Literature DB >> 29854695

Microendoscopic Surgery with an Ultrasonic Bone Curette for a Patient with Intraforaminal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine Due to an Ossification Lesion: A Technical Case Report.

Masanari Takami1,2, Keiji Nagatal1, Hiroshi Yamada2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We present a rare case with radiculopathy resulting from intraforaminal stenosis of the lumbar spine due to an ossification lesion. Microendoscopic surgery was chosen because of two strong advantages. One was the ease to reach the nerve foramen and ossification lesion and the other was the non-invasiveness at the posterior supporting structures of the spine. Moreover, an ultrasonic bone curette developed for microendoscopic spine surgery was applied. This is the first detailed case report of microendoscopic surgery using an ultrasonic bone curette for a patient with radiculopathy due to intraforaminal free ossification. CASE REPORT: A 49-year-old woman born in Japan had complained of severe left leg pain for over 7 months in spite of conservative treatment including selective nerve root block. There was no lumbago, muscle weakness, or loss of sensation in her leg. Plain radiography revealed spondylolytic spondylolisthesis classified as Grade II at L4-L5, but there was no instability on dynamic assessment. Computed tomography (CT) showed a free ossification lesion in the foramen at L4-L5. Considering a diagnosis of left L4 radiculopathy due to the free ossification, ossification resection and nerve decompression were performed with posterior spinal microendoscopic surgery using an ultrasonic bone curette. A tubular retractor was introduced into the extraforaminal zone using Wiltse approach. After a part of the ossification lesion and the nerve root were exposed, an ultrasonic bone curette was applied to remove the ossification mass. After decompression, the nerve root was found to be relaxed. The surgical time was 83 min, and blood loss was 5 g. According to the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system, her score improved from 21/29 preoperatively to 29/29 postoperatively, and the full score was maintained at the final observation. Post-operative CT revealed the absence of an ossification lesion.
CONCLUSIONS: For a rare case with radiculopathy resulting from intraforaminal stenosis of the lumbar spine due to an ossification lesion, microendoscopic surgery with an ultrasonic bone curette was very effective. The use of ultrasonic bone curette is easy and safe in microendoscopic surgery and it helps achieve less invasiveness and ideal decompression, without injuring the nerve root.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraforaminal stenosis; microendoscopic spine surgery; ossification lesion; radiculopathy; spondylolytic spondylolisthesis; ultrasonic bone curette

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854695      PMCID: PMC5974679          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


Learning Point for this Article: The use of ultrasonic bone curette is easy, safe, and very effective in microendoscopic spine surgery and it helps achieve less invasiveness and ideal decompression, without injuring the nerve root.

Introduction

We experienced to treat a patient with intraforaminal stenosis of the lumbar spine due to intraforaminal free ossification. Strategies for the surgical treatment of patients with intraforaminal lesions have been reported [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Spinal fusion surgery allows surgeons to reach the intraforaminal space easily; however, this method is invasive. We introduced microendoscopic surgery using an ultrasonic bone curette for the patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detailed case report of microendoscopic surgery using an ultrasonic bone curette.

Case report

A 49-year-old woman complained of severe left leg pain and could no t walk or stand up. She presented with left buttock and anterior thigh pain along the L4 dermatome. There was no lumbago, muscle weakness, or loss of sensation in her leg. The femoral nerve-stretching test was positive on the left side. Plain radiography of the lumbar vertebrae revealed spondylolytic spondylolisthesis at L4-L5, which was classified as Grade IIaccording to Meyerding classification(Fig. l); however, there was no instability on dynamic assessment. Computed tomography (CT) showed a free ossification lesion in the foramen and ossification of the yellow ligament at L4-L5, without a ragged edge (Fig. 2). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed no compression and stenotic lesion in the canal or fibrocartilaginous mass (Fig. 3). Considering a diagnosis of left L4 radiculopathy because of the free ossification in the foramen at L4-L5, selective nerve root block was performed, and it was very effective temporally. However, because her leg pain occurred repeatedly, operative treatment was planned over 7 months after the initial visit to our hospital. Ossification resection and nerve decompression were ι performed with posterior spinal microendoscopic surgery using the METRx endoscopic system (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, USA). Thepatient was placed in the prone position on a 4-poster spinal frame under general anesthesia. A 16-mm skin incision was made 6cm lateral from the central line of the spinous process and at the L4 transverse process (TP) on the left side. A tubular retractor was introduced into the extraforaminal zone between the multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle. After removing the caudal side of the left L4-TP by drilling using a diamond bur and the inter-TP ligament, a part of the ossification lesion and the nerve root were exposed (Fig. 4a). After careful ablation between the ossification lesion and nerve root, the ossification lesion was excised, and an ultrasonic bone curette (Sonopet TM Ultrasonic Aspirator, Stryker Corp., Kalamazoo, MI, USA) was applied to remove the ossification mass (Fig. 4b). The deep lesion near the entrance zone was carefully treated. After decompression by resection of the ossification lesion, the nerve root was found to be relaxed (Fig. 4c).The surgical time was 83min, and blood loss was only 5g. She mentioned that there was no leg symptom immediately after the surgery and could walk without an aid on the next day of the surgery. According to the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system, her score improved from 21/29 preoperatively to 29/29 postoperatively, and the full score was maintained at the final observation 45 months after the surgery. Post-operative CT revealed the absence of an ossification lesion (Fig. 5) and no lumbar instability.
Figure 1

