Literature DB >> 29854875

Selective targeting of p53 gain-of-function mutants in cancer.

Achuth Padmanabhan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  USP15; cancer; mutant p53; p53; personalized therapeutics

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854875      PMCID: PMC5978450          DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoscience        ISSN: 2331-4737


× No keyword cloud information.
Gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in p53 are frequent in many human cancers and play key roles in tumor progression and development of drug resistance [1] (Figure 1). Unlike tumor suppressive wild-type (WT) p53 protein, which is rapidly turned over in cells by the ubiquitin proteasome system, the GOF mutants form stable aggregates that accumulate in cancer cells [1, 2] (Figure 1). Depletion of mutant GOF p53 mutants in cancer cells has been shown to induce cancer cell death; demonstrating a key role for these mutants in cancer cell survival and tumor progression [3, 4]. While the therapeutic merits of strategies that can selectively deplete GOF mutant p53 proteins in cancer cells are well appreciated, achieving such selective depletion in a clinically translatable manner has been difficult. A major challenge in developing a clinically viable strategy to selectively target mutant p53 proteins in cancer has been the need to differentiate and exclude the tumor suppressive wild-type p53 protein present in the healthy cells from being targeted. Realizing this goal requires better understanding of upstream regulators and pathways that selectively regulate the different p53 GOF mutants in cells. Recently, the deubiquitinase USP15 was identified as a selective upstream regulator of the p53- R175H conformational mutant in ovarian cancer cells [3]. Depletion of USP15 in ovarian cancer cells causes decrease in p53-R175H protein levels and induces cell death in cancer cells expressing this mutant form of p53 [3]. Thus, targeting USP15 provides a new and selective way to deplete p53-R175H protein and achieve killing of cancer cells carrying this mutation. USP15 levels have been shown to be elevated in many cancers and several new evidences linking the role of this deubiquitinase to cancer progression is beginning to emerge [5]. In addition to identifying a selective druggable regulator of p53-R175H mutant, this discovery also established the existence of unique regulators of the different GOF p53 mutants. Identifying these regulators will open up new avenues to target the respective oncogenic mutations in cancer cells.
Figure 1

GOF mutant p53 proteins form stable aggregates in cells and promotes tumor progression and development of drug resistance

Depletion of mutant p53 or their reactivation induces cancer cell death and causes tumor regression.

GOF mutant p53 proteins form stable aggregates in cells and promotes tumor progression and development of drug resistance

Depletion of mutant p53 or their reactivation induces cancer cell death and causes tumor regression. Other innovative approaches being pursued currently to target the GOF p53 mutants in cancer cells includes identifying small molecules and peptides that can bind to the mutant p53 proteins and induce conformational changes in the mutant protein that converts it to a more WT-like conformation [6]. This process is known as ‘reactivation' [6]. Reactivation thus helps increase WT p53 levels in cancer cells, which would in turn cause tumor suppression and activation of apoptosis in cancer cells [6]. Further, by converting the stable GOF p53 mutants to WT p53-like proteins, these small molecules will enable detection of mutant p53 by the targeted protein turnover mechanisms in cells that regulates the degradation of WT p53, leading to their depletion. Several pharmacological molecules have been identified so far that can cause reactivation of mutant p53. These include PRIMA-1 (p53 Reactivation and Induction of Massive Apoptosis), MIRA-1 (Mutant p53 reactivation and Induction of Rapid Apoptosis), and the methylated analog of PRIMA-1 (PRIMA-1MET or APR-246) [6]. While, the mechanisms through which these small molecules act differ, they have all enjoyed considerable success during in vitro experiments and pre-clinical animal studies. APR- 246 is currently being tested in phase II clinical trials for platinum resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer with mutated p53 [7]. Despite the promise of the current batch of mutant p53 targeting therapeutics, it is important for us to continue our efforts to identify new ways to selectively target mutant p53 in cancer cells as the extant molecules could face challenges during their clinical translation or have issues with development of drug resistance upon prolonged use. Pharmacological targeting of mutant p53 by small molecules is a rapidly evolving field that holds tremendous promise and potential to pave the way towards the development of novel anti-cancer agents that would allow personalized treatment based on the p53 mutation status of the patient's tumor. Understanding how the various GOF mutant forms of p53 differ, their specific roles in cancer progression, and developing novel therapeutics and strategies to target them selectively should certainly be priorities worth investing going forward.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Reactivation of mutant p53: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  G Selivanova; K G Wiman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Mutant p53: one name, many proteins.

Authors:  William A Freed-Pastor; Carol Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Pharmacological reactivation of p53 as a strategy to treat cancer.

Authors:  J Zawacka-Pankau; G Selivanova
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Limiting the power of p53 through the ubiquitin proteasome pathway.

Authors:  Vinod Pant; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Mutant p53-R273H mediates cancer cell survival and anoikis resistance through AKT-dependent suppression of BCL2-modifying factor (BMF).

Authors:  B S Tan; K H Tiong; H L Choo; F Fei-Lei Chung; L-W Hii; S H Tan; I K S Yap; S Pani; N T W Khor; S F Wong; R Rosli; S-K Cheong; C-O Leong
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  USP15-dependent lysosomal pathway controls p53-R175H turnover in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Achuth Padmanabhan; Nicholes Candelaria; Kwong-Kwok Wong; Bryan C Nikolai; David M Lonard; Bert W O'Malley; JoAnne S Richards
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  USP15 stabilizes MDM2 to mediate cancer-cell survival and inhibit antitumor T cell responses.

Authors:  Qiang Zou; Jin Jin; Hongbo Hu; Haiyan S Li; Simona Romano; Yichuan Xiao; Mako Nakaya; Xiaofei Zhou; Xuhong Cheng; Peirong Yang; Guillermina Lozano; Chengming Zhu; Stephanie S Watowich; Stephen E Ullrich; Shao-Cong Sun
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 25.606

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Zinc Oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative and proteotoxic stress in ovarian cancer cells and trigger apoptosis Independent of p53-mutation status.

Authors:  Achuth Padmanabhan; M Kaushik; R Niranjan; JoAnne S Richards; Brandon Ebright; G Devanand Venkatasubbu
Journal:  Appl Surf Sci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.707

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.