| Literature DB >> 29853952 |
Iram Liaqat1, Naila Riaz2, Qurat-Ul-Ain Saleem2, Hafiz Muhammad Tahir1, Muhammad Arshad3, Najma Arshad2.
Abstract
Essential oils are produced as secondary metabolites by aromatic plants, predominantly belonging to families Apiaceae, Lamiaceae, Myrtaceae, and Rutaceae. The family Rutaceae has great economic importance for its numerous edible fruits and essential oils. In the present study, essential oils of seven plants of family Rutaceae, Aegle marmelos, Murraya koenigii, Citrus reticulata Blanco, Zanthoxylum armatum, Skimmia laureola, Murraya paniculata, and Boenninghausenia albiflora, were used for their toxicological assessment. Seven groups of selected essential oils-treated Wistar rats were established against control group (n = 5) that received water for 14 days; animals were offered feed and water ad libitum and treated with essential oils at 400 mg/kg body weight. Hematological studies revealed significant elevation in TEC in animals treated with essential oils of M. koenigii, S. laureola, and B. albiflora, while an elevation in PCV and depletion in MCV were observed in animals treated with M. paniculata and B. albiflora, respectively. Serological investigations demonstrated significant depletion in triglycerides and elevation in blood sodium level in animals treated with essential oils of A. marmelos and C. reticulata Blanco. Boenninghausenia albiflora affected many markers including RBC, MCV, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, urea, and sodium. In conclusion, all oils except B. albiflora can be considered safe for internal use.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29853952 PMCID: PMC5960565 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4394687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Zone of inhibition of different essential oils against four bacterial isolates.
| Oils | Gram-positive bacteria | Gram-negative bacteria | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| I | 24 | 18 | 18 | 20 |
| II | 10 | 14 | 10 | 14 |
| III | 16 | 12 | 11 | 10 |
| IV | 14 | 15 | 11 | 10 |
| V | 18 | 18 | 13 | 14 |
| VI | 14 | 15 | 9 | 12 |
| VII | 18 | 20 | 8 | 15 |
Zone of inhibition of selected essential oils against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae (I, Aegle marmelos; II, Murraya koenigii; III, Citrus reticulata Blanco; IV, Zanthoxylum armatum; V, Skimmia laureola; VI, Murraya paniculata; and VII, Boenninghausenia albiflora).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of different oils against four bacterial isolates (% v/v).
| Essential oils | Gram-positive bacteria | Gram-negative bacteria | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | |
|
| 5 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
| 5 | 5 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 10 |
|
| 0.312 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 5 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
| 0.625 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
|
| 1.25 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 5 | 5 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.156 | 0.16 | 2.5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Figure 1Comparison of hematological parameters in the essential oil- (EO-) fed animals and non-EO-treated (control) animals (I). A-1, hemoglobin (mg/dl); A-2, total erythrocyte count (×106/μl); A-3, total leucocyte count (×103/μl); A-4, packed cell volume (%); A-5, mean corpuscular volume (fL∗10/cell); A-6, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg/cell); and A-7, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (g/dl). Data is presented as mean ± SEM. Asterisks show significant difference from control.
Figure 2Comparison of liver and renal function tests of essential oil- (EO-) fed animals and control animals. B-1, bilirubin (×100 mg/dl); B-2, alanine transaminase (IU/L) and aspartate transaminase (IU/L); B-3, alkaline phosphatase (U/dl); B-4, urea (mg/dl); and B-5, creatinine (×100 mg/dl). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Asterisks on respective groups show significant difference from control group at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3Comparison of lipid profile (mg/dL) in essential oil- (EO-) fed animals and non-EO-treated control animals (I). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, while asterisks on respective EO groups show significant difference from control at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4Comparison of blood electrolytes in essential oil- (EO-) fed animals and control animals (I). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Asterisks on respective EO groups show significant difference from control at p ≤ 0.05.