Literature DB >> 29858464

Effects of frequency, intensity, duration and volume of walking interventions on CVD risk factors: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials among inactive healthy adults.

Pekka Oja1, Paul Kelly2, Elaine M Murtagh3, Marie H Murphy4, Charlie Foster5, Sylvia Titze6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Walking interventions in healthy populations show clinically relevant improvements for many cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. We aimed to assess the changes in CVD risk factors and the dose-response relationship between frequency, intensity, duration and volume of walking and cardiovascular risk factors based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases searched from January 1971 to April 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Walking RCTs reporting one or more CVD risk factor outcomes; trials including at least one group with walking intervention and a no-walking control group; duration ≥8 weeks; participants ≥18 years old, inactive but healthy; risk factors assessed preintervention and postintervention; English-language articles in peer-reviewed journals.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven RCTs, involving 2001 participants (81% women) and assessing 13 CVD risk factors, were identified. Pooled meta-analysis showed favourable effects (P≤0.05) of walking intervention for seven CVD risk factors (body mass, body mass index, body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose and VO2max). There were no significant effects (P>0.05) for waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and four blood lipid variables.Despite testing 91 possible dose-response relationships, linear meta-regression analysis adjusted for age indicated just 7 (or 7.7%) statistically significant findings. SUMMARY/
CONCLUSION: Walking interventions benefit a number of CVD risk factors. Despite multiple studies and tested metrics, only a few dose-response relationships were identified and the possibility of chance findings cannot be ruled out. There is insufficient evidence to quantify the frequency, length, bout duration, intensity and volume of the walking required to improve CVD risk factors. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039409. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health; meta-analysis; physical activity; walking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858464     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  26 in total

Review 1.  Running to Lower Resting Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yutaka Igarashi; Yoshie Nogami
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The physical activity health paradox and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional compositional data analysis in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Melker S Johansson; Andreas Holtermann; Jacob L Marott; Eva Prescott; Peter Schnohr; Mette Korshøj; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prospective Associations of Daily Step Counts and Intensity With Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Mortality and All-Cause Mortality.

Authors:  Borja Del Pozo Cruz; Matthew N Ahmadi; I-Min Lee; Emmanuel Stamatakis
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 44.409

4.  Evaluation of a Population-Wide Mobile Health Physical Activity Program in 696 907 Adults in Singapore.

Authors:  Jiali Yao; Nicole Lim; Jeremy Tan; Andre Matthias Müller; Rob Martinus van Dam; Cynthia Chen; Chuen Seng Tan; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 5.  Getting Fit to Counteract Cognitive Aging: Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Michelle W Voss; Shivangi Jain
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 6.  Dependence of Seasonal Dynamics in Healthy People's Circulating Lipids and Carbohydrates on Regional Climate: Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  N V Kuzmenko; B F Shchegolev
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2022-08-05

7.  Walking for hypertension.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lee; Caroline A Mulvaney; Yoko Kin Yoke Wong; Edwin Sy Chan; Michael C Watson; Hui-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-24

8.  Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia.

Authors:  Katherine S Hall; Eric T Hyde; David R Bassett; Susan A Carlson; Mercedes R Carnethon; Ulf Ekelund; Kelly R Evenson; Deborah A Galuska; William E Kraus; I-Min Lee; Charles E Matthews; John D Omura; Amanda E Paluch; William I Thomas; Janet E Fulton
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lianne M J Sanders; Tibor Hortobágyi; Sacha la Bastide-van Gemert; Eddy A van der Zee; Marieke J G van Heuvelen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Associations of Physical Behaviours and Behavioural Reallocations with Markers of Metabolic Health: A Compositional Data Analysis.

Authors:  Gregory J H Biddle; Charlotte L Edwardson; Joseph Henson; Melanie J Davies; Kamlesh Khunti; Alex V Rowlands; Thomas Yates
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.