Literature DB >> 29854883

Factors Affecting Dental Caries of Preschool Children in Shiraz, 2014.

Soheila Shaghaghian1, Masoud Abolvardi2, Marzieh Akhlaghian3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Dental caries, the most common infectious disease, can lead to several consequences, including inflammation and bleeding of the gum, abscess formation, tooth loss, and subsequently loss of available space in the arch.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine dental caries status of Shiraz preschool children and its related factors. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the children registered in Shiraz kindergartens in 2014. The study recruited 453 children by randomized cluster sampling. We evaluated the children's demographic and oral hygiene factors, and their dental caries status using decayed, missed, and filled tooth (dmft) index and prevalence of the children with untreated dental caries. Relationship between the children's characteristics and their dental caries status was evaluated.
RESULTS: Only 119 children (30.1%) were caries-free. The children's mean dmft index was 3.88(±3.9). After controlling the effect of confounding factors, the children's dental caries status was significantly associated with variables indicating their socioeconomic status such as fathers' job, mothers' education, and number of children in the family. Furthermore, there was a significant association between the children's dental caries status and their oral hygiene habits such as frequency of tooth brushing.
CONCLUSION: The dental caries status of the studied preschool children was not desirable which could be indicative of the inadequacy of the current preventive programs. To improve this issue, interventional preventive programs such as tooth brushing are recommended. The programs are more necessary for the children of low socioeconomic families and those with poor oral hygiene habits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oral hygiene ; Socioeconomic factors; Dental caries

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854883      PMCID: PMC5960729     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)        ISSN: 2345-6418


Introduction

Dental caries, also known as tooth decay, is a progressive and irreversible degradation of the enamel and/or dentin because of acid production caused by bacterial metabolism.[1] It is the most common infectious disease that affects human beings. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, approximately 2.43 billion people (36% of the population) have active dental caries. In addition, nearly all adults have dental caries at some point in their life span.[2] Dental caries is prevalent in children, as well.2 WHO has reported that 9% of children worldwide (620 million) have had dental caries.[2] Children's dental caries can cause inflammation and bleeding of the gum,[3] abscess formation,[4] tooth loss, and subsequently loss of available space in the arch.[1,3] It can also affect many aspects of children's life. For example, it can lead to oral malodor and social problems.[5] Furthermore, because it is an infectious source in the body, it can exacerbate some cardiac problems.[6] There are several indices to evaluate dental caries; “decayed, missed, and filled teeth (dmft) index” and “prevalence of untreated dental caries” are two of the most famous ones. The dmft index, which shows the overall status of dentition, is calculated by summation of missed, decayed, and filled teeth and is determined by clinical examination. This index, which is one of the main indices in dentistry, has been used for more than 70 years in dental epidemiology.[7] Prevalence of untreated dental caries determines the percentage of people with at least one decayed tooth. To implement health promotion programs for improving oral health status of children, authorities need to know not only the extent of oral problems but also their related factors. Several studies have shown the factors contributing to children's dental caries. They have revealed several etiological factors for dental caries such as oral cavity quantitative and qualitative bacterial components;[8] overall oral health status[8] including the frequency and efficacy of plaque removal;[9-10] the amount and frequency of sugar consumption;[11-12] and the amount and components of saliva.[13] In addition, there are several studies that have reported the relationship between oral health and some demographic and socioeconomic factors. The studies have shown that children's dental caries is related to their age[14] and sex,[15-16] level of parents’ education,[17] and the family income.[18] However, there is some controversy in the results of the studies. Although Pakpour et al.[18] have shown the relationship between children's oral health status and their age, sex, and the family income in Qazvin, Iran, Asghari et al.[19] have concluded that there is not any association between socio-economic backgrounds and dental health in Isfahan, Iran. The differences may be explained by the fact that people who live in different places have different cultures and behaviors as Riordan et al.[17] have reported that cultural status and family beliefs are correlated with the prevalence of dental caries. In addition, they found that different social groups required different strategies for changing children’s oral hygiene habits.[17] Therefore, to design strategies for improving oral health in children of different places with different cultures, authorities require the exact status of children's dental caries and its related factors in that specific place. Although Shiraz is one of the largest cities in Iran, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have evaluated all of the important factors that can affect children's oral health in Shiraz. Because dental caries is a prevalent disease with several catastrophic outcomes, particularly in children, health promotion programs in this regard are necessary to be held. To implement the programs, authorities need to know the status of the problem and its related factors in Shiraz. Therefore, this study was designed to determine the dental caries status of preschool children and its related factors in Shiraz.

