Literature DB >> 29858882

First clinical use of novel ablation catheter incorporating local impedance data.

Claire A Martin1,2,3, Ruairidh Martin1,4, Parag R Gajendragadkar2, Philippe Maury5, Masateru Takigawa1, Ghassen Cheniti1, Antonio Frontera1, Takeshi Kitamura1, Josselin Duchateau1, Konstantinos Vlachos1, Felix Bourier1, Anna Lam1, Stephen Lord4, Stephen Murray4, Ewen Shephard4, Thomas Pambrun1, Arnaud Denis1, Nicolas Derval1, Meleze Hocini1, Michel Haissaguerre1, Pierre Jais1, Frederic Sacher1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Successful catheter ablation is limited by both poor spatial resolution of abnormal local signals and inability to deliver an effective lesion due to poor tissue contact. We report first worldwide use of the Intellanav MiFi OI catheter (Boston Scientific), providing ultra-high density mapping and incorporating a "DirectSense" algorithm to measure local tissue impedance (LI). METHODS AND
RESULTS: 31 patients (65±6 years, 20 male) underwent ablation. LI from the catheter, generator impedance (GI) and maximum electrogram amplitude were recorded in the blood pool, and in regions from healthy to dense scar before, during and after ablation. The catheter demonstrated clear nearfield signal where standard bipolar recordings included farfield signal. LI was lower in dense scar than either healthy tissue or blood pool, and demonstrated an exponential relationship with maximum electrogram amplitude. Maximum LI drop on ablation linearly correlated with initial LI. The median LI drop for successful lesions, resulting in lack of local tissue capture, was 16.0Ω (12.1-19.8 Ω) for LV and 14.6 Ω (10.0-18.3 Ω) for LA, which was larger than for unsuccessful lesions (LV: 9.4 Ω [5.4-15.6 Ω] P = 0.001; LA: 6.8 Ω [4.7-13.0 Ω], P = 0.049). LI percentage drop was also significantly larger for successful than unsuccessful lesions (LV: 17.1 Ω [14.0-19.6 Ω] vs. 10.6 Ω (7.1-16.5 Ω) P = 0.002; LA: 14.2 Ω [10.8-19.5 Ω] vs. 7.5Ω [5.1-11.0 Ω], P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: This novel catheter gives reproducible recordings of local impedance, which are dependent on scar level. Absolute LI drop, and also percentage drop, on ablation may give an indication of tissue contact and subsequent effective lesion formation.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial tachycardia; catheter ablation; electrophysiology; impedance; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858882     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  10 in total

1.  Local impedance-guided ablation and ultra-high density mapping versus conventional or contact force-guided ablation with mapping for treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter.

Authors:  Karan Saraf; Nicholas Black; Clifford J Garratt; Sahrkaw A Muhyaldeen; Gwilym M Morris
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  Optimal local impedance drops for an effective radiofrequency ablation during cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation.

Authors:  Takehito Sasaki; Kohki Nakamura; Mitsuho Inoue; Kentaro Minami; Yuko Miki; Koji Goto; Yutaka Take; Kenichi Kaseno; Eiji Yamashita; Keiko Koyama; Shigeto Naito
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 3.  The challenge of optimising ablation lesions in catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Riccardo Proietti; Luca Lichelli; Nicolas Lellouche; Tarvinder Dhanjal
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-12-28

4.  How to leverage local impedance to guide effective ablation strategy: A case series.

Authors:  Francesco Solimene; Francesco Maddaluno; Maurizio Malacrida; Giuseppe Stabile
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-07

5.  Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography monitoring of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in left atrium of living swine.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhao; Ohad Ziv; Reza Mohammadpour; Benjamin Crosby; Walter J Hoyt; Michael W Jenkins; Christopher Snyder; Christine Hendon; Kenneth R Laurita; Andrew M Rollins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Local impedance measurements during contact force-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for predicting an effective radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Takehito Sasaki; Kohki Nakamura; Kentaro Minami; Yutaka Take; Yosuke Nakatani; Yuko Miki; Koji Goto; Kenichi Kaseno; Eiji Yamashita; Keiko Koyama; Shigeto Naito
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Local Electrical Impedance Mapping of the Atria: Conclusions on Substrate Properties and Confounding Factors.

Authors:  Laura Anna Unger; Leonie Schicketanz; Tobias Oesterlein; Michael Stritt; Annika Haas; Carmen Martínez Antón; Kerstin Schmidt; Olaf Doessel; Armin Luik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Role of catheter location on local impedance measurements and clinical outcome with the new direct sense technology in cardiac ablation procedures.

Authors:  E Pesch; L Riesinger; N Vonderlin; J Kupusovic; M Koehler; F Bruns; R A Janosi; S Kochhäuser; D Dobrev; T Rassaf; R Wakili; J Siebermair
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-09-08

9.  Local catheter impedance drop during pulmonary vein isolation predicts acute conduction block in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: initial results of the LOCALIZE clinical trial.

Authors:  Moloy Das; Armin Luik; Ewen Shepherd; Matthew Sulkin; Jacob Laughner; Tobias Oesterlein; Elizabeth Duffy; Christian Meyer; Pierre Jais; Josselin Duchateau; Arthur Yue; Waqas Ullah; Pablo Ramos; Ignacio García-Bolao
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Change in the local impedance and electrograms recorded by a micro-electrode tip catheter during initial atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Kenji Hashimoto; Ippei Tsuzuki; Yuta Seki; Susumu Ibe; Terumasa Yamashita; Hiroshi Miyama; Taishi Fujisawa; Yoshinori Katsumata; Takehiro Kimura; Keiichi Fukuda; Seiji Takatsuki
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-04-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.