| Literature DB >> 29855487 |
Prosenjit Ghosh1,2, K Prasanna3,4, Yogaraj Banerjee3, Ian S Williams5, Michael K Gagan5,6, Atanu Chaudhuri7, Satyam Suwas7.
Abstract
The Cretaceous greenhouse climate was accompanied by major changes in Earth's hydrological cycle, but seasonally resolved hydroclimatic reconstructions for this anomalously warm period are rare. We measured the δ18O and CO2 clumped isotope Δ47 of the seasonal growth bands in carbonate shells of the mollusc Villorita cyprinoides (Black Clam) growing in the Cochin estuary, in southern India. These tandem records accurately reconstruct seasonal changes in sea surface temperature (SST) and seawater δ18O, allowing us to document freshwater discharge into the estuary, and make inferences about rainfall amount. The same analytical approach was applied to well-preserved fossil remains of the Cretaceous (Early Maastrichtian) mollusc Phygraea (Phygraea) vesicularis from the nearby Kallankuruchchi Formation in the Cauvery Basin of southern India. The palaeoenvironmental record shows that, unlike present-day India, where summer rainfall predominates, most rainfall in Cretaceous India occurred in winter. During the Early Maastrichtian, the Indian plate was positioned at ~30°S latitude, where present-day rainfall and storm activity is also concentrated in winter. The good match of the Cretaceous climate and present-day climate at ~30°S suggests that the large-scale atmospheric circulation and seasonal hydroclimate patterns were similar to, although probably more intense than, those at present.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29855487 PMCID: PMC5981374 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26272-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Location of the study areas. (A) Map of India showing the location of the modern Cochin estuary (yellow star) and Late Cretaceous Cauvery Basin (red star). (B) Geological map of the Cauvery Basin showing the sampling location and lithostratigraphy of the Late Cretaceous succession. Maps were drawn using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite (2017) Education License, Graphic design software, https://www.coreldraw.com/.
Figure 2δ18O in V. cyprinoides, reconstructed temperatures and instrumental records for the Cochin estuary. (A) Temperature estimates (red circles) derived from clumped isotope thermometry (CDES scale) compared with observed temperatures[45] (grey shading denotes amplitude of signal). δ18O values for V. cyprinoides measured by continuous flow IRMS at 1 mm resolution (grey squares) are also plotted. Slower shell growth during cooler periods reduced the temporal resolution for the temperature estimates. (B) Observed daily rainfall (grey bars, http://www.tutiempo.net/) compared with the reconstructed percentage contribution of freshwater to the Cochin estuary (blue squares) and cumulative river discharge (purple diamonds, discussed in detail in Section S4 of the Suppl. Information 1). The freshwater contribution was calculated by subtracting the influence of temperature from the shell δ18O record, and applying a mixing model with end-member δ18O values for freshwater and seawater (green circles denote calculated δ18O water) (see text for details).
δ13C and δ18O values for V. cyprinoides shell growth bands and calculated δ18O of water reconstructed using observed monthly water temperature[45].
| Sample number | Assigned date | δ18O shell (‰VPDB) | δ13C shell (‰ VPDB) | δ18O water (‰ VSMOW) | Measured+temperature (°C) | Calculated*temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dec-09 | −3.87 | −7.30 | −1.58 | 30.1 | 29.55 |
| 2 | Oct-09 | −3.97 | −8.91 | −2.36 | 31.0 | 26.56 |
| 3 | Sep-09 | −4.31 | −10.00 | −2.01 | 29.4 | 29.59 |
| 4 | Aug-09 | −3.60 | −9.38 | −2.50 | 27.8 | 24.28 |
| 5 | Jun-09 | −2.54 | −7.20 | −3.46 | 29.4 | 15.33 |
| 6 | May-09 | −2.32 | −6.20 | −0.87 | 31.7 | 25.85 |
| 7 | Mar-09 | −2.66 | −6.36 | −0.58 | 30.5 | 28.62 |
| 8 | Feb-09 | −3.40 | −7.20 | −0.36 | 29.9 | 32.89 |
| 9 | Dec-08 | −4.18 | −7.38 | −1.58 | 30.1 | 30.92 |
| 10 | Nov-08 | −4.36 | −8.40 | −1.19 | 29.9 | 33.45 |
| 11 | Sep-08 | −4.29 | −8.68 | −2.01 | 29.4 | 29.50 |
| 12 | Aug-08 | −4.48 | −10.09 | −2.50 | 27.8 | 28.18 |
| 13 | Jun-08 | −4.23 | −9.29 | −3.46 | 29.4 | 22.82 |
| 14 | May-08 | −3.42 | −8.04 | −0.87 | 31.7 | 30.72 |
| 15 | Apr-08 | −3.95 | −7.25 | −0.75 | 31.0 | 33.58 |
| 16 | Feb-08 | −4.07 | −6.17 | −0.36 | 29.9 | 35.86 |
| 17 | Jan-08 | −3.30 | −5.86 | −1.10 | 27.1 | 29.17 |
| 18 | Nov-07 | −2.94 | −5.68 | −1.19 | 29.9 | 27.16 |
| 19 | Oct-07 | −3.67 | −5.94 | −2.36 | 31.0 | 25.23 |
| 20 | Aug-07 | −3.89 | −6.46 | −2.50 | 27.8 | 25.56 |
+Geetha et al., 2010 (ref.[45]).