Materials and Method

The target population of this cross-sectional study was 3-6-year-old children who were registered in Shiraz kindergartens in 2014. The Research Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol. Sample size was calculated based on the prevalence of the children with untreated dental caries in the pilot study conducted on 30 children. Using type I error of 0.05, sampling error of 0.05, and estimated proportion of 0.5, it was determined that at least 385 children should participate in the study. The children were selected by a randomized cluster sampling. To do the sampling, we considered Shiraz kindergartens as clusters and their name and address was obtained from welfare organization. We selected 10 out of 147 Shiraz kindergartens by balloting. After explaining the objectives of the study for the children’s parents, we asked all 453 parents to let their children to participate in the study. Children whose parents consented were included in the study. However, the children who were uncooperative or absent at the examination day, or did not have any teeth were excluded. One calibrated senior dental student performed the children’s dental examinations in the kindergartens using a community periodontal indexing (CPI) probe,[20] a disposable dental mirror, and a headlight. Children’s dmft index and untreated dental caries were evaluated and recorded according to WHO criteria. Both oral and dental conditions of the children were examined in a systematic manner to reduce the risk of any probable missed areas. Each tooth was carefully examined using a standard headlight. However, according to WHO guidelines, neither radiograph nor fiber optic was used. The teeth were evaluated for any sign of touchable defects by a 0.5 round non-penetrating CPI probe[20] and scored according to WHO guideline.[20] To determine each child’s dmft index, summation of his/her decayed, missed, and filled teeth was calculated. By interviewing with the parents, the dental student also recorded the children’s demographic variables (8 items), their oral hygiene habits (3 items), and the parents’ perception of their children’s oral health status (2 items) in a checklist. To consider ethical issues, all children’s personal data were confidential and the children’s names were not recorded in the checklists. Furthermore, the collected data were not available to anybody, except the researchers. The collected data were entered into the SPSS version 18 to determine the mean of the children’s dmft index and the prevalence of the children with untreated dental caries. One- way ANOVA (with Tukey post hoc test), Pearson Chi-square, and independent sample t test were used to estimate the relationship between demographic data, oral hygiene variables, and dental caries status of children. To control the effect of possible confounding factors, all variables were entered into multiple logistic regression models with the data obtained by children with untreated dental caries as dependent variable and multiple linear regression models with the children’s dmft index as dependent variable. An alpha level of 0.05 was considered as statistical significance.

Results

Most parents (N=396) invited to the study consented to participate (response rate=87%). Although more than half of the mothers (236 mothers) had university degrees, more than two-thirds of them (289) were homemakers. The mean age of the participants' children was 60.6 (±8.9) months with almost equal male/female ratio. Tooth brushing for 71.2% of the children had been started after the age 2 years and the teeth in 24.2% had been brushed lower than once a day (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics and oral hygiene status of the studied preschool children and their relationship with the children’s dmft index (N=396)

