Literature DB >> 29854122

Specifications of Clinical Quality Measures and Value Set Vocabularies Shift Over Time: A Study of Change through Implementation Differences.

Raja A Cholan1, Nicole G Weiskopf1, Douglas L Rhoton1, Nicholas V Colin1, Rachel L Ross1, Melanie N Marzullo1, Bhavaya Sachdeva1, David A Dorr1.   

Abstract

Clinical quality measures (CQMs) aim to identify gaps in care and to promote evidence-based guidelines. Official CQM definitions consist of a measure's logic and grouped, standardized codes to define key concepts. In this study, we used the official CQM update process to understand how CQMs' meanings change over time. First, we identified differences between the narrative description, logic, and the vocabulary specifications offour standardized CQMs' definitions in subsequent versions (2015, 2016, and 2017). Next, we implemented the various versions in a quality measure calculation registry to understand how the differences affected calculated prevalence of risk and measure performance. Global performance rates changed up to 5.32%, and an increase of up to 28% new patients was observed for key conditions between versions. Updates to definitions that change a measure's logic and choices to include/exclude codes in value set vocabularies changes measurement of quality and likely introduces variation by implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854122      PMCID: PMC5977609     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  17 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

Authors:  Avedis Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record.

Authors:  Carol P Roth; Yee-Wei Lim; Joshua M Pevnick; Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare.

Authors:  Youssra Marjoua; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-12

4.  A multi-perspective analysis of lessons learned from building an Integrated Care Coordination Information System (ICCIS).

Authors:  Jordan A Dale; Nima A Behkami; Gwenivere S Olsen; David A Dorr
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  High-quality, standard, controlled healthcare terminologies come of age.

Authors:  J J Cimino
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

7.  Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Morten L Hansen; Rikke Sørensen; Mette T Clausen; Marie Louise Fog-Petersen; Jakob Raunsø; Niels Gadsbøll; Gunnar H Gislason; Fredrik Folke; Søren S Andersen; Tina K Schramm; Steen Z Abildstrøm; Henrik E Poulsen; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-13

8.  Risks and benefits of combining aspirin with anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: an exploratory analysis of stroke prevention using an oral thrombin inhibitor in atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF) trials.

Authors:  Greg C Flaker; Michael Gruber; Stuart J Connolly; Steven Goldman; Sandra Chaparro; Alec Vahanian; Matti O Halinen; Jay Horrow; Jonathan L Halperin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring.

Authors:  Amanda Parsons; Colleen McCullough; Jason Wang; Sarah Shih
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Generating and Reporting Electronic Clinical Quality Measures from Electronic Health Records: Strategies from EvidenceNOW Cooperatives.

Authors:  Joshua E Richardson; Luke V Rasmussen; David A Dorr; Jenna T Sirkin; Donna Shelley; Adovich Rivera; Winfred Wu; Samuel Cykert; Deborah J Cohen; Abel N Kho
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Understanding the Impact of Variations in Measurement Period Reporting for Electronic Clinical Quality Measures.

Authors:  Nicholas V Colin; Raja A Cholan; Bhavaya Sachdeva; Benjamin E Nealy; Michael L Parchman; David A Dorr
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2018-07-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.