Literature DB >> 29859724

Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures.

Joshua A Parry1, Nicolas M Hernandez1, Daniel J Berry1, Matthew P Abdel1, Brandon J Yuan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to review Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic hip fractures treated with uncemented modular fluted tapered stems to analyze survivorship, risk factors for stem subsidence, and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We identified 61 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic hip fractures treated with modular fluted tapered implants. Survivorship, radiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes were assessed. The mean age at the time of surgery was 72 years, mean body mass index was 30, and mean follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 2-10 years).
RESULTS: Survivorship free of reoperation or implant revision at 5 years was 89% and 93%, respectively. Eight (13%) stems subsided a mean distance of 18 ± 8 mm (range, 8-28 mm). Stem subsidence was not correlated with age, gender, Vancouver fracture classification, stem bypass, stem length, or stem diameter. Subsidence was correlated with Dorr C type femora (50% vs 7%, 95% confidence interval 9%-72%; P = .007) and strut grafting (50% vs 9%, 95% confidence interval 6%-70%; P = .01). All cases of subsidence stabilized without revision. Subsidence was not correlated with nonunion, reoperation, revision, or a clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Modular fluted tapered stems had excellent survivorship free of reoperation and implant revision when used for the treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures. Poor bone morphology and the use of strut grafts, both proxies for compromised bone stock and distal fracture patterns, were correlated with stem subsidence. All subsided stems stabilized, and noted subsidence did not portend a worse clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vancouver classification; modular fluted tapered stems; periprosthetic femur fracture; revision total hip arthroplasty; subsidence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29859724     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of two tapered fluted modular titanium (TFMT) stems used in revision hip arthroplasty from a single center.

Authors:  Rajesh Pawar; Rye Yap; Jody Blow; Mohanrao Garabadi; Mark Rowsell; Hasnat Minhas; Prasad Antapur
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-01

2.  Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; James Millar; Jonathan Quayle; Bill Farrington; Peter Nicholas Misur
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Long-term survival after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty for treatment of acute femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study with a mean 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Meiji Chen; Weiguang Yu; Xiulan Han; Junxing Ye; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Factors influencing results and complications in proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study at 1- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-07-26

5.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.