Luke Forde1, Niamh McGrath2, Deirdre Devaney3, Sami Awadalla4, Ciara M McDonnell2, Nuala P Murphy2,5. 1. Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland. lucforde@gmail.com. 2. Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland. 3. Department of Histopathology, Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland. 4. Department of Surgery, Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland. 5. UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coeliac disease (CD) is more common in those with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and may be asymptomatic despite the presence of intestinal histological changes. Optimal screening practice guidelines differ internationally. We undertook a retrospective audit to determine the efficacy of current screening practice for CD in T1DM in our centre. METHODS: All children and adolescents < 16 years, diagnosed with T1DM in our service and continuing to attend the service in January 2017 were included. Data on CD screening was collected and compared to current NICE, NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients attending our service, 253 attended from T1DM diagnosis and all had CD screening performed in our centre. In 37 of 253 patients, IgA-TTG was positive, providing a cumulative prevalence of 14.6%. Of these, 31(83.78%) with an elevated TTG on screening had no recorded gastrointestinal symptoms or CD-related clinical signs. Of the 35 TTG plus EMA-positive patients, 22/35 (59.46%) had diagnostic endoscopic biopsy. Nineteen (83.4%) had CD confirmed, 1 (4.54%) had negative biopsy and 2 (9%) had equivocal, non-diagnostic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Timely diagnosis of CD can prevent chronic ill health in affected individuals, and in patients with T1DM, CD is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality. Given the high prevalence of atypical symptoms and silent CD in those with T1DM, in this and other studies, and the benefits of detection and treatment of CD, screening is essential. Large-scale data collection allowing for the development of evidence-based guidelines is required.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coeliac disease (CD) is more common in those with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and may be asymptomatic despite the presence of intestinal histological changes. Optimal screening practice guidelines differ internationally. We undertook a retrospective audit to determine the efficacy of current screening practice for CD in T1DM in our centre. METHODS: All children and adolescents < 16 years, diagnosed with T1DM in our service and continuing to attend the service in January 2017 were included. Data on CD screening was collected and compared to current NICE, NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients attending our service, 253 attended from T1DM diagnosis and all had CD screening performed in our centre. In 37 of 253 patients, IgA-TTG was positive, providing a cumulative prevalence of 14.6%. Of these, 31(83.78%) with an elevated TTG on screening had no recorded gastrointestinal symptoms or CD-related clinical signs. Of the 35 TTG plus EMA-positive patients, 22/35 (59.46%) had diagnostic endoscopic biopsy. Nineteen (83.4%) had CD confirmed, 1 (4.54%) had negative biopsy and 2 (9%) had equivocal, non-diagnostic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Timely diagnosis of CD can prevent chronic ill health in affected individuals, and in patients with T1DM, CD is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality. Given the high prevalence of atypical symptoms and silent CD in those with T1DM, in this and other studies, and the benefits of detection and treatment of CD, screening is essential. Large-scale data collection allowing for the development of evidence-based guidelines is required.
Entities:
Keywords:
Coeliac disease; Coeliac disease screening; Paediatric type one diabetes mellitus
Authors: S Husby; S Koletzko; I R Korponay-Szabó; M L Mearin; A Phillips; R Shamir; R Troncone; K Giersiepen; D Branski; C Catassi; M Lelgeman; M Mäki; C Ribes-Koninckx; A Ventura; K P Zimmer Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: C G Csizmadia; M L Mearin; A Oren; A Kromhout; J B Crusius; B M von Blomberg; A S Peña; M N Wiggers; J P Vandenbroucke Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: A Mohn; M Cerruto; D Iafusco; F Prisco; S Tumini; O Stoppoloni; F Chiarelli Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Ivor D Hill; Martha H Dirks; Gregory S Liptak; Richard B Colletti; Alessio Fasano; Stefano Guandalini; Edward J Hoffenberg; Karoly Horvath; Joseph A Murray; Mitchell Pivor; Ernest G Seidman Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Jill H Simmons; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Kim McFann; Marian Rewers; Jennifer Taylor; Lisa M Emery; Iman Taki; Sharon Vanyi; Edwin Liu; Edward J Hoffenberg Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.406