Children’s characteristicsN(%)Children’s dmft index
Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis***
Mean±SD p Valueβ (SE) p Value
Demographic factors
Sex
Boy202 (51)3.82±3.750.737*--
Girl194 (49)3.95±4.050.06(0.35)0.855
Age
36-47 months old 49(12.4)2.85±3.34a0.012**--
48-59 months old84(21.2)3.20±3.68ab0.73(0.63)0.248
60-72 months old263(66.4)4.28±4.00b1.44(0.54)0.009
Children in family
One child162(40.9)2.92±3.32<0.001*--
More than one child234(59.1)4.54±4.131.06(0.37)0.005
Fathers’ job
Self-employed258(65.2)3.72±3.710.264*--
Employee138(34.8)4.18±4.221.01(0.42)0.017
Mothers’ employment status
Employed107(27)3.24±3.600.047*--
Homemaker289(73)4.12±3.98-0.14(0.49)0.778
Fathers’ Education
Non-university educated171(43.2)4.08±3.850.235*-0.24(0.45)0.600
University educated225(56.8)3.61±3.96--
Mothers’ Education
Non-university educated160(40.4)4.46±4.00<0.001*1.10(0.48)0.023
University educated236(59.6)3.02±3.59--
Oral hygiene
Frequency of tooth brushing
Once a day or more300 (75.8)3.50±3.640.002*--
Lower than once a day96 (24.2)5.07±4.431.22(0.42)0.004
Started age of tooth brushing
2 years old or younger114 (28.8)3.56±3.850.300*--
After 2 years old282 (71.2)4.0±3.910.48(0.40)0.230
Dental visits
No dental visits189 (47.7)2.62±3.25a<0.001**--
For check-up77 (19.4)3.35±3.72a0.60(0.50)0.227
For dental pain 130(32.8)6.02±3.98b3.07(0.40)<0.001

Note: The results of Tukey test were shown using letters. There is a statistically significant difference between groups without common letters.

dmft: decayed, missing, filling tooth

N= Number SD= Standard Deviation SE= Standard Error

Independent Sample t test

One Way ANOVA

Multiple regression analysis

Children’s dental caries status

According to our dental examination, prevalence of untreated dental caries was 69.9%. Only 119 children (30.1%) were recognized as caries-free. Of 277 children with untreated dental caries, 33 (8.2%), 43 (10.9%), and 201 (50.8%) had one, two, and more than two decayed teeth, respectively. We found filled teeth in 62 children (15.8%), of whom 26 (6.6%) and 36 (9.2%) children had one and more than one filled tooth, respectively. 58 children (14.6%) had at least one missed tooth caused by dental caries. Of them, 31 (7.8%) had 1 missed tooth and 27 (6.8%) had more than one missed teeth. The children’s dmft index varied from zero to 15 with a mean (± SD) of 3.88 (± 3.9).

Relationship between the children’s demographic factors and their dental caries status

In univariate analysis, the children’s dmft index was significantly associated with their age (p= 0.012), the number of children in family (p< 0.001), and the mothers’ employment status (p= 0.047) and education (p< 0.001). Older children had higher scores of dmft index than younger ones. In contrast, lower scores of dmft index were found in the children who were the only child of a family, or had university educated and employed mothers. Multivariate analysis showed that the scores of dmft index in the 60-72 month-old children were significantly higher than those in the 36-47 month-old children (p= 0.009). In addition, the children’s dmft index was significantly associated with the number of children in the family (p= 0.005), the mothers’ education (p= 0.023), and the fathers’ job (p= 0.017) in multivariate analysis (Table 1). Univariate analysis also showed that the existence of untreated dental caries in the children was significantly associated with their mothers’ education (p= 0.004), and the number of children in family (p= 0.003). In this analysis, untreated dental caries was found in non-single children more than single ones and more in the children with non-university educated mothers than those with university-educated mothers. Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant association between the children’s untreated dental caries and their mothers’ education (p= 0.031, Table 2).
Table 2

Relationship between children’s characteristics and their untreated dental caries (N=396)

Children’s characteristicsUntreated dental caries
Univariate analysis*Multivariate analysis**
N(%) p ValueOR p Value
Demographic factors
Sex
Boy144(71.3)0.5541.210.424
Girl133( 68.6)--
Age
36-47 months old 32(65.3)0.057--
48-59 months old51(60.7)1.020.961
60-72 months old194(73.8)1.630.178
Number of children in family
One child100(61.7)0.003--
More than one child177(75.6)1.500.104
Fathers’ job
Self-employed178(69.0)0.570--
Salaried99(71.7)1.500.196
Mothers’ employment status
Employed69(64.5)0.149--
Homemaker208(72.0)0.840.605
Fathers’ Education
Non-university educated160(71.1)0.5630.760.375
University educated117(68.4)--
Mothers’ Education
Non-university educated178(75.4)0.0042.000.031
University educated99(61.9)-
Oral hygiene
Frequency of tooth brushing
Once a day or more201(67.0)0.024--
Lower than once a day76(79.2)1.740.073
The age tooth brushing had been started
2 years old or younger75(65.8)0.251--
After 2 years old202(71.6)1.400.207
Dental visits
No dental visits109(57.7)a<0.001--
For check up54(70.1)a1.690.094
For pain and other oral problems114(87.7)b4.96<0.001

