Literature DB >> 29858395

Change in health care use after coordinated care planning: a quasi-experimental study.

Iwona A Bielska1, Kelly Cimek2, Dale Guenter2, Kelly O'Halloran2, Chloe Nyitray2, Linda Hunter2, Walter P Wodchis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether patients with a coordinated care plan developed using the Health Links model of care in the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant Local Health Integration Network differed in their use of health care (no. of emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, length of inpatient stay) when compared with a matched control group of patients with no care plans.
METHODS: We performed a propensity score-matched study of 12 months pre- and 12 months post-health care use. Patients who had a coordinated care plan that started between 2013 and 2015 were propensity score matched to patients in a control group. Patient information was obtained from Client Health and Related Information System, National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and Discharge Abstract Database. Differences in health care use pre- and post-index date were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A negative binomial regression model was fit for each health care use outcome at 6 and 12 months post-index date.
RESULTS: Six hundred coordinated care plan enrollees and 25 449 potential control patients were included in the matching algorithm, which resulted in 548 matched pairs (91.3%). Both groups showed decreases in health care use post-index date. Matched care plan enrollees had significantly fewer emergency department visits at 6 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.91, p < 0.01) and 12 months post-index date (IRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p < 0.05) compared with the matched controls. Other use parameters were not significantly different between care plan enrollees and the control group.
INTERPRETATION: Care plan enrollees show a decrease in the number of times they visit emergency departments, which may be attributed to integrated and coordinated care planning. This association should be examined to see whether these reductions persist for more than 1 year. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858395      PMCID: PMC5984145          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  17 in total

1.  High health care utilization and costs associated with lower socio-economic status: results from a linked dataset.

Authors:  Mark Lemstra; Johan Mackenbach; Cory Neudorf; Ushasri Nannapaneni
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun

2.  A 3-year study of high-cost users of health care.

Authors:  Walter P Wodchis; Peter C Austin; David A Henry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Integrated care prevents hospitalisations for exacerbations in COPD patients.

Authors:  A Casas; T Troosters; J Garcia-Aymerich; J Roca; C Hernández; A Alonso; F del Pozo; P de Toledo; J M Antó; R Rodríguez-Roisín; M Decramer
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials.

Authors:  Deborah Peikes; Arnold Chen; Jennifer Schore; Randall Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

6.  Fully integrated care for frail elderly: two American models.

Authors:  D L Kodner; C K Kyriacou
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  The integrated care pathway reduced the number of hospital days by half: a prospective comparative study of patients with acute hip fracture.

Authors:  Lars-Eric Olsson; Jón Karlsson; Inger Ekman
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Stokes; Maria Panagioti; Rahul Alam; Kath Checkland; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Peter Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High-cost health care users in Ontario, Canada: demographic, socio-economic, and health status characteristics.

Authors:  Laura C Rosella; Tiffany Fitzpatrick; Walter P Wodchis; Andrew Calzavara; Heather Manson; Vivek Goel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Connecting People With Multimorbidity to Interprofessional Teams Using Telemedicine.

Authors:  Pauline Pariser; Thuy-Nga Tia Pham; Judith B Brown; Moira Stewart; Jocelyn Charles
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.166

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.