Literature DB >> 29855069

Comparison of device-supported sensorimotor training and splint intervention for myofascial temporomandibular disorder pain patients.

N N Giannakopoulos1, A-K Rauer2, D Hellmann1, S Hugger3, M Schmitter1, A Hugger2.   

Abstract

This study was to compare the short-term therapeutic efficacy of device-supported sensorimotor training with that of standard splint therapy for patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain over a treatment period of 3 months. We tested the hypothesis that both types of intervention are equally effective for pain reduction. In addition, the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the temporal and masseter muscles was recorded under conditions of force-controlled submaximum and maximum biting in intercuspation. Of consecutive patients seeking treatment for non-odontogenic oro-facial pain, 45 patients with myofascial TMD pain (graded chronic pain status, GCPS, I and II) were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups (sensorimotor training and conventional splint treatment). Patients were evaluated 4 times (initial examination, 2, 6 and 12 weeks later) by use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). Electromyographic activity was recorded at the initial session and after 3 months. Ease-of-use of the treatment options was also evaluated. Significant (P < .0001) pain reduction (sensorimotor training 53%, splint therapy 40%) was achieved for both groups, with no significant differences (P > .05) between the groups. Force-controlled sub-maximum normalized electromyographic activity was significantly different between T0 and T3 for group A (sensorimotor training, P < .05) but was not significantly different for group B (splint, P > .05). For normalized maximum-biting EMG activity in intercuspation, however, a significant increase in EMG activity was observed for group A for the masseter and temporal muscles (P < .001) and for group B for the masseter muscle only (P < .001). Moreover, sensorimotor training was significantly (P < .05) less easy to use than the splint. The results of this study confirm the pain-reducing effect of sensorimotor training for patients with myofascial TMD pain (GCPS I and II). This innovative active treatment might be a promising option for TMD pain patients.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electromyography; home-exercise therapy; occlusal splint; sensorimotor training; temporomandibular disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29855069     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  No evidence on the effectiveness of oral splints for the management of temporomandibular joint dysfunction pain in both short and long-term follow-up systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies.

Authors:  Atef Abdel Hameed Fouda
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Influence of Controlled Stomatognathic Motor Activity on Sway, Control and Stability of the Center of Mass During Dynamic Steady-State Balance-An Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis.

Authors:  Cagla Fadillioglu; Lisa Kanus; Felix Möhler; Steffen Ringhof; Daniel Hellmann; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Changes in Maximum Mandibular Mobility Due to Splint Therapy in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  Bernhard Wiechens; Svea Paschereit; Tristan Hampe; Torsten Wassmann; Nikolaus Gersdorff; Ralf Bürgers
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Prognostic factor analysis in patients with temporomandibular disorders after reversible treatment: study protocol for a prospective cohort study in China.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Wentao Shi; Shenji Lu; Bin Cai; Shuai Fan; Yang Yang; Lili Xu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Signal acquisition and analysis of ambulatory electromyographic recordings for the assessment of sleep bruxism: A scoping review.

Authors:  Magdalini Thymi; Frank Lobbezoo; Ghizlane Aarab; Jari Ahlberg; Kazuyoshi Baba; Maria Clotilde Carra; Luigi M Gallo; Antoon De Laat; Daniele Manfredini; Gilles Lavigne; Peter Svensson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.