Literature DB >> 29854222

Reconciliation of multiple guidelines for decision support: a case study on the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer within the DESIREE project.

Brigitte Séroussi1,2,3, Gilles Guézennec1, Jean-Baptiste Lamy1, Naiara Muro1,4,5, Nekane Larburu4,5, Booma Devi Sekar6, Coralie Prebet7, Jacques Bouaud1,8.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. DESIREE is a European project which aims at developing web-based services for the management of primary breast cancer by multidisciplinary breast units (BUs). We describe the guideline-based decision support system (GL-DSS) of the project. Various breast cancer clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been selected to be concurrently applied to provide state-of-the-art patient-specific recommendations. The aim is to reconcile CPG recommendations with the objective of complementarity to enlarge the number of clinical situations covered by the GL-DSS. Input and output data exchange with the GL-DSS is performed using FHIR. We used a knowledge model of the domain as an ontology on which relies the reasoning process performed by rules that encode the selected CPGs. Semantic web tools were used, notably the Euler/EYE inference engine, to implement the GL-DSS. "Rainbow boxes" are a synthetic tabular display used to visualize the inferred recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854222      PMCID: PMC5977621     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  22 in total

Review 1.  Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.

Authors:  Mor Peleg
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Implementation and evaluation of an Asbru-based decision support system for adjuvant treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Eccher; Andreas Seyfang; Antonella Ferro
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Automatic generation of computable implementation guides from clinical information models.

Authors:  Diego Boscá; José Alberto Maldonado; David Moner; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Ontology-based modeling of clinical practice guidelines: a clinical decision support system for breast cancer follow-up interventions at primary care settings.

Authors:  Samina R Abidi; Syed S R Abidi; Sajjad Hussain; Mike Shepherd
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

5.  Compliance with consensus recommendations for systemic therapy is associated with improved survival of women with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicole Hébert-Croteau; Jacques Brisson; Jean Latreille; Michèle Rivard; Nadia Abdelaziz; Ginette Martin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  An Ontology-Based Clinical Decision Support System for the Management of Patients with Multiple Chronic Disorders.

Authors:  Alexandre Galopin; Jacques Bouaud; Suzanne Pereira; Brigitte Seroussi
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

7.  Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women.

Authors:  Eileen M Kesson; Gwen M Allardice; W David George; Harry J G Burns; David S Morrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-26

8.  Breast cancer care compared with clinical Guidelines: an observational study in France.

Authors:  Marie Lebeau; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Carine Bellera; Christine Tunon-de-Lara; Alain Daban; Francis Lipinski; Dominique Jaubert; Pierre Ingrand; Virginie Migeot
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; Shikha Misra; Hertzel C Gerstein; Amit X Garg; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology.

Authors:  Vivek Patkar; Dionisio Acosta; Tim Davidson; Alison Jones; John Fox; Mohammad Keshtgar
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-07-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Transformation of the National Breast Cancer Guideline Into Data-Driven Clinical Decision Trees.

Authors:  Mathijs P Hendriks; Xander A A M Verbeek; Thijs van Vegchel; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Luc J A Strobbe; Jos W S Merkus; Harmien M Zonderland; Carolien H Smorenburg; Agnes Jager; Sabine S Siesling
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-05

Review 2.  New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation.

Authors:  Peter Taber; Christina Radloff; Guilherme Del Fiol; Catherine Staes; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2021-09-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.