BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess agreement between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histopathology for healed coronary plaques (HCPs) in human coronary arteries ex vivo, and to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of HCPs in vivo. METHODS: Ex vivo OCT images were co-registered with histopathology in 144 cross-sections with ≥50% stenosis. Of these, 30 randomly selected pairs were employed to define morphological features of OCT for HCPs (OCT-derived HCPs); the remaining 114 pairs were used to evaluate the accuracy of OCT in detecting histologically-defined HCPs. In a clinical study, 60 target lesions from 60 patients with stable ischemic heart disease were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of OCT-derived HCPs. Plaque characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the autopsy study, an OCT-derived HCP was defined as a plaque with heterogeneous signal-rich layers of different optical signal density. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of OCT-derived HCP to detect histologically-defined HCPs were 81%, 98%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. In the clinical study, 46 (77%) had OCT-derived HCPs. Both microvessels and macrophages were more frequently identified in OCT-derived HCPs compared to their counterparts (43% vs. 0%; p<0.01, 70% vs. 21%; p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An ex vivo OCT image has a good agreement with histology for HCPs detection. HCPs were frequently identified by OCT in target lesions in stable ischemic heart disease patients. OCT may be a useful intracoronary imaging for HCPs detection in vivo.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess agreement between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histopathology for healed coronary plaques (HCPs) in human coronary arteries ex vivo, and to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of HCPs in vivo. METHODS: Ex vivo OCT images were co-registered with histopathology in 144 cross-sections with ≥50% stenosis. Of these, 30 randomly selected pairs were employed to define morphological features of OCT for HCPs (OCT-derived HCPs); the remaining 114 pairs were used to evaluate the accuracy of OCT in detecting histologically-defined HCPs. In a clinical study, 60 target lesions from 60 patients with stable ischemic heart disease were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of OCT-derived HCPs. Plaque characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the autopsy study, an OCT-derived HCP was defined as a plaque with heterogeneous signal-rich layers of different optical signal density. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of OCT-derived HCP to detect histologically-defined HCPs were 81%, 98%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. In the clinical study, 46 (77%) had OCT-derived HCPs. Both microvessels and macrophages were more frequently identified in OCT-derived HCPs compared to their counterparts (43% vs. 0%; p<0.01, 70% vs. 21%; p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An ex vivo OCT image has a good agreement with histology for HCPs detection. HCPs were frequently identified by OCT in target lesions in stable ischemic heart diseasepatients. OCT may be a useful intracoronary imaging for HCPs detection in vivo.
Authors: Makoto Araki; Seung-Jung Park; Harold L Dauerman; Shiro Uemura; Jung-Sun Kim; Carlo Di Mario; Thomas W Johnson; Giulio Guagliumi; Adnan Kastrati; Michael Joner; Niels Ramsing Holm; Fernando Alfonso; William Wijns; Tom Adriaenssens; Holger Nef; Gilles Rioufol; Nicolas Amabile; Geraud Souteyrand; Nicolas Meneveau; Edouard Gerbaud; Maksymilian P Opolski; Nieves Gonzalo; Guillermo J Tearney; Brett Bouma; Aaron D Aguirre; Gary S Mintz; Gregg W Stone; Christos V Bourantas; Lorenz Räber; Sebastiano Gili; Kyoichi Mizuno; Shigeki Kimura; Toshiro Shinke; Myeong-Ki Hong; Yangsoo Jang; Jin Man Cho; Bryan P Yan; Italo Porto; Giampaolo Niccoli; Rocco A Montone; Vikas Thondapu; Michail I Papafaklis; Lampros K Michalis; Harmony Reynolds; Jacqueline Saw; Peter Libby; Giora Weisz; Mario Iannaccone; Tommaso Gori; Konstantinos Toutouzas; Taishi Yonetsu; Yoshiyasu Minami; Masamichi Takano; O Christopher Raffel; Osamu Kurihara; Tsunenari Soeda; Tomoyo Sugiyama; Hyung Oh Kim; Tetsumin Lee; Takumi Higuma; Akihiro Nakajima; Erika Yamamoto; Krzysztof L Bryniarski; Luca Di Vito; Rocco Vergallo; Francesco Fracassi; Michele Russo; Lena M Seegers; Iris McNulty; Sangjoon Park; Marc Feldman; Javier Escaned; Francesco Prati; Eloisa Arbustini; Fausto J Pinto; Ron Waksman; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Akiko Maehara; Ziad Ali; Aloke V Finn; Renu Virmani; Annapoorna S Kini; Joost Daemen; Teruyoshi Kume; Kiyoshi Hibi; Atsushi Tanaka; Takashi Akasaka; Takashi Kubo; Satoshi Yasuda; Kevin Croce; Juan F Granada; Amir Lerman; Abhiram Prasad; Evelyn Regar; Yoshihiko Saito; Mullasari Ajit Sankardas; Vijayakumar Subban; Neil J Weissman; Yundai Chen; Bo Yu; Stephen J Nicholls; Peter Barlis; Nick E J West; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Jong Chul Ye; Jouke Dijkstra; Hang Lee; Jagat Narula; Filippo Crea; Sunao Nakamura; Tsunekazu Kakuta; James Fujimoto; Valentin Fuster; Ik-Kyung Jang Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 49.421