| Literature DB >> 29853829 |
Snežana Rajković1, Beata Warżajtis2, Marija D Živković3, Biljana Đ Glišić1, Urszula Rychlewska2, Miloš I Djuran4.
Abstract
Dinuclear platinum(II) complexes, [{Pt(en)Cl}2(μ-qx)]Cl2·2H2O (1), [{Pt(en)Cl}2(μ-qz)](ClO4)2 (2), and [{Pt(en)Cl}2(μ-phtz)]Cl2·4H2O (3), were synthesized and characterized by different spectroscopic techniques. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, while the DFT M06-2X method was applied in order to optimize the structures of 1-3. The chlorido Pt(II) complexes 1-3 were converted into the corresponding aqua species 1a-3a, and their reactions with an equimolar amount of Ac-L-Met-Gly and Ac-L-His-Gly dipeptides were studied by 1H NMR spectroscopy in the pH range 2.0 < pH < 2.5 at 37°C. It was found that, in all investigated reactions with the Ac-L-Met-Gly dipeptide, the cleavage of the Met-Gly amide bond had occurred, but complexes 2a and 3a showed lower catalytic activity than 1a. However, in the reactions with Ac-L-His-Gly dipeptide, the hydrolysis of the amide bond involving the carboxylic group of histidine was observed only with complex 1a. The observed disparity in the catalytic activity of these complexes is thought to be due to different relative positioning of nitrogen atoms in the bridging qx, qz, and phtz ligands and consequent variation in the intramolecular separation of the two platinum(II) metal centers.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29853829 PMCID: PMC5967607 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3294948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Figure 1Schematic drawing of the N-heterocycles used in this study (a) and the structures of dinuclear platinum(II) complexes 1–3 calculated at the M06-2X(PCM)/cc-pVTZ+LanL2TZ(f) level of theory. The numbering scheme of carbon atoms in N-heterocycles is in agreement with IUPAC recommendations for the fused ring system and does not match the one applied in the X-ray study of 1.
NMR (1H and 13C) chemical and coordination shifts (δ, ppm), alongside multiplicities and coupling constants (JH-H, Hz), for the N-heterocyclic ligands and the corresponding dinuclear platinum(II) complexes 1–3 in D2O as a solvent with TSP as the internal standard.
| Atom position | 1H | 13C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qx |
| qx |
| |
| 2,3 | 8.44, s | 9.59, s (+1.15) | 145.67 | 151.77 (+6.10) |
| 5,8 | 7.51, m | 9.73, dd, | 131.94 | 135.93 (+3.99) |
| 6,7 | 7.51, m | 8.41, dd, | 128.83 | 130.09 (+1.26) |
| 4a,8a | — | — | 141.85 | 145.26 (+3.41) |
| qz |
| qz |
| |
| 2 | 9.09, s | 10.12, d, | 163.39 | 178.11 (+14.72) |
| 4 | 8.84, s | 9.52, d, | 156.05 | 168.56 (+12.51) |
| 5 | 7.80, m | 8.51, m | 129.07 | 130.14 (+1.07) |
| 8 | (+0.71) | 131.53 | 132.81 (+1.28) | |
| 6 | 7.79, m | 8.16, m | 130.60 | 135.11 (+4.51) |
| 7 | (+0.37) | 138.42 | 143.10 (+4.68) | |
| 4a | — | — | 126.98 | 128.58 (+1.60) |
| 8a | — | — | 150.76 | 152.39 (+1.63) |
| phtz |
| phtz |
| |
| 1,4 | 9.18, s | 10.05, s (+0.87) | 154.27 | 164.32 (+10.05) |
| 6,7 | 7.88, m | 8.40, m (+0.52) | 136.61 | 140.50 (+3.89) |
| 5,8 | 7.88, m | 8.40, m (+0.52) | 129.38 | 131.04 (+1.66) |
| 4a,8a | — | — | 129.04 | 130.96 (+1.92) |
The aliphatic methylene protons of the bidentatedly coordinated en ligand in 1–3 give a singlet in the region 2.78–2.84 ppm, while the resonance for the corresponding carbon atoms is in the region 49.42–51.27 ppm. s = singlet; d = doublet; dd = doublet of doublets; m = multiplet.
Figure 2Perspective view of the dinuclear complex cation [{Pt(en)Cl}2(μ-qx)]2+ in the crystal of 1 at 295 K. Atomic displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% probability level.
Figure 3Arrangement of molecules constituting the multicomponent crystal of [{Pt(en)Cl}2(μ-qx)]Cl2·2H2O (1). Hydrogen bonds are marked by dotted lines, and π⋯π interactions operate between partially overlapping molecules that stack along the b-direction. Structural voids filled by water molecules and chloride ions are shaded in yellow, while benzene rings involved in stacking interactions are shaded in purple.
Figure 4Schematic presentation of the hydrolytic reaction of Ac–L–Met–Gly (a) and Ac–L–His–Gly (b) in the presence of complexes 1a–3a in the pH range 2.0 < pH < 2.5 in D2O as a solvent and at 37°C. In the reaction with Ac–L–His–Gly, only 1a was catalytically active complex.
Figure 5Time dependence of the hydrolytic cleavage of the Met–Gly amide bond in Ac–L–Met–Gly dipeptide in the presence of equimolar amount of 1a–3a complexes in the pH range 2.0 < pH < 2.5 and at 37°C.
Comparison of the catalytic activities between 1a and [{Pt(en)(H2O)}2(μ-pz)]4+ [35] and 3a and [{Pt(en)(H2O)}2(μ-pydz)]4+ [44] complexes in the hydrolysis of Ac–L–Met–Gly dipeptide.
| Platinum(II) complex | Hydrolyzed Met-Gly amide bond (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h | 12 h | 24 h | |
| [{Pt(en)(H2O)}2( | 35 | 52 | 60 |
| [{Pt(en)(H2O)}2( | 60 | 85 | 88 |
| [{Pt(en)(H2O)}2( | 8 | 28 | 41 |
| [{Pt(en)(H2O)}2( | 12 | 36 | 54 |