Note: The results of chi square for M proportion test were shown using letters. There is a statistically significant difference between groups without common letters.

N= Number OR: Odds Ratio

Pearson chi square test

Logistic regression analysis

Relationship between the children’s oral hygiene and their dental caries status

In univariate analysis, the mean score of dmft index in the children whose teeth had been brushed once or more was significantly lower than that in the others (p= 0.002). This relationship was also confirmed in multivariate analysis (p= 0.004). In addition, univariate and multivariate analysis showed a significant association between the children's dental visit and their dmft index (both p< 0.001). The analyses showed that the dmft index of the children who had visited a dentist because of pain or other oral problems was significantly higher than those who had not visited a dentist before or visited for check-up (p< 0.001). However, the analyses could not show a significant difference between the dmft index of the children who had not visited a dentist before and that of those who did so for check-up (p= 0.227, Table 1). Demographic characteristics and oral hygiene status of the studied preschool children and their relationship with the children’s dmft index (N=396) Note: The results of Tukey test were shown using letters. There is a statistically significant difference between groups without common letters. dmft: decayed, missing, filling tooth N= Number SD= Standard Deviation SE= Standard Error Independent Sample t test One Way ANOVA Multiple regression analysis Univariate analysis showed that the children's untreated dental caries were significantly associated with the frequency of tooth brushing (p= 0.024) and the prior dental visit (p< 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the children with a prior dental visit because of pain or other oral problems were 4.96 times more likely to have an untreated dental caries than those without a prior dental visit. However, multivariate analysis did not show a significant association between the children's untreated dental caries and the frequency of tooth brushing (Table 2). Relationship between children’s characteristics and their untreated dental caries (N=396) Note: The results of chi square for M proportion test were shown using letters. There is a statistically significant difference between groups without common letters. N= Number OR: Odds Ratio Pearson chi square test Logistic regression analysis

