Literature DB >> 29856559

Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey.

Michael B First1, Tahilia J Rebello2, Jared W Keeley3, Rachna Bhargava4, Yunfei Dai5, Maya Kulygina6, Chihiro Matsumoto7, Rebeca Robles8, Anne-Claire Stona9, Geoffrey M Reed2,10.   

Abstract

We report on a global survey of diagnosing mental health professionals, primarily psychiatrists, conducted as a part of the development of the ICD-11 mental and behavioural disorders classification. The survey assessed these professionals' use of various components of the ICD-10 and the DSM, their attitudes concerning the utility of these systems, and usage of "residual" (i.e., "other" or "unspecified") categories. In previous surveys, most mental health professionals reported they often use a formal classification system in everyday clinical work, but very little is known about precisely how they are using those systems. For example, it has been suggested that most clinicians employ only the diagnostic labels or codes from the ICD-10 in order to meet administrative requirements. The present survey was conducted with clinicians who were members of the Global Clinical Practice Network (GCPN), established by the World Health Organization as a tool for global participation in ICD-11 field studies. A total of 1,764 GCPN members from 92 countries completed the survey, with 1,335 answering the questions with reference to the ICD-10 and 429 to the DSM (DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5). The most frequent reported use of the classification systems was for administrative or billing purposes, with 68.1% reporting often or routinely using them for that purpose. A bit more than half (57.4%) of respondents reported often or routinely going through diagnostic guidelines or criteria systematically to determine whether they apply to individual patients. Although ICD-10 users were more likely than DSM-5 users to utilize the classification for administrative purposes, other differences were either slight or not significant. Both classifications were rated to be most useful for assigning a diagnosis, communicating with other health care professionals and teaching, and least useful for treatment selection and determining prognosis. ICD-10 was rated more useful than DSM-5 for administrative purposes. A majority of clinicians reported using "residual" categories at least sometimes, with around 12% of ICD-10 users and 19% of DSM users employing them often or routinely, most commonly for clinical presentations that do not conform to a specific diagnostic category or when there is insufficient information to make a more specific diagnosis. These results provide the most comprehensive available information about the use of diagnostic classifications of mental disorders in ordinary clinical practice.
© 2018 World Psychiatric Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classifications of mental disorders; DSM-5; Global Clinical Practice Network; ICD-10; ICD-11; clinical utility; ordinary clinical practice; psychiatric diagnosis; residual diagnostic categories; use for administrative purposes

Year:  2018        PMID: 29856559      PMCID: PMC5980454          DOI: 10.1002/wps.20525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Psychiatry        ISSN: 1723-8617            Impact factor:   49.548


  20 in total

Review 1.  Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology.

Authors:  T A Widiger; L A Clark
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  International surveys on the use of ICD-10 and related diagnostic systems.

Authors:  Juan E Mezzich
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2002 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 3.  Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses.

Authors:  Michael B First; Harold Alan Pincus; John B Levine; Janet B W Williams; Bedirhan Ustun; Roger Peele
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Psychiatric classifications: validity and utility.

Authors:  Assen Jablensky
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  The use of DSM-III in the United States: a case of not going by the book.

Authors:  V C Jampala; F S Sierles; M A Taylor
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.735

6.  Comparison of psychiatrists' views on classification of mental disorders in four East Asian countries/area.

Authors:  Yuriko Suzuki; Tomohisa Takahashi; Masanori Nagamine; Yizhuang Zou; Jiefeng Cui; Biao Han; Jong-Ik Park; Hai-Gwo Hwu; Chiao-Chicy Chen; Chao-Cheng Lin; Naotaka Shinfuku
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2010-03-04

7.  DSM-III and DSM-III-R: what are American psychiatrists using and why?

Authors:  M Zimmerman; V C Jampala; F S Sierles; M A Taylor
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.735

8.  Child psychiatrists' views of DSM-III-R: a survey of usage and opinions.

Authors:  S R Setterberg; M Ernst; U Rao; M Campbell; G A Carlson; D Shaffer; B M Staghezza
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  The development of the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines for Mental and Behavioural Disorders.

