| Literature DB >> 29853975 |
Kazim Sahin1, Mehmet Tuzcu2, Cemal Orhan1, Hasan Gencoglu2, Nurhan Sahin1, Fatih Akdemir3, Gaffari Turk4, Ismet Yilmaz5, Vijaya Juturu6.
Abstract
Mucuna pruriens, Ashwagandha, and Tribulus terrestris are known as the enhancers for sexual health, functional activities, vitality, and longevity. These herbs had been widely used in the Ayurveda medicine as aphrodisiacs through the ages, and their efficacy was also verified separately in our previous publication. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of Mucuna, Ashwagandha, and Tribulus complexes on sexual function in rats. Twenty-eight male rats allocated to four groups as follows: (i) negative control (C); (ii) positive control or sildenafil citrate treated group (5 mg/kg) (S); (iii) MAT1 (combination of 10 mg Mucuna (M) + 10 mg Ashwagandha (A) + 10 mg Tribulus (T)/kg BW); (iv) MAT 2 (20 mg Mucuna + 20 mg Ashwagandha + 20 mg Tribulus/kg BW). There was no significant difference found between the MAT1 and MAT2 groups while they showed significantly increased testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels when compared to the negative control. Significant increases in Nrf2/HO1 levels and decreases in NF-κB were detected in MAT groups similar to the decrease in serum and testis malondialdehyde (MDA) levels as compared to both controls. The sperm motility, count, and rate also significantly improved in both MAT groups, while ALT, AST, creatinine, ALP, and urea levels did not change in any of the groups. Oral consumption of MATs combination in male rats resulted in inhibition of NF-κB and MDA and also increased sex hormones with Nrf2-mediated HO-1 induction. MAT combinations may improve sexual functions by increasing levels of sexual hormones and regulation of NF-κB and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathways.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29853975 PMCID: PMC5949178 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8521782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The effects of extracts on final body weight and absolute and relative reproductive organ weights.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sildenafil | MAT I | MAT II | |
| Final body weight, g | 267.00 ± 4.57 | 254.67 ± 10.26 | 262.50 ± 12.65 | 260.83 ± 9.44 |
| Testis, g | 1.178 ± 0.017 | 1.174 ± 0.029 | 1.227 ± 0.068 | 1.257 ± 0.058 |
| Whole epididymis, g | 0.473 ± 0.007 | 0.468 ± 0.020 | 0.462 ± 0.018 | 0.418 ± 0.015 |
| Right cauda epididymis, g | 0.170 ± 0.003 | 0.172 ± 0.005 | 0.185 ± 0.014 | 0.175 ± 0.010 |
| Vas deferens, g | 0.109 ± 0.004 | 0.112 ± 0.008 | 0.118 ± 0.010 | 0.117 ± 0.012 |
| Seminal vesicles, g | 1.313 ± 0.094ab | 1.575 ± 0.070a | 1.508 ± 0.089ab | 1.203 ± 0.050b |
| Ventral prostate, g | 0.408 ± 0.027b | 0.478 ± 0.037ab | 0.565 ± 0.027a | 0.528 ± 0.026a |
| Testis | 0.442 ± 0.011 | 0.460 ± 0.022 | 0.469 ± 0.022 | 0.483 ± 0.020 |
| Whole epididymis | 0.178 ± 0.003 | 0.184 ± 0.012 | 0.178 ± 0.009 | 0.185 ± 0.007 |
| Right Cauda epididymis | 0.064 ± 0.001 | 0.067 ± 0.004 | 0.071 ± 0.004 | 0.067 ± 0.003 |
| Vas deferens | 0.041 ± 0.002 | 0.044 ± 0.003 | 0.045 ± 0.003 | 0.045 ± 0.004 |
| Seminal vesicles | 0.493 ± 0.037bc | 0.621 ± 0.026a | 0.577 ± 0.030ab | 0.462 ± 0.013c |
| Ventral prostate | 0.153 ± 0.009b | 0.187 ± 0.010ab | 0.217 ± 0.011a | 0.204 ± 0.014a |
Relative reproductive organ weights [organ weight (g)/final body weight (g) × 100]; data are means ± SE. Different superscripts (a–c) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05).
The effects of extracts on sperm characteristics and abnormal sperm rate, %.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sildenafil | MAT I | MAT II | |
| Motility, % | 63.88 ± 2.00b | 73.98 ± 4.13ab | 82.75 ± 3.59a | 83.33 ± 2.11a |
| Count | 111.67 ± 2.65b | 152.80 ± 11.22a | 145.00 ± 12.77ab | 165.33 ± 5.90a |
|
| ||||
| Head | 6.83 ± 1.52 | 6.40 ± 2.54 | 5.83 ± 0.87 | 5.00 ± 1.37 |
| Tail | 4.67 ± 1.02ab | 4.60 ± 0.93ab | 3.17 ± 1.08b | 8.50 ± 1.80a |
| Total | 11.50 ± 1.80 | 11.00 ± 3.13 | 9.00 ± 1.75 | 13.50 ± 1.15 |
Data are means ± SE. Different superscripts (a, b) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05); million/right cauda epididymis.
The effects of extracts on serum biochemical parameters.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sildenafil | MAT I | MAT II | |
| ALP, U/L | 193.71 ± 4.67 | 191.57 ± 3.76 | 203.29 ± 4.19 | 204.57 ± 3.88 |
| ALT, U/L | 45.43 ± 2.06 | 47.57 ± 2.97 | 44.57 ± 2.36 | 44.00 ± 2.43 |
| AST, U/L | 93.43 ± 3.34 | 100.71 ± 3.78 | 93.29 ± 3.38 | 92.00 ± 2.88 |
| BUN, mg/dl | 33.57 ± 0.75 | 33.86 ± 0.63 | 33.14 ± 0.80 | 33.29 ± 0.57 |
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; data are means ± SE.
The effects of extracts on serum gonadotropic/androgenic hormones and MDA levels.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sildenafil | MAT I | MAT II | |
| FSH, mIU/ml | 0.28 ± 0.03b | 0.45 ± 0.03a | 0.38 ± 0.02a | 0.44 ± 0.02a |
| LH, mIU/ml | 0.22 ± 0.05b | 0.40 ± 0.04a | 0.33 ± 0.02ab | 0.38 ± 0.02a |
| Testosterone, ng/ml | 2.27 ± 0.08c | 4.35 ± 0.17a | 3.46 ± 0.05b | 3.85 ± 0.07b |
| Serum MDA, | 0.60 ± 0.02a | 0.61 ± 0.02a | 0.44 ± 0.02b | 0.39 ± 0.02b |
| Testis MDA, nmol/g | 1.74 ± 0.02a | 1.79 ± 0.03a | 1.50 ± 0.01b | 1.41 ± 0.01c |
FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; MDA: malondialdehyde. Data are means ± SE. Different superscripts (a–c) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Western blot bands of NF-κB, Nrf-2, HO-1, and β-actin (Panel (a)), together with NF-κB (Panel (b)), Nrf-2 (Panel (c)), and HO-1 (Panel (d)) comparative levels among the groups in male rats (P < 0.0001). Data are expressed as a ratio of normal control value (set to 100%). Blots were repeated at least 4 times (n = 4) and a representative blot is shown. β-Actin band is included as a housekeeping protein to confirm equal protein loading. The bars describe the mean and standard error. Data points with different superscripts significantly differ at the level of P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test.