Discussion

This cross-sectional study assessed dental caries of Shiraz preschool children and its associated factors. Only 30% of the children were caries-free. The children's dental caries was significantly associated with their socioeconomic status, the number of children in family, frequency of their tooth brushing, and history of dental visits. More than two thirds of the children in our study had dental caries. Similarly, other studies conducted in Iran[14,21-22] and in other developing countries[11,23-24] showed a high prevalence of dental caries in children. However, the prevalence in developed countries was much lower.[25-26] Furthermore, the mean score of the dmft index in the children of our study was similar to that of most other developing countries[11,22-23] and much higher than that of developed countries.[25-27] The low prevalence of dental caries in developed countries is because of implementation of interventional programs, which should be considered in developing countries. Increased fluoride consumption were the most probable reasons for decrease in dental caries in most industrialized countries.[28] Professionally applied 5% sodium fluoride varnish shows the capability to remineralize early enamel caries in children.[29] Using Silver diamine fluoride solution at 38% is the most effective concentration in arresting active dentine caries especially by using biannually.[30] Furthermore, minimal intervention dentistry should be undertaken. It is a philosophy to keep teeth functional for life by reducing the need for cutting away healthy tooth tissues, in contrast to the traditional, surgical manner of managing dental caries with the repeat restoration cycles.[31] In our study, 24% of the children had brushed their teeth less than once a day. Furthermore, tooth brushing had been started for 71% of the children after their 2 years of age. About half of the children had not been visited by a dentist before and only 19% of them had visited for check-up. The findings could explain the reason of this high prevalence of dental caries in our children. Moreover, while 70% of our children had untreated dental caries and 15% had at least one missed tooth due to dental caries, only 15.8% of them had filled teeth. The findings may show little attention of the parents to not only preventive but also restorative needs of their children. In Iran, there are educational programs about oral health for preschool children. However, the findings indicate that such education is not adequate and the children need newer and more practical educational programs about home preventive measures especially tooth brushing. Although some studies[15-16] showed higher prevalence of dental caries in girls than in boys, our study, similar to studies conducted in Chile[9] and India,[23] did not show similar results. The difference may be because of more attention of parents to their boys’ health than that of their girls. Our finding is against any sex discrimination in our country. Our study, similar to other studies,[14,23] showed higher dmft scores in the older children. However, it did not show any differences among untreated dental caries of the children with different ages. As a child grows up, their teeth expose to cariogenic factors such as carbohydrate and bacterial plaque more; therefore, more dental caries develop. However, because of better attitude of mothers towards dental visits for older children, they are visited more and their untreated dental caries decrease consequently. [32] Furthermore, many teeth in older children may be extracted because of pulpal pain.[33] In our study, similar to Moimaz et al. study,[34] lower dental caries were detected in the lonely children. In contrast, in Jain et al. study,[35] there was not a significant relationship between the number of siblings and children’s dental caries. Fewer children in the family lead to more available time and budgets to spend for the children’s preventive and restorative dental needs. Furthermore, because of more attention of parents to single children, lower dental trauma occurs. Therefore, educational programs are more necessary for more crowded families. Our study, similar to Hoffmeister et al. study,[9] showed better dental health status in the children living in higher socioeconomic families. In contrast, Pizzo et al.[36] found higher scores of dmft index in children of employed mothers. Homemaker mothers usually spend more hours at home; as a result, they have more time for attention to their children’s oral hygiene. However, university- educated and employed mothers usually have more awareness about oral hygiene importance and pay more attention to their children’s oral health status. Furthermore, families with higher income spend more budgets on dental preventive and restorative cares. Our study, similar to other studies,[9-10] found a significant relationship between the frequency of children’s tooth brushing and their dental caries status. However, 24% of our children had brushed their teeth less than once a day. Furthermore, the high prevalence of dental caries in the children indicated non-acceptable effectiveness of tooth brushing in the others. The findings showed that our education regarding children’s oral hygiene and tooth brushing was not adequate. It highlighted the importance of establishing newer interventional programs for improving children’s tooth brushing skill. In this study, similar to other study,[37] the dental caries status of the children visited by a dentist for dental pain and problems was significantly worse than those who did not visit or visited for only check-up. However, we could not show a significant difference between the dental caries of the children with and without a previous dental check-up. Because the impact of dental check-up in decreasing dental caries have been shown,[38] our finding might indicate the improper dental check-ups. It might be supposed that not only the parents and children but also the dentists did not believe in the importance of dental check-up. Therefore, interventional programs such as designing guidelines and instructions for the dentists in this regard are recommended. To decrease dental caries of preschool children, interventional programs are recommended. To implement community-based programs such as the fluidization of drinking water, we should try to draw the authorities’ attention to the importance of oral health promotion programs. In addition, policies encouraging people, especially children, to use low-carbohydrate diet should be established using both advertisements and marketing. In addition, the use of sugar substitutes is effective in reducing total cariogenic sugar intake; therefore, sugar-free products such as sugar-free chewing gums are recommended to be used especially immediately after meals.[31] Furthermore, using tax and subset, the authorities should change the final price of various food products so that high-carbohydrate ones have higher prices. Moreover, authorities should plan regular dental check-ups freely or with a minimum charge for preschool children. In addition, office-based preventive measures such as fissure sealant and fluoride therapy are recommended to be conducted routinely for susceptible young children. Although, fluoride varnish and fissure sealants are both effective in caries reduction, many children in our country are deprived of these services due to limited funding. However, studies have shown that using fluoride varnish for children is more cost-effective and yields a greater reduction in caries for a fixed budget. [39] Therefore, we recommended fluoride varnish as well as training about proper techniques of home preventive measures such as tooth brushing for all children and their parents. This study was cross-sectional so all limitations of this type of study should be considered. Therefore, a better study type, especially a cohort study, is recommended to determine more accurately the factors affecting the dental caries status of preschool children. Furthermore, we selected the children from kindergartens. Although most of the children in Shiraz attend kindergartens, the participants might not be a true representative of the general population. For better evaluation, a community-based study is recommended.