*Grossman and Ku, 1986 (ref.[41]) modified by Dettman et al.,1999 (ref.[12]).
Temperature and freshwater contribution to the Cochin estuary reconstructed using clumped isotope ratios and δ18O in seasonal growth bands of V. cyprinoides.
| Sample ID | δ13C (‰,VPDB) | δ18O (‰,VPDB) | Δ47 | Calculated temperature (°C)# | *δ18O water (‰,VSMOW) | Freshwater (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESC1 | −8.22 | −4.34 | 0.69 | 29.6 | −0.55 | 35 |
| ESC2 | −6.84 | −3.49 | 0.69 | 30.1 | 0.41 | 13 |
| ESC3 | −5.84 | −3.28 | 0.69 | 30.5 | 0.69 | 7 |
| ESC4 | −5.96 | −3.46 | 0.70 | 26.7 | −0.24 | 28 |
| ESC5 | −7.56 | −4.41 | 0.68 | 31.9 | −0.18 | 27 |
| ESC6 | −7.21 | −3.93 | 0.71 | 24.8 | −1.08 | 47 |
| ESC7 | −6.30 | −3.87 | 0.68 | 32.5 | 0.50 | 11 |
| ESC8 | −5.49 | −3.59 | 0.69 | 28.9 | 0.07 | 21 |
| ESC9 | −5.04 | −3.39 | 0.73 | 20.4 | −1.45 | 56 |
| ESC10 | −5.00 | −3.47 | 0.69 | 30.0 | 0.40 | 14 |
| ESC11 | −7.07 | −4.52 | 0.72 | 23.5 | −1.94 | 67 |
#Dennis et al., 2011(ref.[22]).
*Grossman and Ku, 1986 (ref.[41]) modified by Dettman et al., 1999 (ref.[12]).
Figure 3Reconstructed Early Maastrichtian temperature and seawater δ18O for the Cauvery Basin. (A) δ18O of Phygraea vesicularis shell 1 measured by dual inlet IRMS (squares) and shell 2 (diamonds) measured by continuous flow IRMS (1 mm resolution). Shell 2 was also analysed by SHRIMP with a 25 µm spot size and 150 µm spacing (circles). (B) Seasonal temperatures for shell 1 reconstructed using clumped isotope thermometry (CDES scale). (C) Calculated δ18O of water using IRMS shell δ18Odata in (A, B) and the empirical δ18O-temperature relationship for molluscan calcite of Dettman et al., 1999 (ref.[12]). Tan shading indicates cooler/wetter winter seasons.
Early Maastrichtian temperatures and freshwater inputs for the Cauvery Basin of southern India reconstructed using clumped isotope and δ18O analyses of seasonal growth bands in P. vesicularis.
| Sample ID | Distance (mm) | δ13C (‰,VPDB) | δ18O (‰,VPDB) | Δ47 (Absolute Scale) | Calculated temperature (°C)# | δ18O* (‰,VSMOW) | Freshwater (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRE A1 | 4 | 0.41 | −1.62 | 0.71 | 24 | 1.6 | 17 |
| CRE A2 | 6 | 0.61 | −2.96 | 0.66 | 37 | 1.7 | 4 |
| CRE A3 | 11 | 1.98 | −2.15 | 0.67 | 34 | 1.6 | 1 |
| CRE A4 | 12 | 1.12 | −2.54 | 0.70 | 27 | −0.5 | 22 |
| CRE A5 | 14 | 1.07 | −2.10 | 0.73 | 21 | 0.2 | 31 |
| CRE A6 | 15 | 2.35 | −1.79 | 0.69 | 30 | 1.9 | 5 |
| CRE A7 | 16 | 1.66 | −2.58 | 0.67 | 35 | 1.7 | 3 |
| CRE A8 | 17 | 3.54 | −3.12 | 0.66 | 37 | 0.7 | 5 |
#Dennis et al., 2011 (ref.[22]).
*Kim and O’Neil, 1997 (ref.[42]).