Authors:  Michael B First; Geoffrey M Reed; Steven E Hyman; Shekhar Saxena
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 49.548

10.  Psychologists' perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey.

Authors:  Spencer C Evans; Geoffrey M Reed; Michael C Roberts; Patricia Esparza; Ann D Watts; João Mendonça Correia; Pierre Ritchie; Mario Maj; Shekhar Saxena
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10
View more
  17 in total

1.  Clinical utility of ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for high-burden mental disorders: results from mental health settings in 13 countries.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Reed; Jared W Keeley; Tahilia J Rebello; Michael B First; Oye Gureje; José Luis Ayuso-Mateos; Shigenobu Kanba; Brigitte Khoury; Cary S Kogan; Valery N Krasnov; Mario Maj; Jair de Jesus Mari; Pratap Sharan; Dan J Stein; Min Zhao; Tsuyoshi Akiyama; Howard F Andrews; Elson Asevedo; Majda Cheour; Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez; Joseph El-Khoury; Andrea Fiorillo; Jean Grenier; Nitin Gupta; Lola Kola; Maya Kulygina; Itziar Leal-Leturia; Mario Luciano; Bulumko Lusu; J Nicolás I Martínez-López; Chihiro Matsumoto; Mayokun Odunleye; Lucky Umukoro Onofa; Sabrina Paterniti; Shivani Purnima; Rebeca Robles; Manoj K Sahu; Goodman Sibeko; Na Zhong; Wolfgang Gaebel; Anne M Lovell; Toshimasa Maruta; Kathleen M Pike; Michael C Roberts; María Elena Medina-Mora
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  The ICD-11 has been adopted by the World Health Assembly.

Authors:  Benedetta Pocai
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Accuracy of diagnostic classification and clinical utility assessment of ICD-11 compared to ICD-10 in 10 mental disorders: findings from a web-based field study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaebel; Johannes Stricker; Mathias Riesbeck; Jürgen Zielasek; Ariane Kerst; Eva Meisenzahl-Lechner; Volker Köllner; Matthias Rose; Tobias Hofmann; Ingo Schäfer; Annett Lotzin; Peer Briken; Verena Klein; Franziska Brunner; Jared W Keeley; Julia Brechbiel; Tahilia J Rebello; Howard F Andrews; Geoffrey M Reed; Ulrich Vogel; Alkomiet Hasan; Peter Falkai
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5.

Authors:  Michael B First; Wolfgang Gaebel; Mario Maj; Dan J Stein; Cary S Kogan; John B Saunders; Vladimir B Poznyak; Oye Gureje; Roberto Lewis-Fernández; Andreas Maercker; Chris R Brewin; Marylene Cloitre; Angelica Claudino; Kathleen M Pike; Gillian Baird; David Skuse; Richard B Krueger; Peer Briken; Jeffrey D Burke; John E Lochman; Spencer C Evans; Douglas W Woods; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Stratification of adolescents across mental phenomena emphasizes the importance of transdiagnostic distress: a replication in two general population cohorts.

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Hannah Jones; Emma Soneson; Adam P Wagner; Golam M Khandaker; Stanley Zammit; Jon Heron; Gemma Hammerton; Edward T Bullmore; Ray Dolan; Peter Fonagy; Ian M Goodyer; J Perez; Peter B Jones
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  Transdiagnostic psychiatry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Marco Solmi; Natascia Brondino; Cathy Davies; Chungil Chae; Pierluigi Politi; Stefan Borgwardt; Stephen M Lawrie; Josef Parnas; Philip McGuire
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

7.  Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Reed; Michael B First; Cary S Kogan; Steven E Hyman; Oye Gureje; Wolfgang Gaebel; Mario Maj; Dan J Stein; Andreas Maercker; Peter Tyrer; Angelica Claudino; Elena Garralda; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Rajat Ray; John B Saunders; Tarun Dua; Vladimir Poznyak; María Elena Medina-Mora; Kathleen M Pike; José L Ayuso-Mateos; Shigenobu Kanba; Jared W Keeley; Brigitte Khoury; Valery N Krasnov; Maya Kulygina; Anne M Lovell; Jair de Jesus Mari; Toshimasa Maruta; Chihiro Matsumoto; Tahilia J Rebello; Michael C Roberts; Rebeca Robles; Pratap Sharan; Min Zhao; Assen Jablensky; Pichet Udomratn; Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar; Per-Anders Rydelius; Sabine Bährer-Kohler; Ann D Watts; Shekhar Saxena
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 49.548

8.  Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

Authors:  Roman Kotov; Katherine G Jonas; William T Carpenter; Michael N Dretsch; Nicholas R Eaton; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Kelsey Hobbs; Ulrich Reininghaus; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Monika A Waszczuk; Thomas A Widiger; Aidan G C Wright; David H Zald; Robert F Krueger; David Watson
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 49.548

9.  A new conception and subsequent taxonomy of clinical psychological problems.

Authors:  Gary M Bakker
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2019-07-10

10.  Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Christoph U Correll; Celso Arango; Michael Berk; Vikram Patel; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 79.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.