Conclusion

We found unacceptably high prevalence of dental caries in the studied preschool children. This may show the inadequacy of the current programs for prevention of children’s dental caries. To improve, new interventional programs such as using routine fluoride varnish in combination with minimal intervention dentistry are recommended for all children. The programs are more necessary for the children living in low socioeconomic families with more than one child as well as those with poor oral health. In addition, dentists need more education about dental check-up and preventive procedures with minimal interventions to use for more children and result in a greater reduction in children dental caries.
  36 in total

1.  Caries experience of some countries and areas expressed by the Significant Caries Index.

Authors:  Makiko Nishi; Jayanthi Stjernswärd; Peter Carlsson; Douglas Bratthall
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.383

2.  Oral health in Iran.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Pakshir
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Factors associated with early childhood caries in Chile.

Authors:  Lorena Hoffmeister; Patricia Moya; Carolina Vidal; Dafna Benadof
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.139

Review 4.  Human oral microbial ecology and dental caries and periodontal diseases.

Authors:  W F Liljemark; C Bloomquist
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1996

5.  Evaluation of an interdisciplinary preventive programme for early childhood caries: findings of a regional German birth cohort study.

Authors:  Yvonne Wagner; Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  The impact of gender on caries prevalence and risk assessment.

Authors:  Esperanza Angeles Martinez-Mier; Andrea Ferreira Zandona
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04

7.  Social and Behavioral Determinants for Early Childhood Caries among Preschool Children in India.

Authors:  Mitali Jain; Ritu Namdev; Meenakshi Bodh; Samir Dutta; Parul Singhal; Arun Kumar
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-06-10

8.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohsen Naghavi; Rafael Lozano; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Richard Franklin; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jixiang Ma; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Social aspects of dental caries in the context of mother-child pairs.

Authors:  Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz; Cristina Berger Fadel; Luiz Fernando Lolli; Cléa Adas Saliba Garbin; Artênio José Ísper Garbin; Nemre Adas Saliba
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 10.  Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a systematic review.

Authors:  Sherry Shiqian Gao; Shinan Zhang; May Lei Mei; Edward Chin-Man Lo; Chun-Hung Chu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dental Caries Status and its Related Factors in Iran: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Soltani; Mahsa Sayadizadeh; Sajad Raeisi Estabragh; Kiana Ghannadan; Mahsa Malek-Mohammadi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2020-09

2.  Association of BMI, Diet, Physical Activity, and Oral Hygiene Practices with DMFT Index of Male Dental Students at King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa.

Authors:  Rizwan Jouhar; Muhammad Adeel Ahmed; Zohaib Khurshid; Syed Akhtar Hussain Bokhari
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Determinants of dental caries in children in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review based on literature published from 2000 to 2019.

Authors:  Amal Elamin; Malin Garemo; Anzelle Mulder
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Relationship of BMI with the diet, physical activity and oral hygiene practices amongst the dental students.

Authors:  Beenish Fatima Alam; Nabeela Abbasi; Talib Hussain; Malik Arshman Khan; Muhammad Aamir Ghafoor Chaudhary; Faiza Ijaz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Prevalence of Dental Caries in Children in Mymensingh and Its Associated Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sharmin Sultana; Mst Sonia Parvin; Md Taohidul Islam; Emdadul Haque Chowdhury; A S Mahfuzul Bari
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20

6.  Tooth-Level Analysis of Dental Caries in Primary Dentition in Myanmar Children.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nomura; Ryoko Otsuka; Wit Yee Wint; Ayako Okada; Ryo Hasegawa; Nobuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.