Literature DB >> 29859649

Nipple-areolar complex ischemia and necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Sung Jae Ahn1, Tae Yong Woo1, Dong Won Lee1, Dae Hyun Lew1, Seung Yong Song2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), combined with immediate breast reconstruction, has become the preferred surgical option to achieve better patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome. However, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) ischemia and necrosis are common complications following nipple-sparing technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 220 breasts that underwent NSM and immediate reconstruction from May 2010 to December 2016 at our institute. For accurate evaluation of ischemia rate after nipple-sparing mastectomy, we suggested a nipple-areolar ischemia grading system. We also found association between various factors and complications of nipple-areolar complex through statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Among 220 breasts that underwent NSM in 207 patients, ischemia occurred in 141 (64.1%) breasts. However, necrosis required surgical reoperation in only 69 (31.3%) breasts. Patient factor affecting NAC complications was existence of ptosis. Also, surgical techniques for periareolar incision as well as oncologic surgeon's technique impacted NAC necrosis. Reconstruction methods including direct-to-implant, latissimus dorsi island flap with implant, and transverse rectus abdominis free flap showed higher rate of necrosis compared to tissue-expander reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: We clarified factors that affect NAC necrosis. Among them, modifiable factors were skin tension and periareolar incision. When periareolar incision is necessary, lower periareolar incision is safer than upper periareolar incision to preserve vascularity of NAC.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ischemia; Necrosis; Nipple -areolar complex; Nipple sparing mastectomy; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29859649     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  12 in total

1.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results From the INSPIRE Registry.

Authors:  Antonio J Esgueva; Iris Noordhoek; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Martin Espinosa-Bravo; Zoltán Mátrai; Andrii Zhygulin; Arvids Irmejs; Carlos Mavioso; Francesco Meani; Eduardo González; Murat Özdemir; Tanir Allweis; Karol Rogowski; Catarina Rodrigues Dos Santos; Henrique Mora; Riccardo Ponzone; Domenico Samorani; Cornelis van de Velde; Riccardo A Audisio; Isabel T Rubio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction: Does Incision Matter?

Authors:  Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.268

3.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction - early complications and outcomes of the treatment.

Authors:  Artur Bocian; Piotr Kędzierawski; Krzysztof Kurczych; Przemysław Jasnowski; Daniel Maliszewski; Agnieszka Kołacińska
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2020-10-02

4.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction with or Without Skin Reduction in Patients with Large Ptotic Breasts: A Case-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Sukru Yazar; Fuat Baris Bengur; Altug Altinkaya; Halil Kara; Cihan Uras
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for mastectomy flap ischaemia: A case series of 50 breasts.

Authors:  Nicole E Spruijt; Lisette T Hoekstra; Johan Wilmink; Maarten M Hoogbergen
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.887

6.  Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Jeea Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Haemin Lee; Dong Won Lee; Seung Yong Song; Dae Hyun Lew; Jee Ye Kim; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Postoperative pain assessment of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral prosthesis breast reconstruction: a comparison with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Jiae Moon; Jeea Lee; Dong Won Lee; Hye Sun Lee; Da Jung Nam; Min Jung Kim; Na Young Kim; Hyung Seok Park
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Comparison of complications according to incision types in nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Soeun Park; Changik Yoon; Soong June Bae; Chihwan Cha; Dooreh Kim; Janghee Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Tai Suk Roh; Young Seok Kim; Joon Jeong
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  The Role of Sharp Dissection in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Safe Procedure with No Necrosis of the Nipple-Areolar Complex.

Authors:  Ci-Qiu Yang; Fei Ji; Hong-Fei Gao; Liu-Lu Zhang; Mei Yang; Teng Zhu; Min-Yi Chen; Jie-Qing Li; Kun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Impact of Body Composition on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiae Moon; Jeea Lee; Dong Won Lee; Hye Jung Shin; Sumin Lee; Yhenseung Kang; Na Young Kim; Hyung Seok Park
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.