Coronal view of plain lumbar radiography. Coronal view of plain lumbar radiography shows spondylolisthesis ofL4 and no scoliosis (a). Lateral view of plain lumbar radiography shows spondylolytic spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 (classified as Grade II on Meyerding classification) and an unclear foramen at L4-L5 (b).

Figure 2

Sagittal view and axial view of computed tomography (CT). Sagittal view (a) and axial view (b) of CT shows a free large ossification lesion in the intraforaminal space and ossification ofthe yellow ligament at L4-L5.

Figure 3

Sagittal view and axial view of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sagittal view (a) and axial view (b) ofMRI indicates no stenosis and compression lesion at the dura and nerve root in the canal.

Figure 4

Microendoscopic images during surgery. A part ofthe ossification lesion (dash line) and the nerve root (asterisk) are exposed before excision (a). An ultrasonic bone curette (white star) is applied to remove the ossification lesion and decompress the nerve root (asterisk) (b). After excision ofthe ossification lesion, spaces could be observed at both the cranial and caudal sides of the nerve root (asterisk), and the nerve root is relaxed (c).

Figure 5

Computed tomography (CT) after surgery. CT shows the absence of an ossification lesion at 45 months after surgery.

Sagittal view and axial view of computed tomography (CT). Sagittal view (a) and axial view (b) of CT shows a free large ossification lesion in the intraforaminal space and ossification ofthe yellow ligament at L4-L5. Sagittal view and axial view of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sagittal view (a) and axial view (b) ofMRI indicates no stenosis and compression lesion at the dura and nerve root in the canal. Microendoscopic images during surgery. A part ofthe ossification lesion (dash line) and the nerve root (asterisk) are exposed before excision (a). An ultrasonic bone curette (white star) is applied to remove the ossification lesion and decompress the nerve root (asterisk) (b). After excision ofthe ossification lesion, spaces could be observed at both the cranial and caudal sides of the nerve root (asterisk), and the nerve root is relaxed (c). Computed tomography (CT) after surgery. CT shows the absence of an ossification lesion at 45 months after surgery. An image of an ultrasonic bone curette. The tip of an ultrasonic bone curette was developed to be bent moderately to use easily under a microendoscope with the property of its 25° oblique view. Coronal view of plain lumbar radiography. Coronal view of plain lumbar radiography shows spondylolisthesis ofL4 and no scoliosis (a). Lateral view of plain lumbar radiography shows spondylolytic spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 (classified as Grade II on Meyerding classification) and an unclear foramen at L4-L5 (b).

