Literature DB >> 29858176

Measurement properties of the ASAS Health Index: results of a global study in patients with axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis.

Uta Kiltz1, Désirée van der Heijde2, Annelies Boonen3, Nurullah Akkoc4, Wilson Bautista-Molano5, Ruben Burgos-Vargas6, James Cheng-Chung Wei7, Praveena Chiowchanwisawakit8, Maxime Dougados9, M Tuncay Duruoz10, Bassel Kamal Elzorkany11, Inna Gaydukova12, Lianne S Gensler13, Michele Gilio14, Simeon Grazio15, Jieruo Gu16, Robert D Inman17, Tae-Jong Kim18, Victoria Navarro-Compan19, Helena Marzo-Ortega20, Salih Ozgocmen21, Fernando Pimentel Dos Santos22, Michael Schirmer23, Simon Stebbings24, Filip E Van den Bosch25,26, Astrid van Tubergen3, Juergen Braun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate construct validity, interpretability, reliability and responsiveness as well as determination of cut-off points for good and poor health within the original English version and the 18 translations of the disease-specific Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) in 23 countries worldwide in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA).
METHODS: A representative sample of patients with SpA fulfilling the ASAS classification criteria for axial (axSpA) or peripheral SpA was used. The construct validity of the ASAS HI was tested using Spearman correlation with several standard health outcomes for axSpA. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) in patients with stable disease (interval 4-7 days). In patients who required an escalation of therapy because of high disease activity, responsiveness was tested after 2-24weeks using standardised response mean (SRM).
RESULTS: Among the 1548 patients, 64.9% were men, with a mean (SD) age 42.0 (13.4) years. Construct validity ranged from low (age: 0.10) to high (Bath AnkylosingSpondylitisFunctioning Index: 0.71). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α of 0.93). The reliability among 578 patients was good (ICC=0.87 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.89)). Responsiveness among 246 patients was moderate-large (SRM=-0.44 for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, -0.69 for conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and -0.85 for tumour necrosis factor inhibitor). The smallest detectable change was 3.0. Values ≤5.0 have balanced specificity to distinguish good health as opposed to moderate health, and values ≥12.0 are specific to represent poor health as opposed to moderate health.
CONCLUSIONS: The ASAS HI proved to be valid, reliable and responsive. It can be used to evaluate the impact of SpA and its treatment on functioning and health. Furthermore, comparison of disease impact between populations is possible. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankylosing spondylitis; outcomes research; spondyloarthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858176     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  20 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology in Egypt: back to the future.

Authors:  Tamer A Gheita; Nahla N Eesa
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Pros, Cons, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jean W Liew; Maureen Dubreuil
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 3.  Disease activity indices in psoriatic arthritis: current and evolving concepts.

Authors:  Chrysoula G Gialouri; George E Fragoulis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Radiomic Quantification for MRI Assessment of Sacroiliac Joints of Patients with Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Ariane Priscilla Magalhães Tenório; José Raniery Ferreira-Junior; Vitor Faeda Dalto; Matheus Calil Faleiros; Rodrigo Luppino Assad; Paulo Louzada-Junior; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  The identification of association between ultrasonographic enthesitis and the ASAS Health Index in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Abdulvahap Kahveci; Yuzlem Gyuner Sıdzhımlı; Seçilay Güneş; Alper Gümüştepe; Caner Baysan; Şebnem Ataman
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 6.  Sexual dimorphism in the prevalence, manifestation and outcomes of axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Rachael Stovall; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma; Shao-Hsien Liu; Tamara Rusman; Lianne S Gensler
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 32.286

Review 7.  Treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis - what about physical function and activity?

Authors:  Jürgen Braun; Xenofon Baraliakos; Uta Kiltz
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Validation and reliability of translation of the ASAS Health Index in a Colombian Spanish-speaking population with spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Wilson Bautista-Molano; Robert B M Landewé; Uta Kiltz; Rafael Valle-Oñate; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and patient-reported outcomes in axial SpA: a systematic review and a call for action.

Authors:  Santiago Rodrigues-Manica; Joana Silva; Rita Cruz-Machado; Constança Coelho; Joana Duarte; Elsa Vieira-Sousa; José Tavares-Costa; Fernando M Pimentel-Santos
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Responsiveness of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire in patients with spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Helen Hoi Lun Tsang; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Carlos King Ho Wong; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Chak Sing Lau; Ho Yin Chung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.