Literature DB >> 29859297

The hypoxic tumor microenvironment in vivo selects tumor cells with increased survival against genotoxic stresses.

Hoon Kim1, Qun Lin1, Zhong Yun2.   

Abstract

Tumor sensitivity to radiation therapy has been known to be dependent on O2 concentrations. However, radiosensitivity of naturally occurring hypoxic tumor cells remains to be well fully investigated in direct comparison to that of their adjacent non-hypoxic tumor cells within the same tumor. We developed a hypoxia-sensing xenograft model using the hypoxia-response element (HRE)-driven enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) as a hypoxia reporter to identify hypoxic tumor cells in situ. Here, we have found that naturally hypoxic tumor cells are moderately radioresistant compared to their neighboring non-hypoxic tumor cells in the same tumor. These naturally hypoxic tumor cells are proficient at repairing DNA damages and resist apoptosis induced by genotoxic stresses, which involves activation of the ATM/CHK1/CHK2 DNA damage-sensing pathway. Inhibition of the checkpoint kinases sensitizes the ex vivo hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing irradiation. Second, the new functional phenotypes acquired by the hypoxic tumor cells in vivo are stable even after they are maintained under non-hypoxic conditions. These new results strongly suggest that the hypoxic tumor microenvironment is capable of selecting stable tumor cell populations with increased resistance to genotoxic stresses and enhanced survival.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checkpoint kinases; DNA damage response; Hypoxia; Tumor microenvironment; Xenograft

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29859297      PMCID: PMC6026555          DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  37 in total

1.  Oxygen distribution in squamous cell carcinoma metastases and its relationship to outcome of radiation therapy.

Authors:  R A Gatenby; H B Kessler; J S Rosenblum; L R Coia; P J Moldofsky; W H Hartz; G J Broder
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Peter Vaupel; Arnulf Mayer
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 3.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying oxygen-dependent radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Qun Lin; Zhong Yun
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  The clinical significance of hypoxia in human cancers.

Authors:  Neesha Dhani; Anthony Fyles; David Hedley; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Development of a hypoxia-responsive vector for tumor-specific gene therapy.

Authors:  T Shibata; A J Giaccia; J M Brown
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Phenotypic heterogeneity of disseminated tumour cells is preset by primary tumour hypoxic microenvironments.

Authors:  Georg Fluegen; Alvaro Avivar-Valderas; Yarong Wang; Michael R Padgen; James K Williams; Ana Rita Nobre; Veronica Calvo; Julie F Cheung; Jose Javier Bravo-Cordero; David Entenberg; James Castracane; Vladislav Verkhusha; Patricia J Keely; John Condeelis; Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  Tumor microenvironmental physiology and its implications for radiation oncology.

Authors:  Peter Vaupel
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.934

8.  Hypoxia and radiation therapy: past history, ongoing research, and future promise.

Authors:  Sara Rockwell; Iwona T Dobrucki; Eugene Y Kim; S Tucker Marrison; Van Thuc Vu
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.222

9.  Oxygenation of carcinomas of the uterine cervix: evaluation by computerized O2 tension measurements.

Authors:  M Höckel; K Schlenger; C Knoop; P Vaupel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Comparisons among pimonidazole binding, oxygen electrode measurements, and radiation response in C3H mouse tumors.

Authors:  J A Raleigh; S C Chou; G E Arteel; M R Horsman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Integrated cancer tissue engineering models for precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael E Bregenzer; Eric N Horst; Pooja Mehta; Caymen M Novak; Shreya Raghavan; Catherine S Snyder; Geeta Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Breast Cancer Stem Cells as Drivers of Tumor Chemoresistance, Dormancy and Relapse: New Challenges and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Maria Laura De Angelis; Federica Francescangeli; Ann Zeuner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  The anti-tumoral effects of the oxygen carrier YQ23 in a triple-negative breast cancer syngeneic model.

Authors:  Elysian Chow; Jonathan S H Lau; Terence Wai; Ian P Y Lam
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.