| Literature DB >> 29855538 |
Hyunsoo Lee1, Il-Suek Koh2, Yongjune Kim3, Yongshik Lee4.
Abstract
A ground-plane cloak is designed based on the quasi-conformal mapping method to hide a perfectly conducting object. It is fabricated with a metamaterial, a mixture of a dielectric and air. Using the dielectric mixing formula, the required volume fraction is calculated for a designed refractive index of the cloak. To guarantee the statistical isotropy of the cloak structure, many small pixels are randomly connected to form the metamaterial. A three-dimensional printing machine is used to implement the whole designed cloak structure. The performance of the cloak is experimentally analyzed over a wide frequency range for both independent polarizations. The measurement is also validated by numerical full-wave simulations. Because the quasi-conformal mapping generates unrealistic refractive indices, less than unity, those are removed. The effect of the truncation is experimentally observed and theoretically analyzed by the ray-tracing method.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29855538 PMCID: PMC5981643 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26849-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Continuous refractive index profile of 2D ground-plane cloak, wherein the designed profile includes refractive index less than unity. The refractive index greater than unity is truncated in (b). (c) One sample layer of the meta-cell whose volume fraction is uniformly 0.314 and the corresponding refractive index is 1.174. (d) Discretized refractive index profile of the 2D ground-plane cloak. Each unit cell will be realized by using the meta-cell in (c). (e) CAD model of one planar layer for 3D ground-plane cloak. (f) CAD model of the full 3D ground-plane cloak. It consists of 90 layers of random patterns in (e). (g) Fabricated 3D ground-plane cloak by using 3D printer.
Figure 2(a) 2D scattering simulation for v-polarized plane wave with incident angle 45° by rectangular cylinder whose cross section is one of the 90 layers in Fig. 1(f). (b) The same simulation with continuously varying inhomogeneous cross section. (c) Measurement setup of bistatic scattering for cloak experiment. The cloak is supported by a Styrofoam podium. Incident angle is set to 100°, and both polarizations are used.
Figure 3Normalized powers of scatterings as a function of observation angle. The incident angle is set to 100°. Scatterings for h-polarized incident wave at 8.5 GHz (a–c), 9 GHz (d–f), 10 GHz (g–i), and 11.5 GHz (j–l) frequencies are compared. Each column corresponds to scattering for h-polarization by ground plane (a,d,g,j), triangular bump on the plane (b,e,h,k), and cloak covering the bump (c,f,i,l), from the left to right. Scatterings for v-polarized incident wave at 8.5 GHz (m–o), 9 GHz (p–r), 10 GHz (s–u), and 11.5 GHz (v–x) frequencies are compared. Each column corresponds to scattering for v-polarization by ground plane (m,p,s,v), triangular bump on the plane (n,q,t,w), and cloak covering the bump (o,r,u,x), from the left to right. Especially, the normalized powers of scatterings at 10 GHz are compared with HFSS simulation for (y) h-polarization and (z) v-polarization.
Figure 4Measured scatterings for wider frequency range from 5 to 15 GHz. Scattering with -polarization by (a) ground plane, (b) triangular bump on the plane, and (c) cloak covering the bump are compared. Scattering with v-polarization by (d) ground plane, (e) triangular bump on the plane, and (f) cloak covering the bump are also compared. Especially, the measured scatterings by cloak for truncated frequency range from 8.5 to 11.5 GHz with (g) h-polarization and (h) v-polarization are illustrated.
Figure 5Comparison of velocities of two rays propagating inside cloak medium with (a) originally designed refractive index profile and (b) truncated profile. The refractive index outside the cloak depicted in (a,b) is almost 1. (c) Phase differences between ray 1 and ray 2 for the complete (original) and truncated profiles. (d) Estimated power variation by two-ray model in specular direction compared with measurement results for both polarizations
Figure 6Comparison of normalized received powers between measurement and simulation result at 5 GHz for (a) h-polarization and (b) v-polarization.
Figure 7Ratios of normalized scattered power with and without cloak structure for two polarizations at specular direction at 10 GHz.