Literature DB >> 29855877

An exploratory study of energy reserves and biometry as potential tools for assessing the effects of pest management strategies on the earwig, Forficula auricularia L.

Séverine Suchail1, Adrien Le Navenant2,3, Yvan Capowiez4, Alain Thiéry2, Magali Rault2.   

Abstract

Apple orchards are heavily treated crops and some sprayed insecticides are recognized to have toxic effects on non-target arthropods. Earwigs are important natural enemies in pip-fruit orchards and contribute to the biological control of aphids. In addition, due to their ease of capture and identification, they are an interesting potential bioindicator of the possible detrimental effects of different orchard management strategies. In this study, we measured the energy reserves and some morphological traits of Forficula auricularia L. sampled in apple orchards under management strategies (organic versus integrated pest management (IPM)). We observed a significant decrease in mass (22 to 27%), inter-eye width (3%), and prothorax width (2 to 5%) in earwigs from IPM compared to organic orchards. Energy body reserves also confirmed these results with a significant decrease of 48% in glycogen and 25 to 42% in lipid content in earwigs from IPM compared to organic orchards. However, the protein content was approximately 70% higher in earwigs from IPM than in organic orchards. Earwigs sampled in IPM orchards may adapt to minimize the adverse toxic effects of pesticide treatments using a large number of strategies, which are reflected in changes to their energy reserves. These strategies could, in turn, influence the population dynamics of natural enemies and impair their role in the biological control of pests in apple orchards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biometry; Earwig; Energy reserves; Glycogen; Lipid; Pest management strategy; Protein

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29855877     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2371-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  31 in total

Review 1.  The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods.

Authors:  Nicolas Desneux; Axel Decourtye; Jean-Marie Delpuech
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 2.  Physiological costs of combating chemical toxicants: ecological implications.

Authors:  P Calow
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Meeting the energetic demands of insect diapause: nutrient storage and utilization.

Authors:  Daniel A Hahn; David L Denlinger
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples.

Authors:  M A Markwell; S M Haas; L L Bieber; N E Tolbert
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Biomarkers and energy reserves in the isopod Porcellionides pruinosus: the effects of long-term exposure to dimethoate.

Authors:  Nuno G C Ferreira; Rui Morgado; Miguel J G Santos; Amadeu M V M Soares; Susana Loureiro
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Improved determination of total serum lipids by the sulfo-phospho-vanillin reaction.

Authors:  C S Frings; T W Fendley; R T Dunn; C A Queen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Impact of agrochemicals on non-target species: Calathus fuscipes Goeze 1777 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as model.

Authors:  Anita Giglio; Francesco Cavaliere; Piero Giulio Giulianini; Antonio Mazzei; Federica Talarico; Maria Luigia Vommaro; Pietro Brandmayr
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Swimming impairment and acetylcholinesterase inhibition in zebrafish exposed to copper or chlorpyrifos separately, or as mixtures.

Authors:  Fred A Tilton; Theo K Bammler; Evan P Gallagher
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.228

9.  [A prospective research on the hedgerow's 'source' function].

Authors:  Jean-François Debras; Audrey Dussaud; René Rieux; Thierry Dutoit
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 1.583

Review 10.  Lipid uptake by insect oocytes.

Authors:  Rolf Ziegler; Rik Van Antwerpen
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 4.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.