Discussion

For this ossification lesion, some surgical options could be considered [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. In general, posterior fusion approaches, such as posterolateral fusion surgery and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, are selected [4]. However, these methods were considered invasive and problematic, with the possible occurrence of adjacent segment disease in the future because the patient was relatively young. Only decompression of the nerve root and open surgery through the Wiltse approach was considered [5], but entire foraminal space and the whole ossification lesion were never invisible with this means, unless almost all parts of the posterior supporting structures of the spine, such as the facet joint and pars interarticular is, were resected. Spinal canal enlargement using restorative laminoplasty is a non-fusion surgical approach and had the advantage of visibility in the foramen, but this approach is more invasive than our approach and includes a complicated procedure[1]. Nerve root decompression without instrumented fusion, i.e., Gill’s procedure[2], was not chosen because progression of anterior slip or instability could occur. Our microendoscopic method had two major advantages. One was the ease to reach the nerve foramen and ossification lesion. The reason for this was that spinal microendoscopy provides an overview of the intra foramen from the outside using the property of its 25° oblique view, without resection of the pars interarticularis and facet joint[6]. The other was the non- invasiveness at the posterior supporting structures of the spine. Therefore, we believed that our approach was the most ideal option to surgically treat our patient. Some studies have reported on the use of an ultrasonic bone curette in spinal surgery [7, 8, 9]. Although minor complications of dural tears with the use of this device have been reported [8], its use is safe in spinal surgery, with a very low complication rate [7, 9], and it is effective with a trend of reduced blood loss[7]. Some reports stated that this device was efficient during foraminotomy, cervical and thoracic corpectomies, and revision spinal surgery [7, 9]. However, there has been no report on its application in microendoscopic spinal surgery. Because the tip of this device was developed to be bent moderately(Fig. 6), it is easy to use under a microendoscope with the property of its 25° oblique view. We emphasize that the use of an ultrasonic bone curette in microendoscopic spinal surgery could allow the effective, less invasive, and safe removal of an intraforaminal bony lesion, without the occurrence of allodynia associated with injury to the DRG [10].
Figure 6

An image of an ultrasonic bone curette. The tip of an ultrasonic bone curette was developed to be bent moderately to use easily under a microendoscope with the property of its 25° oblique view.

Conclusion

For a rare case with radiculopathy resulting from intraforaminal stenosis of the lumbar spine due to an ossification lesion, microendoscopic surgery with an ultrasonic bone curette was applied. The use of ultrasonic bone curette is easy, safe, and effective in microendoscopic surgery and it helps achieve less invasiveness and ideal decompression, without injuring the nerve root. This is the first detailed case report of microendoscopic spine surgery using an ultrasonic bone curette for a patient with radiculopathy due to intraforaminal free ossification. The use of ultrasonic bone curette is easy, safe, and very effective in microendoscopic spine surgery and it helps achieve less invasiveness and ideal decompression, without injuring the nerve root.
  10 in total

1.  Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression.

Authors:  J Kunogi; M Hasue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Efficacy of novel minimally invasive surgery using spinal microendoscope for treating extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamada; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Masaki Kawai; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Syunji Tsutsui
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-07

Review 3.  Fusion techniques for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shan-Jin Wang; Ying-Chao Han; Xiao-Ming Liu; Bin Ma; Wei-Dong Zhao; De-Sheng Wu; Jun Tan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; J G Bateman; R H Hutchinson; W E Nelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Far lateral disc herniations treated by microscopic fragment excision. Techniques and results.

Authors:  B V Darden; J F Wade; R Alexander; K E Wood; A L Rhyne; J R Hicks
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-term follow-up evaluation of a few patients with spondylolisthesis treated by excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots without spinal fusion.

Authors:  G G Gill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Spinal canal enlargement procedure by restorative laminoplasty for the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis.

Authors:  Ko Adachi; Toshiro Futami; Ario Ebihara; Tomoyasu Yamaya; Norikazu Kasai; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Safety of spinal decompression using an ultrasonic bone curette compared with a high-speed drill: outcomes in 337 patients.

Authors:  Mohamad Bydon; Risheng Xu; Kyriakos Papademetriou; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; George Jallo; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-04-05

9.  Applications of the ultrasonic bone cutter in spinal surgery--our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Rafid Al-Mahfoudh; Eman Qattan; Jonathan Richard Ellenbogen; Martin Wilby; Chris Barrett; Tim Pigott
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  Technical Aspects on the Use of Ultrasonic Bone Shaver in Spine Surgery: Experience in 307 Patients.

Authors:  Derya Burcu Hazer; Barış Yaşar; Hans-Eric Rosberg; Aytaç Akbaş
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effect evaluation of acupuncture combined with nerve block treatment on patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Shuai Dai; Aimin Yang
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  Novel Application of an Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator for Endoscopic Modified Medial Maxillectomy.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takakura; Hirohiko Tachino; Yutaro Oi; Tram Anh Do; Hideo Shojaku
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.