urine Tests in Clarifying the Diagnosis and Monitoring the Course of Urothelial Carcinoma. Identification of Novel, Potentially Actionable, RB1 and ERBB2 Somatic Mutations.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kałużewski; Grzegorz K Przybylski; Michał Bednarek; Sławomir Glazar; Magdalena Grabiec; Adam Jędrzejczyk; Łukasz Kępczyński; Izabela Kubiak; Dorota Kucharska; Agnieszka Morel; Magdalena Owczarek; Marek Rożniecki; Jordan Sałamunia; Dominika Szewczyk; Jarosław Szwalski; Bogdan Kałużewski
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of NMP 22 and urine cytology for detection of transitional cell carcinoma urinary bladder taking cystoscopy as gold standard.

Authors:  Muhammad Tanveer Sajid; Muhammad Rafiq Zafar; Hussain Ahmad; Saif Ullah; Zahoor Iqbal Mirza; Khubaib Shahzad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Detection of carcinogen-induced bladder cancer by fluorocoxib A.

Authors:  Jennifer Bourn; Kusum Rathore; Robert Donnell; Wesley White; Md Jashim Uddin; Lawrence Marnett; Maria Cekanova
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Imaging and Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo K Wong; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Corey T Jensen; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Nanotechnology in Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Mahmood Barani; Seyedeh Maryam Hosseinikhah; Abbas Rahdar; Leila Farhoudi; Rabia Arshad; Magali Cucchiarini; Sadanand Pandey
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.