| Literature DB >> 29853795 |
Aldona Pietrzak1, Ewelina Grywalska2, Mateusz Socha3, Jacek Roliński2, Kinga Franciszkiewicz-Pietrzak4, Lidia Rudnicka5, Marcin Rudzki6, Dorota Krasowska1.
Abstract
Although fungal colonization is implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, its prevalence remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an overview on the prevalence of Candida species in patients with psoriasis. We searched databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and http://clinicaltrials.gov) to identify studies involving subjects of any age with an established diagnosis of psoriasis and healthy controls, who were tested for carriage of Candida spp. on the skin or mucosal membranes (or saliva and stool), or presented with clinical candidiasis with microbiologically confirmed etiology. We identified nine cross-sectional studies including a total of 1038 subjects with psoriasis (psoriatics) and 669 controls. We found Candida species detection rates for psoriatics were significantly higher than those in the controls, especially in the oral mucosa milieux. These results suggest psoriasis may be one of the systemic diseases that predispose to oral Candida spp. carriage and infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29853795 PMCID: PMC5960518 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9602362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Figure 1(a) Meta-analysis of nine studies (among them, three contained two different types of examined material) comparing odds ratios (ORs) for the detection of Candida spp. from the skin or mucosal membranes of psoriasis patients and healthy controls of any age. (b) Meta-analysis of six studies (among them, one contained two different types of examined material) comparing odds ratios (ORs) for the detection of Candida spp. from the skin or mucosal membranes of adult psoriasis patients and healthy controls.
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Authors | Material | Age group | Study subjects ( | Positive subjects ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Controls | Patients | Controls | |||
| Buslau et al. (1990) | Stool | Unspecified | 343 | 50 | 233 (68%) | 27 (54%) |
| Waldman et al. (2001a) | Saliva | Children and adults | 50 | 50 | 39 (78%) | 25 (50%) |
| Waldman et al. (2001b) | Stool | Children and adults | 50 | 50 | 36 (72%) | 23 (46%) |
| Flytström et al. (2003) | Axilla and groin | Adults | 45 | 19 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Leibovici et al. (2008a) | Axilla and groin | Adults | 100 | 100 | 5 (5%) | 3 (3%) |
| Leibovici et al. (2008b) | Tongue | Adults | 100 | 100 | 32 (32%) | 21 (21%) |
| Bedair et al. (2012) | Normal oral mucosa | Adults | 100 | 100 | 69 (69%) | 44 (44%) |
| Darwazeh et al. (2012) | Oral mucosal lesions | Adults | 100 | 100 | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) |
| Picciani et al. (2013) | Normal oral mucosa | Adults | 140 | 140 | 37 (26%) | 0 (0%) |
| Taheri Sarvtin et al. (2014a) | Normal skin | Children and adults | 100 | 50 | 15 (15%) | 2 (4%) |
| Taheri Sarvtin et al. (2014b) | Normal oral mucosa | Children and adults | 100 | 50 | 60 (60%) | 10 (20%) |
| Chularojanamontri et al. (2016) | Normal oral mucosa | Adults | 60 | 60 | 18 (30%) | 8 (13.3%) |
Figure 2(a) Meta-analysis of eight studies (among them, one contained two different types of examined material) comparing odds ratios (ORs) for the detection of Candida spp. from mucosal membranes of psoriasis patients and healthy controls of any age. (b) Meta-analysis of five studies comparing odds ratios (ORs) for the detection of Candida spp. from mucosal membranes of adult psoriasis patients and healthy controls.
Figure 3(a) Meta-analysis of three studies comparing odds ratios (ORs) for the detection of Candida spp. from the skin of psoriasis patients and healthy controls of any age. (b) Meta-analysis of two studies comparing odds ratios (ORs) for the detection of Candida spp. from the skin of adult psoriasis patients and healthy controls.
Post hoc sensitivity analysis for studies included in the meta-analysis (each study excluded).
| Excluded study | OR | SE | 95% CI |
| Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedair et al. (2012) | 2.94 | 0.61 | 1.96–4.43 | <0.001 | 84.01% |
| Buslau et al. (1990) | 3.14 | 0.59 | 2.17–4.53 | <0.001 | 84.54% |
| Chularojanamontri et al. (2016) | 2.93 | 0.57 | 2.00–4.29 | <0.001 | 90.67% |
| Darwazeh et al. (2012) | 2.86 | 0.52 | 2.01–4.07 | <0.001 | 98.73% |
| Flytström et al. (2003) | 2.93 | 0.52 | 2.07–4.14 | <0.001 | 99.27% |
| Leibovici et al. (2008a) | 2.98 | 0.55 | 2.07–4.28 | <0.001 | 95.36% |
| Leibovici et al. (2008b) | 3.13 | 0.59 | 2.17–4.51 | <0.001 | 85.45% |
| Picciani et al. (2013) | 2.66 | 0.35 | 2.05–3.45 | <0.001 | 98.58% |
| Taheri Sarvtin et al. (2014a) | 2.85 | 0.53 | 1.98–4.09 | <0.001 | 95.65% |
| Taheri Sarvtin et al. (2014b) | 2.57 | 0.42 | 1.87–3.53 | <0.001 | 88.70% |
| Waldman et al. (2001a) | 2.84 | 0.55 | 1.94–4.15 | <0.001 | 89.83% |
| Waldman et al. (2001b) | 2.90 | 0.57 | 1.97–4.27 | <0.001 | 89.22% |
| Overall effect | 2.88 | 0.50 | 2.05–4.06 | <0.001 | 100.00% |