Literature DB >> 29854211

Stage-Specific Survivability Prediction Models across Different Cancer Types.

Elham Sagheb Hossein Pour1, Rohit J Kate2.   

Abstract

For all cancer types, survivability rates vary widely across different stages of cancer. But survivability prediction models built in past were trained using examples of all stages together and were also evaluated on all stages together. In this work, for ten cancer types and using three machine learning methods, we built survivability prediction models trained on each stage separately and compared their performance with the traditional models trained on all stages together. For both kinds of models, the evaluation was done on each stage separately as well as on all stages together. Our results show that for most cancer types the stages are sufficiently different from each other that it is best to build survivability prediction models separately for each stage. We also found that evaluating survivability prediction models on all stages together, as was done previously, overestimates performance for all the stages on all cancer types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854211      PMCID: PMC5977641     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  9 in total

1.  Artificial neural networks applied to outcome prediction for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions.

Authors:  L Bottaci; P J Drew; J E Hartley; M B Hadfield; R Farouk; P W Lee; I M Macintyre; G S Duthie; J R Monson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods.

Authors:  Dursun Delen; Glenn Walker; Amit Kadam
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Stage-specific predictive models for breast cancer survivability.

Authors:  Rohit J Kate; Ramya Nadig
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Deaths: Final Data for 2014.

Authors:  Kenneth D Kochanek; Sherry L Murphy; Jiaquan Xu; Betzaida Tejada-Vera
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2016-06

5.  Comparison of a genetic algorithm neural network with logistic regression for predicting outcome after surgery for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  M F Jefferson; N Pendleton; S B Lucas; M A Horan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Breast cancer survivability prediction using labeled, unlabeled, and pseudo-labeled patient data.

Authors:  Juhyeon Kim; Hyunjung Shin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11

8.  Oral cancer prognosis based on clinicopathologic and genomic markers using a hybrid of feature selection and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Siow-Wee Chang; Sameem Abdul-Kareem; Amir Feisal Merican; Rosnah Binti Zain
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction.

Authors:  Konstantina Kourou; Themis P Exarchos; Konstantinos P Exarchos; Michalis V Karamouzis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.271

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.