Literature DB >> 29859260

Pathways to cognitive design.

Annie E Wertz1, Cristina Moya2.   

Abstract

Despite a shared recognition that the design of the human mind and the design of human culture are tightly linked, researchers in the evolutionary social sciences tend to specialize in understanding one at the expense of the other. The disciplinary boundaries roughly correspond to research traditions that focus more on natural selection and those that focus more on cultural evolution. In this paper, we articulate how two research traditions within the evolutionary social sciences-evolutionary psychology and cultural evolution-approach the study of design. We focus our analysis on the design of cognitive mechanisms that are the result of the interplay of genetic and cultural evolution. We aim to show how the approaches of these two research traditions can complement each other, and provide a framework for developing a wider range of testable hypotheses about cognitive design. To do so, we provide concrete illustrations of how this integrated approach can be used to interrogate cognitive design using examples from our own work on plant and symbolic group boundary cognition. We hope this recognition of different pathways to design will broaden the hypothesis space in the evolutionary social sciences and encourage methodological pluralism in the investigation of the mind.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cultural evolution; Genetic evolution; Natural selection; Plant cognition; Symbolic group boundary cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29859260     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  2 in total

1.  Why Evolutionary Psychology Should Abandon Modularity.

Authors:  David Pietraszewski; Annie E Wertz
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Selection, adaptation, inheritance and design in human culture: the view from the Price equation.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.